Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Staritch Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$413k
Granted FY2024still arriving
88
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$84k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$1.3MArts & Culture$268kRecreation & Sports$234kHealth$225kReligion$193kEnvironment$180kFood & Nutrition$141kHuman Services$72kOther$0
02FY2024 · 88 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k82 grants · $174k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $33k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $207k
$1,500
Median grant
14
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCH OF THE ASCENSION$84,300
NORTHWOOD SCHOOL$72,125
ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER$50,200
UPPER SARANAC LAKE FOUNDATION INC$13,000
FGCU - FDN OF COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$10,000
HISTORIC SARANAC LAKE$10,000
NICOLE CANUSO DANCE COMPANY$9,000
BARKEATER TRAILS ALLIANCE$7,500
AMERICAN RED CROSS$7,000
ASHOKAN FOUNDATION$7,000
WILMA THEATER$6,000
BURKE MOUNTAIN ACADEMY$5,500
ST MICHAEL AND ALL ANGELS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$5,000
GATHER NH$5,000
SEACOAST SCIENCE CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $104k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER: $500 → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER: $500 → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER: $500 → 10%LUTHERAN VOLUNTEER CORPS: $5k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER: $500 → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER: $500 → 10%LUTHERAN VOLUNTEER CORPS: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%LUTHERAN VOLUNTEER CORPS: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER: $500 → 10%LUTHERAN VOLUNTEER CORPS: $2k → 14%LUTHERAN VOLUNTEER CORPS: $2k → 14%LUTHERAN VOLUNTEER CORPS: $2k → 14%LUTHERAN VOLUNTEER CORPS: $2k → 14%LUTHERAN VOLUNTEER CORPS: $1k → 14%FISH OF SANCAP: $2k → 11%FISH OF SANCAP: $2k → 11%FISH OF SANCAP: $2k → 11%FISH OF SANCAP: $1k → 11%FISH OF SANCAP: $1k → 11%GATHER: $19k → 5%ECUMENICAL COUNCIL OF SARANAC LAKE: $5k → 16%FISH OF SANCAP: $500 → 11%GATHER: $5k → 5%GATHER NH: $5k → 5%ECUMENICAL COUNCIL OF SARANAC LAKE: $5k → 16%GATHER: $5k → 5%GATHER: $5k → 5%ECUMENICAL COUNCIL OF SARANAC LAKE: $5k → 16%GATHER: $2k → 5%ECUMENICAL COUNCIL OF SARANAC LAKE: $5k → 16%GATHER: $1k → 5%ECUMENICAL COUNCIL OF SARANAC LAKE: $2k → 16%HIGH PEAKS HOSPICE: $1k → 16%HIGH PEAKS HOSPICE: $600 → 16%HIGH PEAKS HOSPICE: $600 → 16%HIGH PEAKS HOSPICE: $600 → 16%HIGH PEAKS HOSPICE: $600 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
ND
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
CT
RI
CA
VA
MD
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.7M · 110 repeat orgs$141k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +50% for the ones you funded once.

110 repeat relationships — 84 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

110
28

Total granted

$2.7M
$134k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+50%

Still filing today

73%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NORTHWOOD SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $762k · revenue +9%
  • SL
    SARANAC LAKE CIVIC CENTER INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $197k · revenue +191%
  • AM
    ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER
    4× · 2017–2024 · $146k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • CO
    CORPORATION OF ST TIMOTHY'S SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue -11%
  • UI
    UNH INSTITUTE ON DISABILITY
    one grant, 2018 · $9k
  • SF
    SOCIETY FOR PROMOTION OF WINTER CARNIVAL SARANAC LAKE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -102%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
3
The Adirondack Council Inc

The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…

Environment
4
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
5
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
7
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
8
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
9
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
10
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Adirondack Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Footprints Inc Footprints Food Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Community Arts CentersCommunity Food PantriesCommunity FoundationsDomestic Violence ServicesAnimal Rescue and ShelterEnvironmental Conservation …Local Food System Organizat…Senior Support ServicesPublic Library OperationsFood Banks and PantriesIndependent K-12 SchoolsSchool District Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr19%25%20–35yr13%36%35–55yr16%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr19%18%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%49%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/108
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,652

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

100 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 100 of the 143 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
30
Early backer (in before they grew)
99/100
Grantees still filing
80/100
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NORTHWOOD SCHOOL — $761,800 · OtherNORTHWOOD SCHOOLFGCU - FDN OF COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $150,000 · OtherFGCU - FDN OF COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGECHURCH OF THE ASCENSION — $109,200 · OtherCHURCH OF THE ASCENSIONINLAND LAKES EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $93,900 · Other+87 more — $672,652 · Other+87 moreCORPORATION OF ST TIMOTHY'S SCHOOL — $100,000 · EducationCORPORATION …UPPER SARANAC LAKE FOUNDATION INC — $95,500 · EducationUPPER SARANA…BURKE MOUNTAIN ACADEMY INC — $59,000 · EducationBURKE MOUNTA…HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES — $18,500 · EducationHAMPSHIRE CO…SWARTHMORE COLLEGE — $17,200 · EducationPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY — $11,150 · Education+11 more — $21,215 · Education+11 moreSARANAC LAKE CIVIC CENTER INC — $196,500 · Community ImprovementADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER — $145,600 · HealthTRUDEAU INSTITUTE INC — $22,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $7,500 · Health+3 more — $5,100 · HealthPORTSMOUTH MUSIC & ARTS CENTER INC — $41,500 · Arts & CulturePIG IRON THEATRE COMPANY INC — $22,000 · Arts & CultureSEACOAST SCIENCE CENTER INC — $18,700 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC SARANAC LAKE — $16,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WILMA THEATER — $16,000 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED ATLAS INC — $15,500 · Arts & CultureADIRONDACK EXPLORER INC — $11,000 · Arts & CultureBALLETX — $9,000 · Arts & CulturePAINTED BRIDE ART CENTER INC — $6,000 · Arts & Culture+6 more — $17,500 · Arts & CultureGather — $42,200 · Human ServicesECUMENICAL COUNCIL OF SARANAC LAKE INC — $22,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN VOLUNTEER CORPS — $17,500 · Human ServicesFISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC — $8,500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $7,500 · Human Services+2 more — $6,400 · Human ServicesLIFE AND HOPE INC — $23,700 · Food & NutritionSARANAC LAKE INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY — $22,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC — $13,250 · Food & NutritionREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC — $8,500 · Food & Nutrition+2 more — $3,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,787,552Education$322,565Community Improvement$196,500Health$180,200Arts & Culture$173,200Human Services$104,100Food & Nutrition$70,450

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTHWOOD SCHOOL — $761,800 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetSARANAC LAKE CIVIC CENTER INC — $196,500 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER — $145,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCORPORATION OF ST TIMOTHY'S SCHOOL — $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUPPER SARANAC LAKE FOUNDATION INC — $95,500 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetINLAND LAKES EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $93,900 over 8y, 8.7% of budgetBURKE MOUNTAIN ACADEMY INC — $59,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetGather — $42,200 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetPORTSMOUTH MUSIC & ARTS CENTER INC — $41,500 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetGreater Philadelphia Film Office — $24,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetN STREET VILLAGE INC — $24,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLIFE AND HOPE INC — $23,700 over 2y, 23% of budgetWEST MT AIRY NEIGHBORS INC — $23,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetSARANAC LAKE INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY — $22,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetTRUDEAU INSTITUTE INC — $22,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetECUMENICAL COUNCIL OF SARANAC LAKE INC — $22,000 over 5y, 6.2% of budgetPIG IRON THEATRE COMPANY INC — $22,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC — $20,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSEACOAST SCIENCE CENTER INC — $18,700 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES — $18,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS FOUNDATION INC — $18,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN VOLUNTEER CORPS — $17,500 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetSWARTHMORE COLLEGE — $17,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTRI LAKES HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $16,750 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetADIRONDACK FOUNDATION — $16,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHISTORIC SARANAC LAKE — $16,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE WILMA THEATER — $16,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC — $15,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSARANAC LAKE VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD — $15,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC — $15,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetASHOKAN FOUNDATION INC — $14,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $13,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $12,300 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $12,300 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Country Life Flight Inc — $12,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $12,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY — $11,150 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER — $11,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetADIRONDACK EXPLORER INC — $11,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $9,700 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBALLETX — $9,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN IMMIGRATION & REFUGEE SERVICE INC DBA GLOBAL REFUGE — $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC — $8,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC — $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $7,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF THE WISSAHICKON INC — $7,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $7,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSoutheast Land Trust of New Hampshire — $7,400 over 8y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHWOOD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SARANAC LAKE CIVIC CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF ST TIMOTHY'S SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds UPPER SARANAC LAKE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INLAND LAKES EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BURKE MOUNTAIN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds Gather ↗
  • Who funds PORTSMOUTH MUSIC & ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Greater Philadelphia Film Office ↗
  • Who funds N STREET VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE AND HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST MT AIRY NEIGHBORS INC ↗
  • Who funds SARANAC LAKE INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds TRUDEAU INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds ECUMENICAL COUNCIL OF SARANAC LAKE INC ↗
  • Who funds PIG IRON THEATRE COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC ↗
  • Who funds SEACOAST SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds BALTIMORE SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN VOLUNTEER CORPS ↗
  • Who funds SWARTHMORE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds TRI LAKES HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ADIRONDACK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC SARANAC LAKE ↗
  • Who funds THE WILMA THEATER ↗
  • Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cloudsplitter Foundat…Adirondack FoundationNew Hampshire Charita…JM McDonald Foundatio…A Caring Community IncWyncote FoundationThe William Penn Foun…Barrie and Deedee Wig…The Philadelphia Cult…The Lida FoundationThe Philadelphia Foun…Independence Foundati…
Cloudsplitter FoundationNY39.9× affinity17 shared granteesties to 5 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cloudsplitter Foundation · Adirondack Foundation · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · A Caring Community Inc · Wyncote Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · Barrie and Deedee Wigmore Foundation · The Philadelphia Cultural Fund Inc · The Lida Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Independence Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Staritch Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Lutheran Immigration & Refugee Service Inc Dba Global Refuge — 100% of income from government
  • National Council for the Traditional Arts — 53% of income from government
  • Jeanne Geiger Crisis Center Inc — 40% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Maryland Ensemble Theatre Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
  • Anthropocene Alliance — 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 143 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines