How much did BROOKFIELD INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 64% of BROOKFIELD INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

richmond

2020

—

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

2024

richmond

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k2 grants · $80k
$50k–250k7 grants · $495k

$60,000

Median grant

States reached

$12M

Total assets

Largest grants

GREATER RICHMOND SCAN$100,000
VIRGINIA CENTER FOR INCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES$100,000
CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF VA$75,000
UNITED METHODIST FAMILY SERVICES$60,000
CHALLENGE DISCOVERY$60,000
NEIGHBORHOOD RESOURCE CENTER$50,000
THE READ CENTER$50,000
METROPOLITAN RICHMOND SPORTS BACKERS$40,000
LIBERATION INC$40,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $325k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 11%. 43% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.6M · 23 repeat orgs$790k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.6M

$635k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%

+41%

Still filing today

43%

58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $155k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentReligionCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

GR
GREATER RICHMOND SCAN
3× · 2019–2024 · $220k · revenue +76%
SH
SACRED HEART CENTER
3× · 2019–2023 · $180k · revenue +79%
PF
PARTNERSHIP FOR THE FUTURE
2× · 2017–2022 · $120k · revenue +118%

Funded once

CI
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF RICHMONDgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +45%
EH
ELK HILL FARMgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $70k · revenue +41%
PP
PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER
one grant, 2023 · $65k · revenue -1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Richmond Forum

To present powerful voices so richmond can learn. to empower local voices so richmond can lead

—

Richmond County Partnership for Children Inc

Richmond County Partnership for Children advances a high-quality, accountable system of care and early education for each child beginning with a healthy birth, and supports families to improve early childhood health and development to…

Education

Community Health Center of Richmond Inc

To provide quality health care and specialty services that are affordable and accessible.

Health

Good Shepherd Episcopal School

The mission of Good Shepherd Episcopal School is to inspire each child to achieve academic excellence within a diverse, nurturing community that builds character and fosters respect for one another and our shared environment, locally and…

Education

Sbc Community Development Corporation of Richmond Heights

To build a better community through collaborative efforts and partnership that provides programs and services to address the intergenerational needs of the community.

Community Improvement

Richmond Friends School Inc

Committed to providing a quality educational experience for each child, creating an environment that nutures individual intellectual, emotional, creative, spiritual, and physical gifts within a community.

Education

Fauquier Community Child Care Inc

To provide continuous high quality, affordable, accessible, licensed care to meet the out of school time needs of children in fauquier county public schools within a nurturing environment that encourages children to grow, interact and…

Human Services

Virginia Early Childhood Foundation

Vecf is the non-partisan steward of virginia's promise for early childhood success.

Education

Cristo Rey Richmond High School Inc

A Catholic learning community that educates young people of limited economic means to become people of faith, purpose and service. Through a rigorous college preparatory curriculum, integrated with a relevant work study experience,…

Education

New Schools for Virginia

New schools of virginia creates more high quality educational opportunities for youth and families in virginia.

Education

Richmond Residential Services Inc

Providing person-centered care for individuals with diverse abilities

Human Services

Greater Richmond Partnership Inc

Grp's purpose is to promote the economic development of the richmond metropolitan area in cooperation with member local governments. more specifically, grp's purpose is to (i) attract new businesses and industries within the jurisdiction…

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communities in Schools of Richmond Inc and the most unlike its peers is Grasp Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

18/18

Grantees still filing

11/18

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,959,000Human Services$325,000Crime & Legal$320,000Civil Rights$285,000Youth Development$180,000Recreation & Sports$171,750Philanthropy$120,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation IncVA36× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · Virginia Nonprofit Housing Coalition · Richmond Memorial Health Foundation · Herndon Foundation · Robins Foundation · The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Carmax Foundation · Bon Secours - Richmond Health System Inc · Robert G Cabell III and Maude Morgan · The Jackson Foundation · Bon Secours - St Mary's Hospital of Richmond Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation BROOKFIELD INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GRASP.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~2 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 5.7× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 161497039 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on GRASP, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 52% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Brookfield Inc?

Find your warmest path to Brookfield Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

BROOKFIELD INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Brookfield Inc?

More from the funding graph

BROOKFIELD INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Brookfield Inc?

More from the funding graph