Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Moore Impact Inc

To provide agile, thoughtful, and expansive support to inidviduals, families, and organizations in order to help changemakers solve some of the world's greatest challenges.

$13M
Granted FY2024still arriving
105
Grants FY2024still arriving
22
States reached
$958k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.

Arts & Culture$9.8MEducation$4.3MCivil Rights$4.2MPhilanthropy$3.7MYouth Development$3.5MCrime & Legal$2.7MCommunity Improvement$1.5MHealth$1.2MOther$0
02FY2024 · 105 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 105 grants below total $11,105,246 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $12,671,766 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,566,520 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $721k
  • $50k–250k49 grants · $6.1M
  • $250k+13 grants · $4.2M
$55,000
Median grant
22
States reached
$8.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOWARD UNIVERSITY$957,700
ASHE CULTURAL ARTS CENTER$500,000
MANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP FOR TOMORROW$250,000
OVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER$250,000
NATIONAL CARES$250,000
DANCE THEATER OF HARLEM$250,000
AFRICAN LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION$250,000
RTA$250,000
A NEW WAY OF LIFE$250,000
AID COALITION$250,000
ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC$250,000
BARD PRISON INITIATIVE$250,000
PREP FOR PREP$250,000
UNMANAGEABLE$200,000
THE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM$200,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JULIAN: $175k → 11%LAS VEGAS INDIAN CENTER: $80k → 13%THE YMCA OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC: $2k → 11%ZORA'S CRADLE: $70k → 15%JULIAN: $125k → 11%HERITAGE GIVING FUND: $500 → 14%MAKE THE ROAD NEVADA: $50k → 13%ZORA'S CRADLE: $25k → 15%JULIAN: $125k → 11%ZORA'S CRADLE: $25k → 15%SISTERSONG: $20k → 13%TRUE BEGINNINGS: $50k → 13%CHILDREN'S RIGHTS INNOVATION FUND: $150k → 10%TRUE BEGINNINGS: $41k → 13%NATIONAL CARES: $250k → 17%YOU GOTTA BE: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
NV
WY
SD
PA
NJ
CA
CO
KY
MD
DE
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $1.5M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

United Kingdom$705k · 46% · 8 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL OPERATING SUPPORT · PROGRAM SUPPORT/PROJECT SUPPORT · CAPACITY BUILDING

Colombia$330k · 21% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAM SUPPORT/PROJECT SUPPORT · CAPACITY BUILDING

Brazil$300k · 19% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAM SUPPORT/PROJECT SUPPORT · PROGRAM SUPPORT

Nigeria$132k · 9% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL OPERATING SUPPORT · PROGRAM SUPPORT/PROJECT SUPPORT

Liberia$65k · 4% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAM SUPPORT

Zambia$8k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PROGRAM SUPPORT/PROJECT SUPPORT

Sierra Leone$7k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PROGRAM SUPPORT/PROJECT SUPPORT

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Moore Impact Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Moore Impact Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$25M · 53 repeat orgs$7.7M to everyone else

53 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
67

Total granted

$25M
$4.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+2%

Still filing today

94%
96%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyCivil RightsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +2%
  • OY
    OVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +77%
  • BARD COLLEGE
    3× · 2021–2024 · $975k · revenue +118%

Funded once

  • TN
    THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSIC
    one grant, 2022 · $800k · revenue -29%
  • BEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue +182%
  • WA
    WEST AFRICA VOCATIONAL EDUCATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue +76%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorofchangeorg

Colorofchange.org works to strengthen the voice of black americans and increase the level of accountability and responsiveness of elected officials to underrepresented black constituencies using the internet as a lobbying and…

—
2
The International Institute On Race Equality and Human Rights

The international institute on race, equality and human rights contributes to the promotion and defense of human rights, through training, technical assistance, advocacy, and strategic litigation conducted at the regional and international…

International
3
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
4
Latin American and Caribbean Community Center

Please provide explanation of organizations mission.

—
5
Justice Funders

Serve as a partner, educator, and guide for philanthropy in reimagining practices that advance a thriving and just world.

—
6
Girls for Gender Equity Inc

Girls for gender equity (gge) works intergenerationally, through a black feminist lens, to achieve gender and racial justice by centering the leadership of black girls and gender-expansive young people of color to reshape culture and…

Crime & Legal
7
The Black Literacy and Arts Collaborative Project
—
8
Repower Fund

Re:power fund exists to build a critical mass of social justice movements and their leaders who embody the ideology and practice of liberatory organizing, an organizing practice that is pro-black and grounded in community, collective…

Human Services
9
Prism Reports Inc

Through in-depth and thought-provoking journalism, prism reflects the lived experiences of people most impacted by injustice. As an independent and nonprofit newsroom LED by journalists of color, we tell stories from the ground up: to…

Education
10
National Latina Institute for Reproductive Justice

We demand health, dignity, and justice for our communities. We center and amplify Latine voices as we work to transform oppressive systems and narratives and to reclaim control over our bodies and lives. We build power by organizing our…

Health
11
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
12
Institute for Americas Future Inc

Iaf's purpose is to conduct research and publicize findings concerning citizen's attitudes about economic options confronting america. iaf is devoted to fostering a robust and democratic debate about ideas that will shape our country's…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leadersup and the most unlike its peers is New Jersey Environmental Justice Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyDance Arts OrganizationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsEnvironmental Conservation …Women & Girls Leadership De…Health Access Advocacy and …Affordable Housing Developm…Faith-Based Social ServicesLgbtq+ Community SupportChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Christian Missionary Organi…Ymca Youth DevelopmentAnimal Rescue and ShelterPregnancy Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Youth Development ServicesLocal History MuseumsYouth Mentoring ProgramsJewish Community Organizati…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community FoundationsCommunity Arts CentersImmigrant Worker Support
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%25%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr16%11%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%16%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%18%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.6%1/164
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,401

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

159 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 159 of the 164 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

12
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
157/159
Grantees still filing
70/159
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EFFORTS OF GRACE INC — $3,505,000 · Arts & CultureEFFORTS OF GRACE INCBOREALIS PHILANTHROPY — $1,500,000 · Arts & CultureBOREALIS PHILANTHROPYARRAY ALLIANCE INC — $1,400,000 · Arts & CultureARRAY ALLIANCE INCTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSIC — $800,000 · Arts & CultureTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN …BLACK ALLIANCE FOR JUST IMMIGRATION — $750,000 · Arts & CultureBLACK ALLIANCE FOR JUST IMMIGRATIONTHE MUSEUM FOR AFRICAN ART D/B/A THE AFRICA CENTER — $500,000 · Arts & CultureGENDER AMPLIFIED — $500,000 · Arts & CultureGIRLS MAKE BEATS INC — $415,000 · Arts & Culture+26 more — $2,876,299 · Arts & Culture+26 moreTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $3,048,100 · EducationTHE HOWARD UNIVERSI…BARD COLLEGE — $975,000 · EducationBARD COLLEGEHIDDEN GENIUS PROJECT — $650,000 · EducationHIDDEN GENIUS PROJE…AFRICAN LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $400,000 · EducationAFRICAN LEADERSHIP …MANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP FOR TOMORROW — $250,000 · EducationPREP FOR PREP — $250,000 · EducationCHICAGO FREEDOM SCHOOL — $220,000 · Education+8 more — $95,000 · EducationROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $1,750,000 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER…BEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE — $500,000 · PhilanthropyBEND THE AR…FLAMBOYAN FOUNDATION INC — $300,000 · PhilanthropyFLAMBOYAN F…AMERICA ISRAEL DEMOCRACY COALITION — $250,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICA ISR…AAPI CIVIC ENGAGEMENT FUND — $150,000 · Philanthropy+12 more — $478,836 · Philanthropy+12 moreOVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC — $1,150,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC — $485,000 · Youth DevelopmentLEADERSUP — $200,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG GENERATION MOVEMENT INC — $115,000 · Youth DevelopmentUPROSE INC — $100,000 · Youth Development+7 more — $131,500 · Youth DevelopmentA NEW WAY OF LIFE REENTRY PROJECT — $1,375,000 · HealthLAKOTA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT — $150,000 · HealthCOLORADO BLACK HEALTH COLLABORATIVE — $126,500 · HealthCalifornia Pan-Ethnic Health Network — $80,000 · HealthCoalition for Food and Health Equity INC — $70,000 · Health+4 more — $126,000 · HealthURGE UNITE FOR REPRODUCTIVE & GENDER EQUITY — $450,000 · Civil RightsBOLD TRAINING INSTITUTE INC — $380,000 · Civil RightsWE ARE FAMILY FOUNDATION — $300,000 · Civil RightsCIVIL RIGHTS CORPS — $200,000 · Civil RightsMUSLIM ANTI-RACISM COLLABORATIVE — $165,000 · Civil RightsSPARK REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE NOW — $160,000 · Civil Rights+4 more — $105,000 · Civil RightsTABERNACLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $415,000 · Community ImprovementTHE MARSHALL PROJECT INC — $300,000 · Community ImprovementTHE LADIES OF HOPE MINISTRIES INC — $200,000 · Community ImprovementNative American food sovereignty alliance dba NAFSA — $195,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITIES FOR BETTER HEALTH — $180,000 · Community ImprovementTHE BLACK COLLECTIVE INC — $165,000 · Community ImprovementALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETY — $160,000 · Community Improvement+3 more — $8,250 · Community ImprovementTHE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION — $835,000 · OtherTHE ANTI-RECIDIVIS…CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM FOUNDATION — $250,000 · OtherJULIAN — $425,000 · OtherJULIANNational Cares Mentoring Movement Inc — $250,000 · OtherHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $760,000 · OtherHIGHLANDER RESEARC…WEST AFRICA VOCATIONAL EDUCATION INC — $200,000 · Other+51 more — $2,910,686 · Other+51 more
Arts & Culture$12,246,299Education$5,888,100Philanthropy$3,428,836Youth Development$2,181,500Health$1,927,500Civil Rights$1,760,000Community Improvement$1,623,250Other$5,630,686

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEFFORTS OF GRACE INC — $3,505,000 over 4y, 40% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $3,048,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $1,750,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBOREALIS PHILANTHROPY — $1,500,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetARRAY ALLIANCE INC — $1,400,000 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetA NEW WAY OF LIFE REENTRY PROJECT — $1,375,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetOVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC — $1,150,000 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetBARD COLLEGE — $975,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION — $835,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSIC — $800,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $760,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetBLACK ALLIANCE FOR JUST IMMIGRATION — $750,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetHIDDEN GENIUS PROJECT — $650,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetTHE MUSEUM FOR AFRICAN ART D/B/A THE AFRICA CENTER — $500,000 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetGENDER AMPLIFIED — $500,000 over 3y, 82% of budgetBEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE — $500,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetTHE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC — $485,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetURGE UNITE FOR REPRODUCTIVE & GENDER EQUITY — $450,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetJULIAN — $425,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetGIRLS MAKE BEATS INC — $415,000 over 3y, 32% of budgetTABERNACLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $415,000 over 3y, 9.6% of budgetAFRICAN LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $400,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetVisual Arts Research and Resource Center Relating — $387,849 over 2y, 10% of budgetBOLD TRAINING INSTITUTE INC — $380,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetTHE MARSHALL PROJECT INC — $300,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetFLAMBOYAN FOUNDATION INC — $300,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTHE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM — $300,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWE ARE FAMILY FOUNDATION — $300,000 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetREHABILITATION THROUGH THE ARTS INC — $275,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetDANCE THEATRE OF HARLEM INC — $250,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetNational Cares Mentoring Movement Inc — $250,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetMANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP FOR TOMORROW — $250,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPREP FOR PREP — $250,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICA ISRAEL DEMOCRACY COALITION — $250,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCHICAGO FREEDOM SCHOOL — $220,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetLEADERSUP — $200,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetCIVIL RIGHTS CORPS — $200,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetUNMANAGEABLE — $200,000 over 1y, 53% of budgetTHE LADIES OF HOPE MINISTRIES INC — $200,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetNative American food sovereignty alliance dba NAFSA — $195,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOR BETTER HEALTH — $180,000 over 3y, 38% of budgetTHE LIGHTHOUSE BLACK GIRL PROJECT — $175,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetNO LABEL MEDIA GROUP INC — $175,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetBLACKSPACE URBANIST COLLECTIVE INC — $170,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetTHE HIP HOP MUSEUM — $165,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetTHE BLACK COLLECTIVE INC — $165,000 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetMUSLIM ANTI-RACISM COLLABORATIVE — $165,000 over 3y, 18% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ford FoundationTides FoundationAmalgamated Charitabl…Rockefeller Philanthr…Common Counsel Founda…Novo FoundationMs Foundation for Wom…Proteus Fund IncImpactassetsincNew York Women's Foun…The Andrew W Mellon F…Solidaire Network Inc
The Ford FoundationNY49.7× affinity39 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ford Foundation · Tides Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Common Counsel Foundation · Novo Foundation · Ms Foundation for Women Inc · Proteus Fund Inc · Impactassetsinc · New York Women's Foundation Inc · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · Solidaire Network Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Moore Impact Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 38%
  • Ironbound Community Corporation — 100% of income from government
  • New Jersey Environmental Justice Alliance — 39% of income from government
  • Newark Community Street Team Inc — 38% of income from government
  • Young Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Maven Leadership Collective — 3% of income from government
  • Girls Make Beats Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
39report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Moore Impact Inc?

Find your warmest path to Moore Impact Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 164 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines