· Community foundation
Adirondack Foundation
ADIRONDACK FOUNDATION (the "foundation") is a community foundation and a tax-exempt, not-for-profit, autonomous, publicly supported, philanthropic institution formed for the following purposes:1.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 313 grants below total $8,228,115 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $9,167,394 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $939,279 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k53 grants · $384k
- $10k–50k213 grants · $3.6M
- $50k–250k45 grants · $3.6M
- $250k+2 grants · $675k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ADIRONDACK LAKES CENTER FOR THE ARTS (ALCA) | $425,000 |
| ADIRONDACK EXPERIENCE | $250,000 |
| PENDRAGON THEATRE | $225,000 |
| CLOUDSPLITTER FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| BRUCE L CRARY FOUNDATION INC | $150,000 |
| BRUCE L CRARY FOUNDATION INC | $150,000 |
| TICONDEROGA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION | $144,945 |
| LPHSA INC | $125,000 |
| HOMESTEAD DEVELOPMENT CORP | $120,000 |
| TUPPER LAKE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT | $100,000 |
| LAKE GEORGE LAND CONSERVANCY | $100,000 |
| LAKE PLACID CENTER FOR THE ARTS (LPCA) | $100,000 |
| HOMESTEAD DEVELOPMENT CORP | $100,000 |
| LAWYERS DEFENDING AMERICAN DEMOCRACY INC | $100,000 |
| ADIRONDACK LAKES CENTER FOR THE ARTS (ALCA) | $98,172 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 6% of Adirondack Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 89% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 80% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
232 repeat relationships — 118 still active in FY2025, 114 since wound down; 43 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +4%- LPLITTLE PEAKS INC6× · 2020–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +213% · 45% of their budget
- TLTHE LAKE PLACID ASSOCIATION FOR MUSIC DRAMA AND ART INC9× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +823%
Funded once
- TOTOWN OF KEENEone grant, 2023 · $126k
- FCFLYING CHANGE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2024 · $97k
- ATADIRONDACK TRI-COUNTY NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER INCone grant, 2017 · $81k · revenue -100%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The central new york land trust seeks to preserve and protect natural areas in order to provide our communities clean water, clean air, wildlife habitat, and a chance to connect with the land.
To enhance business in the community and to provide a networking environment for area businesses, promote tourism in the community and develop new business.
To provide historical education and information of the town of ticonderoga and the lower adirondack region of new york state.
See schedule onylcvef's mission is to educate, engage and empower new yorkers to be effective advocates on behalf of the environment from clean energy and funding for parks, to solid waste and green buildings. first, we educate new yorkers…
Dutchess land conservancy (dlc) is dedicated to preserving the scenic, agricultural and environmental resources of dutchess county, new york, and the surrounding area. dlc, as a private non-profit land conservation organization, carries…
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
To manage the preservation and conservation of an approximate 50,000 acre preserve.
A public library with locations in catskill and palenville, new york providing reference materials and various on-line services.
Woodland pond, inc. dba woodland pond at new paltz, was created to construct and operate a continuing care retirement community (the "ccrc") named woodland pond at new paltz, under article 46 of new york state public health law.the ccrc…
The mission of the lake champlain land trust is to save the scenic beauty, natural communities, and recreational amenities of lake champlain by permanently preserving significant islands, shoreline areas, and natural communities in the…
To hold and manage open space property for the public's benefit and assist in the preservation and stewardship of the scenic beauty, natural communities and recreational amenities in greene county, ny and surrounding areas.
To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Adirondack Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Cloudsplitter Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
341 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 341 of the 458 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BRUCE L CRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLE PEAKS INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds THE LAKE PLACID ASSOCIATION FOR MUSIC DRAMA AND ART INC ↗
- Who funds ADIRONDACK LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds ADIRONDACK HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ADIRONDACK LAKES CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds Northern Forest Center Inc ↗
- Who funds PAUL SMITHS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Homestead Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ADKACTIONORG INC ↗
- Who funds PENDRAGON INC ↗
- Who funds THE ADIRONDACK COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY AND RESTORATIVE JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds INFANT JESUS OF PRAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds ADIRONDACK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TRUDEAU INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds ADIRONDACK EXPLORER INC ↗
- Who funds CLOUDSPLITTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Friends of Christ Church Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN FOREST ATLAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SHORE OWNERS' ASSOCIATION OF LAKE PLACID ↗
- Who funds ADIRONDACK NORTH COUNTRY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF PLATTSBURGH INC ↗
- Who funds MERCY CARE FOR THE ADIRONDACKS INC ↗
- Who funds THE FORT TICONDEROGA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SARANAC LAKE ROTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAGAMORE INSTITUTE OF THE ADIRONDACKS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK SKI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH COUNTRY SPCA INC ↗
- Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds MALONE RECREATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD CARE COORDINATING COUNCIL OF THE NORTH COUNTRY INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH COUNTRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PLAY ADK INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Cloudsplitter Foundation · Glenn and Carol Pearsall Adirondack Foun · Charles R Wood Foundation · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Henry Uihlein II and Mildred a Uihlein Foundation · United Way of the Adirondack Region Inc · Staritch Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · Lake Placid Education Foundation · Boquet Foundation Inc · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Adirondack Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Vermont Law School — 14% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
- Shelburne Farms — 3% of income from government
- Northeast Wilderness Trust Corporation — 2% of income from government
- Berkshire Choral International Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.