Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

The Tony Robbins Foundation

We're dedicated to creating positive changes in the lives of youth, seniors, the hungry, homeless and the imprisoned population, all who need a boost envisioning a happier and deeply satisfying way of life.

$3.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$522k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.

Arts & Culture$3.9MHuman Services$2.6MFood & Nutrition$2.0MEducation$1.2MHousing & Shelter$1.2MInternational$1.0MPublic Safety & Disaster$968kEnvironment$670kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 19 grants below total $2,846,075 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,920,008 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,073,933 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $111k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $713k
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.0M
$75,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARICI$521,739
DREAM CENTER FOUNDATION$500,000
BEYGOOD FOUNDATION$500,000
AIRBNBORG INC$250,000
THE FARMLINK PROJECT$250,000
LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION$200,000
ACADEMY PREP FOUNDATION$100,000
FRATERNITE OF NOTRE DAME$88,343
ABERCROMBIE & KENT PHILANTHROPY INC$84,993
SHARING EXCESS INC$75,000
DURHAM CENTER FOR SENIOR LIFE$65,000
NO LIMITS THEATER GROUP INC$50,000
TD JAKES FOUNDATION$50,000
HUNGER RELIEF INTERNATIONAL INC$36,000
BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $3.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%CONEJO VALLEY SENIOR: $20k → 10%SAINT JOHNS PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $10k → 12%THE HOMELESS COALITION: $35k → 17%THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $75k → 21%THE WORLD ORPHAN FUND INC: $10k → 8%LOVE LIGHT MELODY: $25k → 12%JOURNEYS THE ROAD HOME: $15k → 14%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $20k → 9%A KID'S PLACE OF TAMPA BAY: $10k → 13%THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $10k → 21%MARICI: $522k → 10%WHEELCHAIRS 4 KIDS INC: $10k → 12%MARICI: $506k → 10%MARICI: $501k → 10%DREAM CENTER FOUNDATION: $500k → 14%MARICI: $500k → 10%MARICI: $300k → 10%NEW STORY INC: $500k → 10%THE FARMLINK PROJECT: $250k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
WY
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
HI
OK
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $1.0M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

South Asia$1.0M · 96% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: EDUCATION

East Asia and the Pacific$32k · 3% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: YOUTH

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$9k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: UNDERSERVED WOMEN

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 20 repeat orgs$4.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +74% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
54

Total granted

$12M
$2.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+17%

Still filing today

90%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OR
    OUR RESCUE
    4× · 2018–2021 · $3.7M · revenue +102%
  • M
    MARICI
    5× · 2020–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +198%
  • EG
    EMBRACE GLOBAL
    2× · 2022–2024 · $884k · revenue +74% · 47% of their budget

Funded once

  • NS
    NEW STORY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $500k · revenue +4%
  • PH
    PERUVIAN HEARTS
    one grant, 2020 · $255k · revenue +7% · 64% of their budget
  • FK
    FIVE KEYS SCHOOLS AND PROGRAMSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue +130%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
2
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
3
Pact Inc

Pact is a nonprofit organization that builds evidence-based, data-driven, and community-led solutions for human development (continued in schedule o)

International
4
Hollywood Food Coalition

Hollywood food coalition welcomes people to dinner each night. we rescue and redistribute food daily to other organizations. we care for our immediate community through our wellness program. we build community with and through our…

—
5
Extrafood

Food Rescue - The Organization rescues excess fresh food from Bay Area businesses, schools and non-profits and immediately delivers the food to safety net partners - such as senior housing centers, after-school programs, and homeless…

Food & Nutrition
6
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
7
Youthbuild Global Inc

With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…

Employment
8
Think Big for Kids Inc

Think big for kids is breaking the cycle of poverty by providing middle and high school students with career opportunities, mentorship, and job readiness training to excel in today's workforce.

Youth Development
9
Opportunity Partners

Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…

Employment
10
Pathways Kitchen

Pathways kitchen helps justice-impacted youth thrive over survive by providing training, work opportunities and individualized support to ensure they can chart their own path forward

Crime & Legal
11
Pact Institute

Pact institute works to achieve strategic objectives that improve the lives of people around the world who are poor and marginalized through innovation, the exploration of new approaches and partnerships, and funding diversification. it is…

—
12
Climate Breakthrough Inc

To launch breakthrough climate mitigation efforts by identifying, supporting, and unleashing innovative leaders with transformative strategies.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cambodian Childrens Fund and the most unlike its peers is Street Dreamz Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity Arts CentersCancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Dance Arts OrganizationsYouth Sports ProgramsSenior Support ServicesLocal Food System Organizat…Affordable Housing Developm…Environmental Conservation …Jewish Community Organizati…Community FoundationsVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Christian Missionary Organi…Food Banks and PantriesDomestic Violence Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%5%<5yr15%9%5–10yr20%31%10–20yr17%36%20–35yr11%11%35–55yr13%8%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%8%<5yr15%33%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr17%26%20–35yr11%12%35–55yr13%4%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/88
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,890

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

81 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 81 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
80/81
Grantees still filing
53/81
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MARICI — $2,329,309 · Human ServicesMARICINEW STORY INC — $500,000 · Human ServicesNEW STORY INCDREAM CENTER FOUNDATION — $500,000 · Human ServicesDREAM CENTER FOUNDATIONFARMLINK PROJECT — $500,000 · Human ServicesFARMLINK PROJECT+14 more — $381,602 · Human Services+14 moreOUR RESCUE — $3,654,713 · Arts & CultureOUR RESCUENO LIMITS THEATER GROUP INC — $230,000 · Arts & CultureNO LIMITS THEATER GROUP INC+1 more — $60,000 · Arts & CultureFRATERNITE NOTRE DAME INC — $832,091 · OtherFRATERNITE NOTRE DAME INCTREES FOR THE FUTURE INC — $620,140 · OtherTREES FOR THE FUTURE INCAIRBNBORG INC — $250,000 · OtherAIRBNBORG INCLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION — $200,000 · OtherPERUVIAN HEARTS — $255,200 · OtherPERUVIAN HEARTSX PRIZE FOUNDATION INC — $337,500 · OtherX PRIZE FOUNDATION INCPREVENTIVE MEDICINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $150,000 · OtherPlano Metro Rotary Club — $150,000 · Other+35 more — $1,425,732 · Other+35 moreACADEMY PREP FOUNDATION INC — $350,000 · EducationFIVE KEYS SCHOOLS AND PROGRAMS — $200,000 · EducationACADEMY PREP CENTER OF TAMPA INC — $150,000 · EducationACADEMY PREP CENTER OF ST PETERSBURG — $150,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · EducationALPINE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $57,500 · Education+4 more — $47,500 · EducationBEYGOOD FOUNDATION — $500,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC — $175,000 · PhilanthropyCambodian Childrens Fund — $145,500 · PhilanthropyABERCROMBIE & KENT PHILANTHROPY INC — $84,993 · PhilanthropyPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $20,000 · PhilanthropyEMBRACE GLOBAL — $883,739 · InternationalHUNGER RELIEF INTERNATIONAL INC — $36,000 · International+1 more — $4,514 · InternationalFeeding America — $479,104 · Food & NutritionSHARING EXCESS — $375,000 · Food & Nutrition+3 more — $36,463 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$4,210,911Arts & Culture$3,944,713Other$4,220,663Education$1,055,000Philanthropy$975,493International$924,253Food & Nutrition$890,567

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOUR RESCUE — $3,654,713 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetMARICI — $2,329,309 over 5y, 22% of budgetEMBRACE GLOBAL — $883,739 over 2y, 47% of budgetTREES FOR THE FUTURE INC — $620,140 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetNEW STORY INC — $500,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetDREAM CENTER FOUNDATION — $500,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFARMLINK PROJECT — $500,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFeeding America — $479,104 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHARING EXCESS — $375,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetACADEMY PREP FOUNDATION INC — $350,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetX PRIZE FOUNDATION INC — $337,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetPERUVIAN HEARTS — $255,200 over 1y, 64% of budgetNO LIMITS THEATER GROUP INC — $230,000 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetFIVE KEYS SCHOOLS AND PROGRAMS — $200,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC — $175,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPlano Metro Rotary Club — $150,000 over 5y, 40% of budgetACADEMY PREP CENTER OF TAMPA INC — $150,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetACADEMY PREP CENTER OF ST PETERSBURG — $150,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetPREVENTIVE MEDICINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $150,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCambodian Childrens Fund — $145,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetHOPE FOR PAWS — $100,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EMPOWERMENT PLAN — $85,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetValley Restart Shelter Inc — $80,468 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetZAMBESIA CONSERVATION ALLIANCE INC — $74,307 over 2y, 76% of budgetHO'OLA NA PUA — $67,242 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetDURHAM CENTER FOR SENIOR LIFE — $65,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL RESOURCE & EDUCATION CENTER OF FLORIDA INC — $60,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetALPINE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $57,500 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetMidlands Housing Alliance Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLAFC SPORTS FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetTEXAS DIAPER BANK — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLADIES EMPOWERMENT AND ACTION PROGRAM INC — $50,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetHEALING CALIFORNIA — $50,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetAlliance of Concerned Men — $40,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHOMELESS COALITION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $35,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE GEORGE G GLENNER ALZHEIMER'S FAMILY CENTERS INC — $30,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPlanting Justice — $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWILLIAM WENDT CENTER FOR LOSS AND HEALING — $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMIGHTY WRITERS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBuild Futures — $25,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE LUNCHBOX FUND — $25,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetPINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLOVE LIGHT AND MELODY — $25,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetOperation Warm Inc — $24,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foun…Truist Foundation IncSilicon Valley Commun…JP's Peace Love & Hap…Blue Cross Blue Shiel…The Kroger Co Foundat…The San Diego Foundat…Publix Super Markets …Goodwin Family Memori…The Annenberg Foundat…Vinik Family Foundati…Suncoast Credit Union…
Jewish Community Foundation of San DiegoCA16.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Truist Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · JP's Peace Love & Happiness Foundation · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation · The Kroger Co Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Goodwin Family Memorial Tua · The Annenberg Foundation · Vinik Family Foundation · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Tony Robbins Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • The Petey Greene Program Inc — 29% of income from government
  • Phoenix Programs of Florida Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Academy Prep Center of Tampa Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Tsic Inc Dba/Take Stock in Children — 0% of income from government
  • North Naples Education Center Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Tony Robbins Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Tony Robbins Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 88 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines