· Private foundation
Tua Anne M Orrell Charitable
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $4k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $65k
- $50k–250k27 grants · $3.2M
- $250k+3 grants · $900k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL | $400,000 |
| VIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $250,000 |
| BETTER HOUSING COALITION | $250,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO RICHMOND | $200,000 |
| THOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY | $200,000 |
| PATHWAY HOMES INC | $175,000 |
| ST JOSEPH'S VILLA | $160,000 |
| INOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| MCV FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| CITY OF PROMISE INC | $150,000 |
| BRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY | $125,000 |
| FORKIDS INC | $125,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL VA | $125,000 |
| SACRED HEART CENTER INC | $125,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
21 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC3× · 2023–2025 · $500k · revenue +56%
- VHVirginia Health Care Foundation4× · 2022–2025 · $475k · revenue +20%
- ASARMED SERVICES YMCA OF THE USA2× · 2023–2025 · $300k · revenue +119%
Funded once
- SHSupportWorks Housingone grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -11%
- GCGRAYSON COUNTY RELIEF FUNDone grant, 2024 · $200k
- TTTRAILS TO RECOVERYone grant, 2024 · $200k · 100% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of transitions family violence services (tfvs) is to build safe and healthy families on the virginia peninsula by providing services to adult and child victims of domestic violence and human trafficking. we work to increase…
To provide excellence in the delivery of healthcare.
To provide quality, compassionate human services to all people, especially the most vulnerable, regardless of faith, by empowering individuals, streghening families and building community through faith and service.
To deliver important healthcare services with exceptional quality and patient-centered care.
Virginia community action partnership (vacap) is the statewide membership association for virginia's thirty-one non-profit and public community action agencies. vacaps mission is to build the capacity and competencies of virginias…
The mission is to bring compassion to health care and to be good to those in need, especially those who are poor and dying. as a system of caregivers, we commit ourselves to help bring people and communities to health and wholeness.
The organization's mission is to sustain a vibrant, healthy and strong community through affordable, culturally competent, quality primary health care.
To provide investment and investment management and related services to the rector and the board of visitors of virginia commonwealth university (vcu), and/or to the private and independent foundations and other entities affiliated with…
Safe harbor provides the support that survivors of sexual and domestic violence and human trafficking need to overcome their crisis and to transform their lives.
The mission of the organization is to provide physicians and other healthcare professionals to support the needs of the community, as well as the academic mission of the vcu school of medicine.
See schedule ohealth brigade offers an integrated, comprehensive, creative approach to health and wellness. we not only meet the clinical quality standards of the traditional health system, but we often exceed them in compassion, care…
Vcu health children's services at brook road (csbr), fka crippled children's hospital, is a resource and provider of specialized medical services customized to meet the specific needs of children and their families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Path Partnerships and the most unlike its peers is The Claude Moore Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds Virginia Health Care Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHILDSAVERS- MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds LIBERATION VETERAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds INOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARMED SERVICES YMCA OF THE USA ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO RICHMOND ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Whaley Children's Center Inc ↗
- Who funds BRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds FORKIDS INC ↗
- Who funds BETTER HOUSING COALITION ↗
- Who funds THE CLAUDE MOORE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SupportWorks Housing ↗
- Who funds SACRED HEART CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TRAILS TO RECOVERY ↗
- Who funds THE BRIDGE MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDS OF FOSTER CARE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds RICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds PATHWAY HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH'S VILLA ↗
- Who funds CITY OF PROMISE INC ↗
- Who funds CHARLOTTESVILLE FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds THRIVE PENINSULA FORMERLY DUCO ↗
- Who funds BLACK HISTORY MUSEUM & CLT CTR ↗
- Who funds GLOUCESTER-MATHEWS HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CARITAS ↗
- Who funds DEPAUL COMMUNITY RESOURCES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Sentara Health · Richmond Memorial Health Foundation · The Community Foundation Inc · Virginia Nonprofit Housing Coalition · Robins Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · The Titmus Foundation · The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation · Tr R & Ct Gwathmey Mem Uw Egj · The Pauley Family Foundation · Williams Mullen Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tua Anne M Orrell Charitable funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.