Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Anne Wojcicki Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22M
Granted FY2024still arriving
51
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$4.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Philanthropy$67MEducation$32MScience & Tech$24MPublic Benefit$15MInternational$12MYouth Development$7.8MHealth$5.8MFood & Nutrition$3.0MOther$0
02FY2024 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $254k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+20 grants · $20M
$100,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$593M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST$4,032,247
BREAKTHROUGH PRIZE IN LIFE SCIENCES FOUNDATION$2,750,000
FOUNDATION FOR THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH$2,019,750
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$2,000,000
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY$1,841,922
THE NUEVA SCHOOL$1,000,000
ASHOKA$1,000,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION$714,286
CODE2040$600,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$573,718
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION$500,000
TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY$500,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA$500,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$400,000
THINK OF US$333,333
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $3.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THINK OF US: $333k → 14%WISH OF A LIFETIME: $50k → 12%THINK OF US: $333k → 14%WISH OF A LIFETIME: $25k → 12%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%WISH OF A LIFETIME: $25k → 12%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT: $200k → 17%AYUDANDO LATINOS A SONAR: $50k → 7%AYUDANDO LATINOS A SONAR: $50k → 7%BEYOND FISTULA: $25k → 8%BEYOND FISTULA: $25k → 8%BEYOND FISTULA: $25k → 8%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $500k → 10%BEYOND FISTULA: $25k → 8%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $500k → 10%BEYOND FISTULA: $25k → 8%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $500k → 10%BEYOND FISTULA: $25k → 8%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $250k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $50k → 10%WOMENSV: $10k → 8%WOMENSV: $10k → 8%SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA LITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $50k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA LITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $50k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$97M · 63 repeat orgs$62M to everyone else

63 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

63
55

Total granted

$97M
$59M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+13%

Still filing today

97%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • A
    ASHOKA
    7× · 2018–2024 · $7.0M · revenue +3%
  • NS
    NUEVA SCHOOL
    7× · 2018–2024 · $6.4M · revenue +17%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA
    7× · 2018–2024 · $5.1M · revenue +180%

Funded once

  • SC
    SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND - ANNE WOJCICKI FAMILY DONOR ADVISED FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $18M
  • SC
    SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND - THE ANNE WOJCICKI FAMILY DONOR ADVISED FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $17M
  • NP
    NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST - WOJIN FAMILY DONOR ADVISED FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $16M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
3
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
6
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
7
AI4ALL

Ai4all's mission is to ensure that the next generation of ai leaders reflects humanity. ai4all is transforming the pipeline of ai practitioners who will shape ai for the benefit of humanity.

Youth Development
8
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
9
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
10
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
11
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Think of Us and the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough Prize in Life Sciences Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity College Foundatio…Pregnancy Support ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyLocal History MuseumsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Jewish Community Organizati…Cancer Support ServicesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Immigrant Worker SupportDomestic Violence ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Youth Mentoring ProgramsChristian Missionary Organi…Community Arts CentersSchool District FoundationsYouth Development CentersEnvironmental Conservation …Community FoundationsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Independent K-12 SchoolsFood Banks and Pantries
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%26%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%35%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr16%23%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/119
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,446

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

116 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 116 of the 133 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
114/116
Grantees still filing
81/116
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND - ANNE WOJCICKI FAMILY DONOR ADVISED FUND — $17,780,976 · OtherSCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND - ANNE WOJCICKI FAMILY DONOR AD…SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND - THE ANNE WOJCICKI FAMILY DONOR ADVISED FUND — $16,608,728 · OtherSCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND - THE ANNE WOJCICKI FAMILY DONO…NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST - WOJIN FAMILY DONOR ADVISED FUND — $16,000,123 · OtherNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST - WOJIN FAMILY DONOR ADVI…YALE UNIVERSITY — $5,500,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA — $5,075,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA+68 more — $25,960,953 · Other+68 moreBREAKTHROUGH PRIZE IN LIFE SCIENCES FOUNDATION — $15,352,938 · PhilanthropyBREAKTHROUGH PRIZE …NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $10,532,247 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHRO…TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY — $3,600,000 · PhilanthropyTIPPING POINT COMMU…+5 more — $726,000 · PhilanthropyNUEVA SCHOOL — $6,425,000 · EducationNUEVA SCHOOLTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $4,000,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUS…Vanderbilt University — $3,681,437 · EducationVanderbilt Univer…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION — $3,428,572 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CAL…Civic Nation — $2,000,000 · EducationCivic NationTHE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE INC — $1,950,000 · EducationTHE ONE LOVE FOUN…PROJECT TF — $1,800,000 · EducationPROJECT TFCOLLEGE TRACK — $1,295,000 · Education+18 more — $2,916,500 · Education+18 moreTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION — $5,000,000 · Arts & CultureTHE EXPLORATORIUM — $2,500,000 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $1,200,000 · Arts & CultureCURIODYSSEY — $1,000,000 · Arts & Culture+10 more — $897,500 · Arts & CultureASHOKA — $7,000,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $1,300,000 · International+2 more — $375,000 · InternationalTONY BLAIR AFRICA GOVERNANCE INITIATIVE -US D/B/A TONY BLAIR FOUNDATION — $7,750,000 · AnimalsSAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $675,000 · Animals+2 more — $215,000 · AnimalsNEW VENTURE FUND — $5,333,333 · EnvironmentTRUST FOR HIDDEN VILLA — $900,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP — $500,000 · Environment+1 more — $85,000 · Environment
Other$86,926,280Philanthropy$30,211,185Education$27,496,509Arts & Culture$10,597,500International$8,675,000Animals$8,640,000Environment$6,818,333

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBREAKTHROUGH PRIZE IN LIFE SCIENCES FOUNDATION — $15,352,938 over 6y, 23% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $10,532,247 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTONY BLAIR AFRICA GOVERNANCE INITIATIVE -US D/B/A TONY BLAIR FOUNDATION — $7,750,000 over 7y, 53% of budgetASHOKA — $7,000,000 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetNUEVA SCHOOL — $6,425,000 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $5,333,333 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA — $5,075,500 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION — $5,000,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $4,000,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University — $3,681,437 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY — $3,600,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION — $3,428,572 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $2,700,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTHE EXPLORATORIUM — $2,500,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetLIFEMOVES — $2,195,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY — $2,025,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFoundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc — $2,019,750 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCivic Nation — $2,000,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetTHE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE INC — $1,950,000 over 5y, 8.9% of budgetPROJECT TF — $1,800,000 over 3y, 54% of budgetLarkin Street Youth Services — $1,800,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $1,500,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $1,300,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGE TRACK — $1,295,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $1,200,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCURIODYSSEY — $1,000,000 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetTRUST FOR HIDDEN VILLA — $900,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetFor Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) — $750,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCollege is Real Inc — $700,000 over 3y, 38% of budgetROOM TO READ — $700,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY SKATING INC — $680,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetREBOOT INC — $675,000 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $675,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetTHINK OF US — $666,666 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetTHE FAMILY GIVING TREE — $600,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $525,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetABODE SERVICES — $500,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWHEN WE ALL VOTE — $500,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP — $500,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetBLACK ECONOMIC ALLIANCE FOUNDATION — $350,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetCLEAN SLATE INITIATIVE INC — $333,333 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC — $300,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLOS ALTOS MOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $261,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetSAFE & SOUND — $260,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetLost Women of Science Initiative Inc — $250,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC — $250,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH PRIZE IN LIFE SCIENCES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds TONY BLAIR AFRICA GOVERNANCE INITIATIVE -US D/B/A TONY BLAIR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASHOKA ↗
  • Who funds NUEVA SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA ↗
  • Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds THE EXPLORATORIUM ↗
  • Who funds LIFEMOVES ↗
  • Who funds COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc ↗
  • Who funds Civic Nation ↗
  • Who funds THE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT TF ↗
  • Who funds Larkin Street Youth Services ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE TRACK ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds CURIODYSSEY ↗
  • Who funds TRUST FOR HIDDEN VILLA ↗
  • Who funds For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) ↗
  • Who funds College is Real Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROOM TO READ ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SKATING INC ↗
  • Who funds REBOOT INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THINK OF US ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…The David and Lucile …Tides FoundationThe San Francisco Fou…Los Altos Mountain Vi…The Sobrato Family Fo…Gordon E and Betty I …The William & Flora H…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Sand Hill FoundationThe Palo Alto Communi…Kaiser Foundation Hos…
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA41.3× affinity37 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Tides Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Sand Hill Foundation · The Palo Alto Community Fund · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Anne Wojcicki Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Anne Wojcicki Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Anne Wojcicki Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 133 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines