Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Tua August Heid by T Heid Char

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$904k
Granted FY2026still arriving
14
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182026.

Environment$5.1MHealth$2.9MAnimals$790kHuman Services$650kArts & Culture$394kEducation$300kPhilanthropy$150kFood & Nutrition$75kOther$0
02FY2026 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k1 grant · $4k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $760k
$75,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATURE CONSERVANCY$100,000
PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL$100,000
CHARLOTTESVILLE-ALBEMARLE SPCA$100,000
CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION$100,000
MARTHA JEFFERSON HOSPITAL$100,000
CHARLOTTESVILLE FREE CLINIC$85,000
CARING FOR CREATURES FOUNDATION$75,000
CHILDSAVERS$50,000
PATRICK HENRY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$50,000
JAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION$40,000
LEWIS GINTER BOTANTICAL GARDEN INC$40,000
WILD VIRGINIA INCORPORATED$35,000
WARD BURTON WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$25,000
PATH PARTNERSHIPS$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $375k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ST JOSEPH'S VILLA: $175k → 9%ST JOSEPH'S VILLA: $100k → 9%SHALOM FARMS: $50k → 9%SPORTABLE: $25k → 9%SHALOM FARMS: $25k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.8M · 20 repeat orgs$548k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2026, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
7

Total granted

$8.8M
$409k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+76%

Still filing today

85%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $139k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EnvironmentHealthAnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL
    9× · 2018–2026 · $1.1M · revenue +94%
  • MJ
    MARTHA JEFFERSON HOSPITAL
    8× · 2018–2026 · $1.1M · revenue +30%
  • CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2018–2026 · $975k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • CB
    COLONIAL BEHAVIORIAL HEALTH
    one grant, 2024 · $150k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FOREST FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $108k · revenue +67%
  • MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +76%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alliance for the Shenandoah Valley

Alliance for the shenandoah valley informs and engages people to protect the natural resources, cultural heritages, and rural character of our region.

Community Improvement
2
Virginia Environmental Endowment

The endowment's mission is to improve the quality of the environment by using its capital, expertise, and resources to fund projects and programs that encourage all sectors to work together to prevent pollution, improve water quality,…

Environment
3
Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation

The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…

Health
4
Virginia Living Museum Inc

The museum connects people to nature by delivering educational classes, programs, exhibits, events and demonstrations. staff and volunteers engage learners of all ages on a 23 acre campus setting. indoor and outdoor learning opportunities…

Arts & Culture
5
Virginias United Land Trusts

Virginias United Land Trusts was founded to promote conservation statewide and to coordinate conservation planning and green infrastructure. The Organization offers training and educational programs, like our annual Virginia Land…

Environment
6
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
7
Vcu Investment Management Company

To provide investment and investment management and related services to the rector and the board of visitors of virginia commonwealth university (vcu), and/or to the private and independent foundations and other entities affiliated with…

Education
8
Virginia Coalition for Progressive Values

To establish an effective, long-term and resilient political infrastructure that advocates for and delivers public policy victories which reflect the values held in common by our members.

9
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
10
Virginia Community Action Partnership Inc

Virginia community action partnership (vacap) is the statewide membership association for virginia's thirty-one non-profit and public community action agencies. vacaps mission is to build the capacity and competencies of virginias…

Human Services
11
Virginia Association of Museums

The virginia association of museums is a statewide network serving the museum community. the association's mission statement is "the virginia association of museums helps our museum community succeed".

Arts & Culture
12
Virginia Conservation Network

Vcn is a facilitator of strategic action, a resource for network partners statewide, and a constant preservation presence in richmond. playing a unique role in virginia's conservation community, vcn helps the community speak with one…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Path Partnerships and the most unlike its peers is Caring for Creatures Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%7%5–10yr18%14%10–20yr17%28%20–35yr16%28%35–55yr14%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr18%2%10–20yr17%19%20–35yr16%34%35–55yr14%44%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
12%
2,471/20,403

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
24/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL — $1,125,000 · EnvironmentTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCILCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC — $975,000 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INCJAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION — $540,000 · EnvironmentJAMES RIVER ASSOCIATIONNatureServe — $525,000 · EnvironmentNatureServeEARTH DAY NETWORK INC — $350,000 · EnvironmentEARTH DAY NETWORK INCLEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $340,000 · EnvironmentLEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INCResources for the Future Inc — $144,624 · Environment+3 more — $168,350 · EnvironmentTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $921,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYSHELTRING ARMS FOUNDATION — $668,000 · OtherSHELTRING ARMS FOUNDATIONHEALTH BRIGADE — $375,000 · OtherHEALTH BRIGADECHILDSAVERS- MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC — $350,000 · OtherCHILDSAVERS- MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDA…UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA — $300,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIAALBERMARLE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION — $225,000 · OtherALBERMARLE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVEN…COLONIAL BEHAVIORIAL HEALTH — $150,000 · Other+5 more — $130,000 · OtherMARTHA JEFFERSON HOSPITAL — $1,050,000 · HealthMARTHA JEFFERSO…Virginia Health Care Foundation — $255,000 · HealthVirginia Health…CHARLOTTESVILLE FREE CLINIC — $135,000 · HealthCHARLOTTESVILLE…ALBEMARLE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC — $400,000 · AnimalsDefenders of Wildlife — $300,000 · AnimalsCaring For Creatures Foundation — $75,000 · AnimalsPATRICK HENRY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC — $394,000 · Arts & CultureST JOSEPH'S VILLA — $275,000 · Human ServicesSHALOM FARMSINC — $75,000 · Human ServicesSPORTABLE RICHMOND ADAPTIVE SPORTS AND RECREATION INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesCAPITA SOCIAL INC — $150,000 · Philanthropy
Environment$4,167,974Other$3,119,000Health$1,440,000Animals$775,000Arts & Culture$394,000Human Services$375,000Philanthropy$150,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL — $1,125,000 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetMARTHA JEFFERSON HOSPITAL — $1,050,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC — $975,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $921,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION — $540,000 over 6y, 7.0% of budgetNatureServe — $525,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetALBEMARLE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC — $400,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetPATRICK HENRY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC — $394,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetHEALTH BRIGADE — $375,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetCHILDSAVERS- MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC — $350,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetEARTH DAY NETWORK INC — $350,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetLEWIS GINTER BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $340,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife — $300,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetST JOSEPH'S VILLA — $275,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetVirginia Health Care Foundation — $255,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCAPITA SOCIAL INC — $150,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetResources for the Future Inc — $144,624 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCHARLOTTESVILLE FREE CLINIC — $135,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetAMERICAN FOREST FOUNDATION — $108,350 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSHALOM FARMSINC — $75,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetMEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOAST GUARD MUTUAL ASSISTANCE — $36,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSPORTABLE RICHMOND ADAPTIVE SPORTS AND RECREATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetAUTISM SOCIETY OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA CHAPTER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dominion Energy Charitable FoundationVA21.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Sentara Health · Shelton H Short Jr Trust · The Community Foundation Inc · Tua Anne M Orrell Charitable · Richmond Memorial Health Foundation · Carmax Foundation · Estes Foundation Co Matthew Breidenbach Pitcairn · McKesson Foundation Inc · Annabella R Jenkins Foundation · Bon Secours - Richmond Health System Inc · Virginia Nonprofit Housing Coalition

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tua August Heid by T Heid Char funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph