· Private foundation
Boquet Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k38 grants · $86k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $225k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| St JOHN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $45,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CHRIST CHURCH INC | $25,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CHRIST CHURCH INC | $25,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CHRIST CHURCH INC | $25,000 |
| NATURE CONSERVANCY - ADIRONDACK CHAPTER | $20,000 |
| NATURE CONSERVANCY - ADIRONDACK CHAPTER | $20,000 |
| PAINE MEMORIAL FREE LIBRARY | $19,000 |
| ADIRONDACK LAND TRUST INC | $15,500 |
| CHURCH OF THE HEAVENLY REST | $10,000 |
| NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC | $10,000 |
| OPEN SPACE INSTITUTE INC | $10,000 |
| CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD | $7,000 |
| CENTER FOR COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH PRACTICE INC | $5,000 |
| ADIRONDACK EXPLORER INC | $5,000 |
| CVPH FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
54 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFAmerican Friends of Christ Church Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $202k · revenue +68%
- ALADIRONDACK LAND TRUST INC9× · 2017–2025 · $144k · revenue +294%
- TFTHE FORT TICONDEROGA ASSOCIATION4× · 2017–2020 · $90k · revenue +58%
Funded once
- HSHISPANIC SOCIETY OF AMERICAone grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
- SFSAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONYone grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
- TBTHE BERKSHIRE SCHOOL INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Adk is the only non-profit organization in new york state dedicated to the conservation, preservation, and responsible recreational use of the new york state forest preserve and other parks, wild lands, and waters vital to our members and…
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
Protect is a grassroots, membership organization dedicated to the protection, stewardship and sustainability of the natural environment and human communities of the adirondack park and the new york state forest preserve for current and…
The central new york land trust seeks to preserve and protect natural areas in order to provide our communities clean water, clean air, wildlife habitat, and a chance to connect with the land.
Northeast wilderness trust is a regional land trust working to preserve and restore forever-wild landscapes for nature and people in new york, vermont, new hampshire, maine, massachusetts and connecticut.
Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.
To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.
Dutchess land conservancy (dlc) is dedicated to preserving the scenic, agricultural and environmental resources of dutchess county, new york, and the surrounding area. dlc, as a private non-profit land conservation organization, carries…
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Support regional economic development in new york's 14 northernmost counties
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Adirondack Council Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds American Friends of Christ Church Inc ↗
- Who funds PAINE MEMORIAL FREE LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds ADIRONDACK LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds THE FORT TICONDEROGA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds OPEN SPACE INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds ST PAUL'S SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ADIRONDACK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Northern Forest Center Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ADIRONDACK COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC SOCIETY OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY ↗
- Who funds ST BERNARD'S SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH PRACTICE INC ↗
- Who funds CVPH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ADIRONDACK EXPLORER INC ↗
- Who funds PRINCETON UNIVERSITY ROWING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE FOR EVERY STUDENT INC ↗
- Who funds JUILLIARD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE BERKSHIRE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds ADIRONDACK HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF THE ADIRONDACKS ↗
- Who funds CHAMPLAIN AREA TRAILS INC ↗
- Who funds EMPIRE STATE FORESTRY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ELIZABETHTOWN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds SHELBURNE MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOR DEPRESSION RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DOWNEAST LAKES LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Adirondack Foundation · Cloudsplitter Foundation · Glenn and Carol Pearsall Adirondack Foun · David & Candace Weir Foundation · Evergreen Foundation Inc · The Walbridge Fund · Charles R Wood Foundation · The Vermont Community Foundation · Meadowhill Fund Inc · Overhills Foundation · Open Space Institute Land Trust Inc · The New York Community Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Boquet Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Vermont Land Trust Inc — 42% of income from government
- Homefront Inc — 9% of income from government
- Shelburne Museum Inc — 9% of income from government
- Lake Champlain Land Trust Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Boquet Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Boquet Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.