· Public charity
Redline
Redline fosters education and engagement between artists and communities to create positive social change.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 39 grants below total $582,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $661,040 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $79,040 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k15 grants · $84k
- $10k–50k24 grants · $499k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Warm Cookies of the Revolution | $40,000 |
| Colorado State University | $35,000 |
| Mt Carmel Veterans Services Center | $35,000 |
| Musical Mentors Collaborative | $35,000 |
| 2MX2 LLC | $32,000 |
| Voices | $30,000 |
| Sound Affects Music | $26,000 |
| Friends of the Genoa Tower | $25,000 |
| Presenting Denver | $25,000 |
| Fiestas Patrias LLC | $20,000 |
| The Word A Storytelling Sanctuary Inc | $20,000 |
| Colorado Dragon Boat Festival | $20,000 |
| Aurora Economic Opportunity Coalition | $20,000 |
| Art Students League of Denver | $17,500 |
| Rural Journalism Institute of SLV | $16,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $271k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
41 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $396k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WCWARM COOKIES OF THE REVOLUTION4× · 2017–2024 · $135k · revenue +224%
- MTMOTUS THEATER3× · 2018–2020 · $93k · revenue +266%
THE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER5× · 2017–2024 · $85k · revenue +29%
Funded once
- CECOLORADO ENERGY OFFICEone grant, 2019 · $50k
- CCCORTEZ CENTER INC DBA CORTEZ CULTURAL CENTERone grant, 2020 · $35k · revenue -10%
- COCOLORADO ORGANIZATION FOR LATINA OPPORTUNITY AND REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTSgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +72%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Colorado Artists in Recovery utilizes recovery-oriented principles to provide a safe, encouraging, and inclusive environment for people affected by substance use and mental health. Through our workshops and events we nurture their creative…
The Cultural Caravan brings together locally-owned businesses, social-serviced nonprofits, municipal organizations, and local artists to make Boulder more vibrant, inclusive, culturally active, and economically vital by presenting…
The center for arts, a home for arts and culture, offers engaging opportunities and educational experiences to enrich and expand the life of our community.
Since 1966, BCAA acts as a catalyst to incubate, stimulate and sustain a thriving arts community in Boulder County. BCAA commits to championing policies and practices of cultural equity that empower a just, inclusive and equitable Boulder…
Our mission is to collaborate with local artists and businesses to promote contemporary art in public spaces in Fort Collins, Colorado. FCMP is focused on providing opportunities for underrepresented and emerging artists in Colorado.
Colorado events mission is to organize community events that increase public knowledge and appreciation for visual arts, fine crafts, and supporting local merchants, by creating opportunities that connect artists and local businesses, with…
The Gunnison Arts Center creates community through the arts by providing accessible and inclusive programs, events, and educational experiences that foster creativity, support local artists, and enrich lives.
The Denver Fringe Festival is an annual, open-access festival that supports bold, progressive arts and diverse voices in all genres of performance arts. Our primary purpose is to support independent artists and promote access to original…
The Durango Arts Center ("DAC") enriches the community through innovative visual and performing art, and arts education. DAC advances appreciation and participation in the arts as a cultural leader in the region.
Open Studios is an organization operating in Boulder County, Colorado that serves artists and the broader community by advancing the visual arts through education and events.
The Art District on Santa Fe serves as a vital organization in uniting artists, providing educational and technical resources to businesses, driving economic development through events and programming, advocating for members and the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth On Record and the most unlike its peers is Mt Rose Health Center Palliative Care and Hospice Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
98 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 98 of the 134 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WARM COOKIES OF THE REVOLUTION ↗
- Who funds MOTUS THEATER ↗
- Who funds THE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ON RECORD ↗
- Who funds COLORADO PHOTOGRAPHIC ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ART STUDENTS LEAGUE OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds THE HADANOU COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds SOUND AFFECTS MUSIC ↗
- Who funds SU TEATRO INC ↗
- Who funds Mancos Creative District Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUTH EMPLOYMENT ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds PHAMALY THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds POP CULTURE CLASSROOM ↗
- Who funds BLUE SAGE CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds LOCAL THEATER COMPANY ↗
- Who funds ACCESS GALLERY ↗
- Who funds MT CARMEL VETERANS SERVICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR INDIGENOUS RESOURCE MANAGEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds THE COYOTE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds COLORADO BLACK ARTS MOVEMENT ↗
- Who funds EcoArts Connections ↗
- Who funds BOULDER COMMUNITY BROADCAST ASSOC INC ↗
- Who funds PLATTEFORUM ↗
- Who funds WORDS TO POWER ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE GENOA TOWER ↗
- Who funds THINK 360 ARTS FOR LEARNING ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN AURORA VISUAL ARTS ↗
- Who funds MIRROR IMAGE ↗
- Who funds EMANUEL PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Musical Mentors Collaborative Inc ↗
- Who funds COLORADO HUMANITIES ↗
- Who funds CORTEZ CENTER INC DBA CORTEZ CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WRIGHT OPERA HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO ORGANIZATION FOR LATINA OPPORTUNITY AND REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rose Community Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Bonfils-Stanton Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Caring for Denver Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · Latino Community Foundation of Colorado Inc · Mile High United Way Inc · El Pomar Foundation · Caring for Colorado Foundation · Sheila Fortune Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Redline funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.