· Public charity
St John's Community Health
To improve community health and reduce health disparities by delivering high quality, comprehensive services and impacting health and social policy.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $708,824 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $797,555 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $88,731 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k10 grants · $221k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
- $250k+1 grant · $388k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMPTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT | $387,660 |
| CALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION | $100,000 |
| FRIENDS OF COMPTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 2024 | $49,500 |
| UNIQUE WOMAN'S COALITION | $30,218 |
| PROGRAM FOR TORTURE VICTIMS | $25,001 |
| EXPERTS UNITED FOR HOMELESSNESS | $25,000 |
| BLACK AIDS INSTITUTE | $20,645 |
| TRANSGENDER HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER | $20,500 |
| THE LOS ANGELES TRUST FOR CHILDRENS HEALTH | $15,500 |
| IMPERIAL COURT OF LOS ANGELES | $14,800 |
| ALIANZA TRANSLATINX | $10,000 |
| ESPERANZA COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $897k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +44% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $185k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SSAJE7× · 2017–2023 · $1.2M · revenue +44%
- TATHE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION3× · 2020–2023 · $548k · revenue +176%
- PFProgram for Torture Victims8× · 2017–2024 · $533k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- CCCARE CONSULTING GROUPone grant, 2022 · $258k
- SCSOUTH CENTRAL FAMILY HEALTH CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +53%
VENICE FAMILY CLINICgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +56%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote health equity by advocating for public policies and sufficient resources to address the health needs of communities of color.
Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.
The center provides a place of community to end isolation, build relationships, and introduce housing, health and wellness services to adult individuals experiencing homelessness in hollywood. it contracts with public and non-profit grant…
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.
See schedule oour mission is to provide quality, affordable, community-sensitive health care and other services to the underserved communities of greater los angeles, regardless of their ability to pay, by upholding the legacy and…
The mission of laguna beach community clinic (lbcc) is to provide excellent medical care regardless of the patient's ability to pay.
Mental health services advocacy
Apla health restores dignity and trust within underserved communities by providing world-class lgbtq+ empowering healthcare, hiv specialty care, food, housing and other essential support services.
Family health care centers of greater los angeles aims to enchance the quality of life for men, women, and children in the greater los angeles through the provision of high quality, accessible and affordable health care services.
Ccalac empowers community health centers to remain at the forefront of health care transformation. we forge partnerships, foster innovation, promote health equity, and advocate for the communities they serve.
strengthening the leadership and workforce skills of Day Laborers and Domestic Workers. through 5 Day Labor Centers, Workers Health Program & Mujeres en Accion using Education & outreach empowerment tools
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is East Valley Community Health Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Imperial Court of Los Angeles Hollywood. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAJE ↗
- Who funds THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION ↗
- Who funds Program for Torture Victims ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds HOMIES UNIDOS INC ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN AMERICAN AIDS POLICY AND TRAINING INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds ESPERANZA COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds SUNRISE COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TARZANA TREATMENT CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC ↗
- Who funds Unique Womans Coalition ↗
- Who funds SOUTH CENTRAL FAMILY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds JWCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds EL PROYECTO DEL BARRIO INC ↗
- Who funds EAST VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CLINIC 'SERVING CHILDREN AND THEIR FAMILIES' ↗
- Who funds STUDENT HEALTH SERVICES SUPPORT FUND INC dba The LA Trust ↗
- Who funds COMUNIDADES INDIGENAS EN LIDERAZGO CORP ↗
- Who funds SOLIDARITY ↗
- Who funds TRANSGENDER HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER ↗
- Who funds EXPERTS UNITED FOR HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds IMPERIAL COURT OF LOS ANGELES HOLLYWOOD ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OUTSIDE IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY ↗
- Who funds KINGDOM CAUSES BELLFLOWER ↗
- Who funds Neighborhood Legal Services of Los Angeles County ↗
- Who funds ONE LA-IAF ↗
- Who funds ALIANZA TRANSLATINX ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Weingart Foundation · Community Partners · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The California Endowment · Durfee Foundation · Direct Relief · California Healthcare Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization St John's Community Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.