Skip to content

Delaware · Private foundation

The Ajay Silvia Connor Natalia Anjali Gupta Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$92k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
4
Grants FY2025
4
Organizations funded FY2024
75%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

82% of The Ajay Silvia Connor Natalia Anjali Gupta Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’20
4
’21
4
’22
2
’23
4
’24
3
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$75,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 4
FY2020 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
3
Total assets, FY2025
$880k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 75% of the organizations The Ajay Silvia Connor Natalia Anjali Gupta Family Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 87% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving3$17k100%
FY20244$39k75%
FY20232$11k50%
FY20224$31k100%
FY20214$10k100%
FY20202$276kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$252kPhilanthropy$125kHuman Services$50kEducation$29kHealth$23kInternational$19kYouth Development$10kRecreation & Sports$1k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OH
PA
RI
CA
UT
DE
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Our Rescue$250,00011%
Pacific Ridge School$26,00010%
Eminas Hand Foundation Inc$25,0001n/a
Helpusadoptorg Inc$20,00021%
Just Like My Child Foundation$15,00023%
Trinas Kids Foundation$10,0001n/a
Curebound$10,00010%
Baptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc$6,58010%
Supplies for Success Inc$5,0001n/a
Chopra Foundation$5,00010%
Show all 17 grantees
All grantees of The Ajay Silvia Connor Natalia Anjali Gupta Family Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Our Rescue$250,00011%
Pacific Ridge School$26,00010%
Eminas Hand Foundation Inc$25,0001n/a
Helpusadoptorg Inc$20,00021%
Just Like My Child Foundation$15,00023%
Trinas Kids Foundation$10,0001n/a
Curebound$10,00010%
Baptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc$6,58010%
Supplies for Success Inc$5,0001n/a
Chopra Foundation$5,00010%
Torrey Pines High School Foundation Inc$2,50010%
Homestay Teachers Volunteer Organization Inc$1,97210%
Villa Musica$1,50010%
Embrace Global$1,00011%
Arogya Inc Dba Arogya World$1,00010%
The Andrew McDonough B Foundation$1,00010%
Challenged Athletes Inc$1,00010%

What it could do for these grantees

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Ajay Silvia Connor Natalia Anjali Gupta Family Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOur Rescue: $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPacific Ridge School: $26,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHelpusadoptorg Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetJust Like My Child Foundation: $15,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCurebound: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBaptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc: $6,580 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChopra Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTorrey Pines High School Foundation Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHomestay Teachers Volunteer Organization Inc: $1,972 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVilla Musica: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEmbrace Global: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetArogya Inc Dba Arogya World: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Andrew McDonough B Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChallenged Athletes Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 14.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of San DiegoCA15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Ajay Silvia Connor Natalia Anjali Gupta Family Foundation with peer funders

About The Ajay Silvia Connor Natalia Anjali Gupta Family Foundation

How much does The Ajay Silvia Connor Natalia Anjali Gupta Family Foundation give?
The Ajay Silvia Connor Natalia Anjali Gupta Family Foundation reported 4 grants totaling $91,500 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 4 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.
What does The Ajay Silvia Connor Natalia Anjali Gupta Family Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (50%), Philanthropy (25%), Human Services (10%).
Who are The Ajay Silvia Connor Natalia Anjali Gupta Family Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: Our Rescue ($250k), Pacific Ridge School ($26k), Eminas Hand Foundation Inc ($25k).
Does The Ajay Silvia Connor Natalia Anjali Gupta Family Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 75% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Ajay Silvia Connor Natalia Anjali Gupta Family Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Ajay Silvia Connor Natalia Anjali Gupta Family Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego, The Pfizer Foundation Inc, Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc.
Where is The Ajay Silvia Connor Natalia Anjali Gupta Family Foundation based?
The Ajay Silvia Connor Natalia Anjali Gupta Family Foundation is based in DE.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ajay Silvia Connor Natalia Anjali Gupta Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph