· Private foundation
Virginia Nonprofit Housing Coalition
THE ORGANIZATION'S MISSION IS FOR CHARITABLE AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 501(C)(3), INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, FOSTERING LOW-INCOME AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSING, MAKING GIFTS AND GRANTS TO OTHER SECTION 501(C)(3) ORGANIZATIONS AND AWARDING HIGHER EDUCATION SCHOLARSHIPS TO CHILDREN OF RESIDENTS OF THE HOUSING…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k26 grants · $752k
- $50k–250k56 grants · $4.3M
- $250k+9 grants · $3.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST JOSEPH'S VILLA | $484,250 |
| BETTER HOUSING COALITION | $360,000 |
| CARITAS | $350,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $315,000 |
| YWCA OF RICHMOND | $311,500 |
| VCU SCHOOL OF BUSINESS | $300,000 |
| J SARGEANT REYNOLDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $300,000 |
| FIRST TEE OF RICHMOND | $300,000 |
| MAGGIE WALKER COMMUNITY LAND TRUST | $275,000 |
| SACRED HEART CENTER | $175,000 |
| HOMEAGAIN | $170,000 |
| GOOCHLAND CARES | $150,000 |
| HUMANKIND | $110,900 |
| FRIENDS ASSOCIATION FOR CHILDREN | $110,000 |
| ACTS AREA CONGREEGATIONS & TOGETHER IN SERVICE | $110,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $7.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
123 repeat relationships — 76 still active in FY2024, 47 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YRYWCA RICHMOND8× · 2017–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +190%
- SJST JOSEPH'S VILLA6× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +48%
- TCTHE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC7× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +140%
Funded once
- VCVIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $1.3M · revenue +46%
- VFVCU FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $306k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $239k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Habitat for Humanity Virginia provides support to Virginia affiliates so that they can build or facilitate affordable housing by offering advocacy, organizational development, funding, and resource development
Virginia community action partnership (vacap) is the statewide membership association for virginia's thirty-one non-profit and public community action agencies. vacaps mission is to build the capacity and competencies of virginias…
To use policy, research, and analysis to advance the well-being of Virginia communities, and improve the economic security and social opportunities of all Virginians.
To establish an effective, long-term and resilient political infrastructure that advocates for and delivers public policy victories which reflect the values held in common by our members.
Chamberrva is the trusted voice for modern business in the richmond virginia region. we are change agents, rallying to do the hard things that will create a more connected, prosperous, health and equitable community.
To use the power of media to educate, entertain and inspire, using public television and public radio to make a positive impact on the communities throughout central virginia, charlottesville, the shenandoah valley, the northern neck and…
Virginia poverty law center uses advocacy, education, and litigation to break down systemic barriers that keep low-income virginians in the cycle of poverty.
To provide investment and investment management and related services to the rector and the board of visitors of virginia commonwealth university (vcu), and/or to the private and independent foundations and other entities affiliated with…
The legal aid justice center partners with communities and clients to achieve justice by dismantling systems that create and perpetuate poverty.
GRP's mission is to aggressively generate economic opportunities that create quality jobs for residents in the region and increase the tax base for needed community services.
Richmond County Partnership for Children advances a high-quality, accountable system of care and early education for each child beginning with a healthy birth, and supports families to improve early childhood health and development to…
Central virginia housing coalition improves the regional quality of life by providing affordable housing opportunities to low income families through coalition, education, counseling, and financial assistance.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater Richmond & Petersburg and the most unlike its peers is Everhart Primary Health Care. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
151 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 151 of the 210 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YWCA RICHMOND ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH'S VILLA ↗
- Who funds THE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds SupportWorks Housing ↗
- Who funds CARITAS ↗
- Who funds ELDERHOMES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE MAGGIE WALKER COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds FEED MORE INC ↗
- Who funds SACRED HEART CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BETTER HOUSING COALITION ↗
- Who funds HOMEWARD ↗
- Who funds RICHMOND METRO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds GoochlandCares ↗
- Who funds Children's Museum of Richmond ↗
- Who funds CHILDSAVERS- MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL OF CENTRAL AND COASTAL VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds Partnership for Housing Affordability ↗
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN HOMES & FAMILY SVCS ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS ASSOCIATION FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds DAILY PLANET INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Emergency Shelter Inc ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSING FAMILIES FIRST ↗
- Who funds PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY LIFELINE ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Virginia Center for Inclusive Communities ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - POWHATAN ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds LIBERATION VETERAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTH BRIGADE ↗
- Who funds HANOVER AND KING WILLIAM HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO RICHMOND ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · Richmond Memorial Health Foundation · Herndon Foundation · The Pauley Family Foundation · Robins Foundation · The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Robert G Cabell III and Maude Morgan Cabell Foundation · Carmax Foundation · United Way of Greater Richmond & Petersburg · Shelton H Short Jr Trust · Annabella R Jenkins Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Virginia Nonprofit Housing Coalition funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Continuum of Care Inc — 100% of income from government
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Virginia Nonprofit Housing Coalition?
Find your warmest path to Virginia Nonprofit Housing Coalition through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.