· Private foundation
Shelton H Short Jr Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k66 grants · $1.1M
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CARITAS | $50,000 |
| CHALLENGE DISCOVERY PROJECTS INC | $40,000 |
| DANVILLE COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL | $40,000 |
| CLARKSVILLE RURITANS INC | $35,000 |
| CHILDSAVERS | $30,000 |
| ANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOL | $30,000 |
| SOUTHSIDE VIRGINIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $30,000 |
| THE FAISON CENTER INC | $25,000 |
| READING AND EDUCATION FOR ADULT | $25,000 |
| FEED MORE INC | $25,000 |
| COMMONWEALTH CATHOLIC CHARITIES | $25,000 |
| GATEWAY HOMES INC | $25,000 |
| HOUSING FAMILIES FIRST | $20,000 |
| FRIENDS ASSOCIATION FOR CHILDREN | $20,000 |
| BETTER HOUSING COALITION | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.
90 repeat relationships — 61 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RCRANDOLPH-MACON COLLEGE4× · 2017–2020 · $850k · revenue +51%
- CRCLARKSVILLE RURITANS INC8× · 2017–2024 · $385k · revenue +37%
- CDCHALLENGE DISCOVERY PROJECTS INC7× · 2017–2024 · $370k · revenue +21%
Funded once
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue +55%- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $50k
- SVSOUTHSIDE VIRGINIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +110%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of voices for virginia's children is to champion public policies and legislation that achieve positive and equitable outcomes for young people.
To provide investment and investment management and related services to the rector and the board of visitors of virginia commonwealth university (vcu), and/or to the private and independent foundations and other entities affiliated with…
Chamberrva is the trusted voice for modern business in the richmond virginia region. we are change agents, rallying to do the hard things that will create a more connected, prosperous, health and equitable community.
The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…
To use the power of media to educate, entertain and inspire, using public television and public radio to make a positive impact on the communities throughout central virginia, charlottesville, the shenandoah valley, the northern neck and…
New schools for virginia works with parents, students, educators and the community to improve educational outcomes by designing new schools and by supporting existing schools to improve outcomes.
To use policy, research, and analysis to advance the well-being of Virginia communities, and improve the economic security and social opportunities of all Virginians.
Working within the faith community to educate and mobilize citizen to create systemic social change for low income Virginians.
Board approved mission is "to put christian principles into practice through programs that build a healthy spirit, mind, body for all"
Virginia mentoring partnership provides training and technical assistance to mentors and mentoring programs to increase the quality and quantity of mentoring for virginia's youth. the vision of vmp is that every child who needs a mentor…
Committed to providing a quality educational experience for each child, creating an environment that nurtures individual intellectual, emotional, creative, spiritual, and physical gifts within a community
The organization's mission is to sustain a vibrant, healthy and strong community through affordable, culturally competent, quality primary health care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Commonwealth Catholic Charities and the most unlike its peers is Clarksville Volunteer Fire Department Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
110 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 110 of the 148 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RANDOLPH-MACON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE VIRGINIA COLLEGE FUND ↗
- Who funds CLARKSVILLE RURITANS INC ↗
- Who funds CHALLENGE DISCOVERY PROJECTS INC ↗
- Who funds CARITAS ↗
- Who funds St Andrew's School ↗
- Who funds CHILDSAVERS- MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH'S VILLA ↗
- Who funds PETER PAUL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Richmond (6769) ↗
- Who funds LAKE COUNTRY SPCA ↗
- Who funds BETTER HOUSING COALITION ↗
- Who funds NORTHSTAR ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS ASSOCIATION FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL VA INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE SKY FUND ↗
- Who funds SAFE HARBOR ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds FEED MORE INC ↗
- Who funds GoochlandCares ↗
- Who funds POSITIVE VIBE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEXTUP RVA ↗
- Who funds Cristo Rey Richmond High School Inc ↗
- Who funds THE STEWARD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ART 180 Inc ↗
- Who funds HOUSING FAMILIES FIRST ↗
- Who funds THE RICHMOND SYMPHONY ↗
- Who funds Commonwealth Catholic Charities ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CRATER COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · Herndon Foundation · Robins Foundation · The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation · The Pauley Family Foundation · Richard S Reynolds Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Richmond Memorial Health Foundation · Virginia Nonprofit Housing Coalition · The William H - John G - Emma Scott Foundation · Robert G Cabell III and Maude Morgan Cabell Foundation · Coleman a Hunter - Irr Tr Chari
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Shelton H Short Jr Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.