· Private foundation
Bonfils-Stanton Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 170 grants below total $2,834,852 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,725,212 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,890,360 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k57 grants · $131k
- $10k–50k101 grants · $1.9M
- $50k–250k12 grants · $792k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RedLine Contemporary Art Center | $200,000 |
| Colorado Symphony Association | $60,000 |
| Rooted | $60,000 |
| Cleo Parker Robinson Dance | $60,000 |
| Museum of Contemporary Art Denver | $60,000 |
| West Colfax Community Development Corp | $52,000 |
| Boulder Chamber Orchestra of Colorado | $50,000 |
| The Word, A Storytelling Sanctuary | $50,000 |
| Latino Cultural Arts Center | $50,000 |
| Opera Colorado | $50,000 |
| Denver Film Society | $50,000 |
| ArtistiCO Inc | $50,000 |
| RedLine Contemporary Art Center | $45,000 |
| RedLine Contemporary Art Center | $40,000 |
| Youth on Record | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 48% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
91 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2025, 47 since wound down; 63 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DADENVER ART MUSEUM3× · 2020–2022 · $1.1M · revenue +72%
- WWONDERBOUND4× · 2020–2025 · $748k · revenue +38%
- RMROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC4× · 2020–2025 · $610k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- NDNEW DANCE THEATRE INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $337k · revenue +55%
- CPCleo Parker Robinson Dance Theatreone grant, 2020 · $215k
- DCDENVER CIVIC ARTS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of Flamenco Denver is to train, educate and share with the broad community the discipline, power and joy of flamenco as a living art form. Through ongoing classes, interactive outreach to schools and high quality performances,…
Providing entertainment and education through the production of high-quality orchestral music.
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
To inspire and connect community members of all ages by providing access to the best of the world's music through education and performance.
Colorado Artists in Recovery utilizes recovery-oriented principles to provide a safe, encouraging, and inclusive environment for people affected by substance use and mental health. Through our workshops and events we nurture their creative…
The Cultural Caravan brings together locally-owned businesses, social-serviced nonprofits, municipal organizations, and local artists to make Boulder more vibrant, inclusive, culturally active, and economically vital by presenting…
The Durango Arts Center ("DAC") enriches the community through innovative visual and performing art, and arts education. DAC advances appreciation and participation in the arts as a cultural leader in the region.
Since 1966, BCAA acts as a catalyst to incubate, stimulate and sustain a thriving arts community in Boulder County. BCAA commits to championing policies and practices of cultural equity that empower a just, inclusive and equitable Boulder…
Colorado nbsp;music nbsp;bridge nbsp;provides nbsp;access nbsp;to nbsp;inclusive nbsp;modern nbsp;music nbsp;education nbsp;programs nbsp;curricular nbsp;resources nbsp;and nbsp;professional nbsp;development
The center for arts, a home for arts and culture, offers engaging opportunities and educational experiences to enrich and expand the life of our community.
Our mission is to collaborate with local artists and businesses to promote contemporary art in public spaces in Fort Collins, Colorado. FCMP is focused on providing opportunities for underrepresented and emerging artists in Colorado.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Childrens Museum of Denver Inc and the most unlike its peers is Skinner Middle School Pto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
160 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 160 of the 239 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds THE DENVER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WONDERBOUND ↗
- Who funds Redline ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE WRITERS WORKSHOP INC ↗
- Who funds NEW DANCE THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DENVER ↗
- Who funds COLORADO BALLET ↗
- Who funds OPERA COLORADO ↗
- Who funds ART STUDENTS LEAGUE OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds CURIOUS THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL CITY OPERA HOUSE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MUSEO DE LAS AMERICAS ↗
- Who funds DENVER FILM SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds SU TEATRO INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO CHILDREN'S CHORALE ↗
- Who funds PHAMALY THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds COLORADO PHOTOGRAPHIC ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds DENVER YOUNG ARTISTS ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Denver Architecture Foundation ↗
- Who funds DENVER BIENNIAL OF THE AMERICAS CORP ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF DENVER INC ↗
- Who funds SWALLOW HILL MUSIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds The Word A Storytelling Sanctuary Inc ↗
- Who funds DENVER CIVIC ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Rose Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds PLATTEFORUM ↗
- Who funds CENTRO CULTURAL MEXICANO CORP ↗
- Who funds LATINO CULTURAL ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF LEVITT PAVILION DENVER ↗
- Who funds DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC ↗
- Who funds Colorado Museum of Natural History ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ON RECORD ↗
- Who funds MIZEL CENTER FOR ARTS AND CULTURE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Latino Community Foundation of Colorado Inc · Gates Family Foundation · Redline · Boettcher Foundation · Caring for Denver Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · The Women's Foundation of Colorado Inc · The Colorado Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bonfils-Stanton Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Bonfils-Stanton Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Bonfils-Stanton Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.