· Private foundation
Crocker Catalyst Foundation Fka the Oneiric Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 49% of CROCKER CATALYST FOUNDATION FKA THE ONEIRIC FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $26k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $277k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $1.0M
- $250k+6 grants · $3.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $1,625,000 |
| U OF U - COLLEGE OF SCIENCE | $1,002,000 |
| UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE | $540,000 |
| UTAH PERMACULTURE INITIATIVE | $280,000 |
| GARY AND JEANETTE HERBERT FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| SCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP - AFGHANISTAN INC | $250,000 |
| NORTHEAST OHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $216,545 |
| SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY | $150,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $125,000 |
| AMERICAN HERITAGE SCHOOLS INC | $125,000 |
| SOUTHERN VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY | $100,000 |
| BYU - MARRIOTT SCHOOL OF BUSINESS | $100,000 |
| ORPHANAGE SUPPORT SERVICES ORGANIZATION | $63,000 |
| UTAH DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COUNCIL | $60,000 |
| SUSTAINABLE COASTLINES HAWAII | $60,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
32 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $265k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PUPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $3.5M · revenue +112%
- NONORTHEAST OHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION3× · 2022–2024 · $718k · revenue +32%
- SOSCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP-AFGHANISTAN INC2× · 2023–2024 · $500k · revenue +593%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF UTAH (CROCKER SCIENCE CENTER)one grant, 2021 · $975k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF UTAH (CROCKER SCIENCE SCHOLARSHIPS)one grant, 2021 · $262k
- SOSCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP AFGANISTANone grant, 2021 · $250k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Educate and train midwives to provide safe, professional, affordable and personal maternity and general health care.
To advance sustainable health care solutions for underserved utahns through better access, education, and public policy.
We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.
Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…
To help people clear their criminal records and access opportunities. we will do this by: 1) spreading the word about utah's clean slate law to individuals with records, so they are aware of the law and its positive impact on their lives;…
Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.
To improve quality of life through comprehensive, self-empowered, culturally-sensitive healthcare and amazing customer service.
Utah's promise (up) is committed to 100% of kids and families thriving. we unify leaders, partners, communities and systems to achieve that promise.
Making lives better in southwest utah by providing accessible, quality health care, regardless of financial, language, or cultural barriers.
Increase suicide awareness and prevention
Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…
Summit land conservancy works with utah communities to conserve land and water for the benefit of the people and nature.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Summit County Clubhouse and the most unlike its peers is Odyssey Dance Theatre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST OHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP-AFGHANISTAN INC ↗
- Who funds GARY & JEANETTE HERBERT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
- Who funds American Heritage Schools Inc ↗
- Who funds MULLY CHILDRENS FAMILY USA INC ↗
- Who funds UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA ↗
- Who funds KUKULU KUMUHANA O ANAHOLA ↗
- Who funds ORPHANAGE SUPPORT SERVICES ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
- Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds SUSTAINABLE COASTLINES HAWAI'I ↗
- Who funds UTAH DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ADVISORY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Meeting House ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MOBILE SURGERY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds IRIS GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds CAPITOL HILL ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds KISMET ROCK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GLEN CANYON INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Encircle Family and Youth Resource Center ↗
- Who funds THE INN BETWEEN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Ihc Health Services Inc · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc · Utah Medical Association Foundation · Beesley Family Foundation · Petersen Bruce & Cecilia Fdn-Main · Clark and Christine Ivory Foundation · The Huntsman Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Crocker Catalyst Foundation Fka the Oneiric Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Crocker Catalyst Foundation Fka the Oneiric Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Crocker Catalyst Foundation Fka the Oneiric Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.