Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

New Mexico · Nonprofit

RAILYARD PARK CONSERVANCY

RAILYARD PARK CONSERVANCY (New Mexico) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $187,250 to it, the largest being BRINDLE FOUNDATION ($128,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$266k
Revenue FY2025
8
Funders on record
$187k
Grants received
$144k
Net assets
3/8 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 24%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($96k) Expenses 100 ($127k) Net assets 100 ($54k)2018 Revenue 231 ($221k) Expenses 146 ($185k) Net assets 167 ($90k)2019 Revenue 228 ($219k) Expenses 168 ($213k) Net assets 178 ($96k)2020 Revenue 116 ($111k) Expenses 102 ($130k) Net assets 144 ($77k)2021 Revenue 150 ($144k) Expenses 132 ($168k) Net assets 100 ($54k)2022 Revenue 330 ($316k) Expenses 193 ($245k) Net assets 233 ($125k)2023 Revenue 220 ($211k) Expenses 189 ($239k) Net assets 181 ($97k)2024 Revenue 278 ($267k) Expenses 194 ($246k) Net assets 219 ($118k)2025 Revenue 277 ($266k) Expenses 189 ($240k) Net assets 268 ($144k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (277)Expenses (189)Net assets (268)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$31k
17
$36k
18
$6k
19
$18k
20
$24k
21
$71k
22
$28k
23
$21k
24
$26k
25
7.3
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 4 funders, grant income rose $8k → $36k.

2 of 8 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)19% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of RAILYARD PARK CONSERVANCY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

RAILYARD PARK CONSERVANCY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 68% of grant income and the top three 94%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

28% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund RAILYARD PARK CONSERVANCY.

68%
largest funder
94%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 82% · 2019 66% · 2020 100% · 2021 64% · 2022 100% · 2023 86%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

75% of RAILYARD PARK CONSERVANCY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 38% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

91% of RAILYARD PARK CONSERVANCY's grant income comes from New Mexico funders.

WI
VA
NM

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

18
19
21
22
23
New Mexico out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $35k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 8 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like RAILYARD PARK CONSERVANCY

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In New Mexico

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

74% of spending goes to programs.

Program 74%Management 22%Fundraising 4%

Governance

6
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

NM

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for RAILYARD PARK CONSERVANCY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds RAILYARD PARK CONSERVANCY?
RAILYARD PARK CONSERVANCY (New Mexico) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $187,250 to it, the largest being BRINDLE FOUNDATION ($128,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does RAILYARD PARK CONSERVANCY have?
IRS filings report 8 organizations giving $187,250 in grants to RAILYARD PARK CONSERVANCY, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of RAILYARD PARK CONSERVANCY?
BRINDLE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $128,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like RAILYARD PARK CONSERVANCY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New Mexico. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 8funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing