· Private foundation
Every Org
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k71 grants · $2.5M
- $50k–250k112 grants · $11M
- $250k+27 grants · $31M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KING BAUDOUIN FOUNDATION UNITED STATES | $7,798,492 |
| TOTAL PAID TO OTHER ORGANIZATIONS UNDER 25K | $6,580,200 |
| PRIESTLY FRATERNITY OF SAINT PETER | $5,047,877 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE EASTERN PANHANDLE | $1,342,682 |
| IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH | $990,618 |
| NATIONAL VETERANS HOMELESS SUPPORT | $981,530 |
| FOUNDERS PLEDGE | $757,630 |
| VETERANS FOR CHILD RESCUE | $704,212 |
| MARANATHA CAMP AND RETREAT CENTER | $616,892 |
| CONGREGATION CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF FLATBUSH | $610,611 |
| Individual grant recipient | $576,466 |
| MULTIDISCIPLINARY ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHEDELIC STUDIES | $541,289 |
| NETWORK FOR GOOD | $474,870 |
| INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE | $437,794 |
| NORTHCROSS LUTHERAN CHURCH | $359,146 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 12% of Every Org’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
100 repeat relationships — 66 still active in FY2024, 34 since wound down; 139 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC4× · 2021–2024 · $589k · revenue +59%
- ACANIMAL CHARITY EVALUATORS4× · 2021–2024 · $526k · revenue +14%
- LBLIL BUBS ANIMAL WELFARE ORGANIZATION4× · 2021–2024 · $482k · revenue +4% · 63% of their budget
Funded once
- NFNETWORK FOR GOODone grant, 2023 · $2.4M
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $970k
- UCUNITED COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $740k · revenue +49%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…
E3g is a leading international not-for-profit think tank specialising in climate diplomacy harnessing expertise in the politics and economics of climate change.
We help the public by foreseeing and reacting to globally impactful and existential catastrophes. We forecast near-term risks, detect black swans earlier, and deploy our emergency response team to take mitigating action.
Upturn advances equity and justice in the design, governance, and use of technology.
The global impact investing network, inc. is dedicated to increasing the scale and effectiveness of impact investing to solve systemic problems facing people and the planet. impact investments are investments made into companies,…
Center for Humane Technology is a nonprofit dedicated to ensuring that the most consequential technologies actually serve humanity. We bring clarity to how the tech ecosystem works in order to shift the incentives that drive it.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
Bringing diverse voices together across global sectors, disciplines, and demographics so developments in ai advance positive outcomes for people and society.
Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
Supporting industry transformation towards climate-positive and make green careers transitions and driving the adoption of green workforce development practices broadly.
/The Rules is a global network of activists, organizers, designers, coders, researchers, writers and others dedicated to changing the rules that create inequality, climate change, and poverty around the world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 15% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
298 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 298 of the 444 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
- Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗
- Who funds MULTIDISCIPLINARY ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHEDELIC STUDIES INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDERS PLEDGE INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds ICHOR RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE EASTERN PANHANDLE INC ↗
- Who funds National Veterans Homeless Support Inc ↗
- Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC ↗
- Who funds SPRITELY NETWORKED COMMUNITIES INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds Veterans For Child Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL CHARITY EVALUATORS ↗
- Who funds PLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds LIL BUBS ANIMAL WELFARE ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS ↗
- Who funds Streetlife Ministries ↗
- Who funds LIVEBETTER CORP ↗
- Who funds UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALIGNMENT RESEARCH CENTER ↗
- Who funds HUMAN APPEAL ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNTAIN FOR THE NATURAL ORDER OF OUR EXISTENCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Effective Ventures Foundation USA Inc · Founders Pledge Inc · Good Ventures Foundation · Amplify Her Charitable Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Double Up Drive Inc · Rethink Charity · Humane America Animal Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Daffy Charitable Fund · Manifold for Charity Inc · ISRB Fund Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Every Org funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Project Citizenship Inc — 10% of income from government
- Shelburne Farms — 3% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Every Org?
Find your warmest path to Every Org through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.