· Public charity
Mile High United Way Inc
Mile high united way's mission is to unite people, ideas, and resources to advance the common good.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 314 grants below total $24,258,122 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $26,590,037 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,331,915 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k68 grants · $490k
- $10k–50k178 grants · $3.7M
- $50k–250k37 grants · $3.2M
- $250k+31 grants · $17M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST VRAIN VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT | $2,001,772 |
| WESTERN STATES COLLEGE OF CONSTRUCT | $1,012,024 |
| ASSOC GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF CO | $860,297 |
| COLORADO RIVER BOCES | $793,218 |
| AFRICAN AMERICAN TRADE ASSOCIATION | $726,590 |
| ACTIVATE WORK INC | $669,615 |
| TRINIDAD STATE COLLEGE | $651,656 |
| COLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $641,400 |
| DENVER HYBRID COLLEGE DBA ADVANCEED | $599,113 |
| COLORADO EDUCATION INITIATIVE | $584,254 |
| CROSSPURPOSE | $580,028 |
| COLORADO LEAGUE OF CHARTER SCHOOLS | $528,974 |
| THE ATTAINMENT NETWORK | $517,396 |
| LA CLINICA TEPEYAC | $470,570 |
| CAREERWISE COLORADO | $468,886 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $23.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
970 repeat relationships — 293 still active in FY2025, 677 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC9× · 2017–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +47%- WVWARREN VILLAGE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $2.4M · revenue +226%
- MHMILE HIGH MONTESSORI EARLY LEARNING CENT7× · 2019–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +14%
Funded once
- TCTHE COLORADO HEALTH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $1.9M · revenue -50%
RELAY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATIONone grant, 2024 · $562k · revenue -18%- TNTAKE NOTE COLORADOone grant, 2018 · $405k · revenue -96% · 64% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
Colorado Thrives exists to support Coloradans to achieve economic mobility through access to good jobs.
Provide opportunities for all to thrive by offering free food resources to communities.
Colorado organization for latina opportunity and reproductive rights (color) is a community-rooted nonprofit organization that works to enable latinx individuals and their families lead safe, healthy, self-determined lives.
Advance workers rights & social justice through building sustained relationships and taking direct action to create concrete change in the lives of working families
The foundation is a state-based philanthropic foundation - led by latinos and for latinos. the foundation pursues civic, economic, and cultural opportunities that drive a more authentic narrative about latinos in the state and cement a…
Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.
The Center for Nonprofit Excellence strengthens Southern Colorado's nonprofit sector through leadership and resource development, advocacy and collaboration. Together, with our partners, we are co-creating a vibrant community in the Pikes…
To empower low-income families and individuals towards self-sufficiency and independent living.
Healthier colorado is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to raising the voices of coloradans in the public policy process to improve the health of our state's residents. we believe that every coloradan should have a fair…
Together we create solutions for a better life.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mile High United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is Moloian Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
978 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 978 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC ↗
- Who funds WARREN VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds MILE HIGH MONTESSORI EARLY LEARNING CENT ↗
- Who funds THE COLORADO HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds GEORGE W CLAYTON TRUST ↗
- Who funds DENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Colorado Coalition for the Homeless ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds COLORADO STATEWIDE PARENT COALITION ↗
- Who funds FAMILY TREE INC ↗
- Who funds TENNYSON CENTER FOR CHILDREN AT COLORADO CHRISTIAN HOME ↗
- Who funds PIKES PEAK UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds GREATER COLORADO COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds URBAN PEAK DENVER ↗
- Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER ↗
- Who funds GROWING HOME INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN DENVER ↗
- Who funds COLORADO YOUTH FOR A CHANGE ↗
- Who funds Clear Creek County Advocates ↗
- Who funds Craig Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds LA CLINICA TEPEYAC ↗
- Who funds KPMG US FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY STAR INC ↗
- Who funds CHICANO HUMANITIES AND ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds ABILITY CONNECTION COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds MILE HIGH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Caring for Colorado Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Trailhead Institute · Delta Dental Plan of Colorado Foundation Inc · The Colorado Trust · Hill Foundation Wells Fargo Bank Na · The Colorado Health Foundation · Caring for Colorado Centennial Fund · Schlessman Foundation Inc · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Rose Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mile High United Way Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- United Way of Brevard County Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.