Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Stanford Health Care

$110M
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$104M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

96% of Stanford Health Care’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 23 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

12
’17
17
’18
16
’19
16
’20
12
’21
28
’22
20
’23
23
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$462MEducation$146MHousing & Shelter$4.8MHuman Services$3.4MFood & Nutrition$2.5MEmployment$672kPhilanthropy$100kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+9 grants · $107M
$175,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$12.1B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES STANFORD UNIVERSITY$104,416,806
PENINSULA HEALTHCARE CONNECTION INC$550,644
DESTINATION HOME$500,000
LIFEMOVES$400,000
SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY$378,000
THE HEALTH TRUST$350,000
SAMARITAN HOUSE$293,037
PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE$252,380
SOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC$250,000
WE HOPE$231,750
DOWNTOWN STREETS INC$214,000
AVENIDAS$195,000
FUTURO HEALTH$175,000
MOMENTUM FOR HEALTH$150,000
AMBULATORY SURGERY ACCESS COALITION$126,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WATER AND EDUCATION INTERNATIONAL INC: $18k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100k → 14%AVENIDAS: $325k → 8%AVENIDAS: $323k → 8%AVENIDAS: $310k → 8%SENIOR COASTSIDERS INC: $60k → 7%AVENIDAS: $195k → 8%STARVISTA: $13k → 7%AVENIDAS: $195k → 8%SENIOR COASTSIDERS INC: $35k → 7%STARVISTA: $12k → 7%AVENIDAS: $175k → 8%SENIOR COASTSIDERS INC: $30k → 7%AVENIDAS: $100k → 8%AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $10k → 8%AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $8k → 8%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $8k → 8%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSN SIL VALLEY: $10k → 8%COMMUNITY SVCS AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$19M · 31 repeat orgs$862k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
14

Total granted

$19M
$339k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+23%

Still filing today

90%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $523k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEmploymentFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +45%
  • SC
    South County Community Health Center Inc dba Ravenswood Family Health Center
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +115%
  • PH
    PENINSULA HEALTHCARE CONNECTION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +362%

Funded once

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +23%
  • PD
    PUENTE DE LA COSTA SURgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $80k · revenue +56%
  • SV
    Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
2
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
3
Equity Health

Our mission is to ensure health care access to quality comprehensive health care services for persons who are medically needy or medically under-served and have traditionally experienced difficulty in getting care from traditional sources.

—
4
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

—
5
Tiburcio Vasquez Health Center Inc

Provide comprehensive community health services to southern Alameda County.

Health
6
Asian and Pacific Islander Wellness Center Inc

Our core belief at San Francisco Community Health Center is that everyone deserves to be healthy and needs access to the highest quality health care. Our mission is to transform lives by advancing health, wellness and equality.

Health
7
Santa Rosa Community Health Centers

The Santa Rosa Community Health Centers are dedicated to providing excellent, comprehensive primary health care, prevention, and health education for people who are uninsured and underinsured in Santa Rosa, regardless of ability to pay.

Health
8
Bay Area Community Services Housing Corp

Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.

Housing & Shelter
9
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
10
Valley Health Team Inc

Valley Health Team, Inc. was established in 1973 for the purpose of providing accessible comprehensive, quality primary health care and additional services to the people in the communities we serve in a culturally and linguistically…

Health
11
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
12
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Health Trust and the most unlike its peers is Khalil Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health Care AccessResearch & Innovation Insti…Affordable Senior HousingRegional Economic Developme…Christian Evangelical Organ…International Development A…Independent Arts PresentersEducation Equity & Access P…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%3%<5yr15%8%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr17%32%20–35yr14%22%35–55yr12%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr17%98%20–35yr14%1%35–55yr12%1%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/68
the rest of the field
11%
3,557/30,976

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
60/61
Grantees still filing
47/61
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $595,897,139 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY+1 more — $39,500 · EducationSouth County Community Health Center Inc dba Ravenswood Family Health Center — $2,158,210 · HealthPENINSULA HEALTHCARE CONNECTION INC — $2,156,932 · HealthTHE HEALTH TRUST — $1,785,000 · HealthHEALTHCARE FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN AND CENTRAL CALIFORNIA — $1,230,553 · HealthAmbulatory Surgery Access Coalition — $578,500 · HealthPublic Health Institute — $528,406 · HealthSONRISAS DENTAL HEALTH INC — $439,354 · HealthROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $416,903 · Health+11 more — $981,107 · HealthSAMARITAN HOUSE — $1,789,620 · OtherLIFEMOVES — $800,000 · OtherMAYVIEW COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $737,500 · OtherCounty of Santa Clara — $383,146 · OtherWEHOPE — $231,750 · Other+11 more — $422,250 · OtherDestination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation — $3,050,000 · Housing & Shelter+3 more — $73,800 · Housing & ShelterSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $2,461,000 · Food & NutritionAVENIDAS — $1,622,565 · Human ServicesSENIOR COASTSIDERS INC — $125,200 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $100,000 · Human Services+6 more — $87,860 · Human ServicesDowntown Streets Inc — $1,041,296 · EmploymentJOBTRAIN INC — $69,095 · Employment
Education$595,936,639Health$10,274,965Other$4,364,266Housing & Shelter$3,123,800Food & Nutrition$2,461,000Human Services$1,935,625Employment$1,110,391

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $595,897,139 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetDestination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation — $3,050,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $2,461,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSouth County Community Health Center Inc dba Ravenswood Family Health Center — $2,158,210 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetPENINSULA HEALTHCARE CONNECTION INC — $2,156,932 over 8y, 14% of budgetSAMARITAN HOUSE — $1,789,620 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetTHE HEALTH TRUST — $1,785,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetAVENIDAS — $1,622,565 over 7y, 4.8% of budgetHEALTHCARE FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN AND CENTRAL CALIFORNIA — $1,230,553 over 5y, 79% of budgetDowntown Streets Inc — $1,041,296 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetLIFEMOVES — $800,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMAYVIEW COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $737,500 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetAmbulatory Surgery Access Coalition — $578,500 over 7y, 5.1% of budgetPublic Health Institute — $528,406 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSONRISAS DENTAL HEALTH INC — $439,354 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $416,903 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetMOMENTUM FOR HEALTH — $310,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWEHOPE — $231,750 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetFUTURO HEALTH — $175,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ASIAN AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC — $171,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSENIOR COASTSIDERS INC — $125,200 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetCAL VOICES — $104,652 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI SANTA CLARA COUNTY — $93,050 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetPUENTE DE LA COSTA SUR — $80,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetJOBTRAIN INC — $69,095 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetVALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF) — $50,405 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRebuilding Together Peninsula — $48,800 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCommunity Health Partnership Inc — $47,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetThe Peninsula College Fund — $39,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetROTACARE BAY AREA INC — $36,250 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetLATINAS CONTRA CANCER — $30,000 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetSilicon Valley Bicycle Coalition — $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetStarVista — $24,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKARA — $24,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATER AND EDUCATION INTERNATIONAL INC — $18,360 over 1y, 21% of budgetAFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY — $17,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGARDNER FAMILY HEALTH NETWORK INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVITUITY CARES FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetWEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPALO ALTO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE LTD — $12,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetASIAN HEALTH SERVICES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHuman Investment Project Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYWCA GOLDEN GATE SILICON VALLEY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sobrato Family Fo…Kaiser Foundation Hos…The David and Lucile …Silicon Valley Commun…Sunlight GivingSecond Harvest of Sil…Sutter Bay HospitalsDestination Home SV c…Gordon E and Betty I …San Jose Mercury News…Atkinson FoundationLos Altos Mountain Vi…
The Sobrato Family FoundationCA51.6× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sobrato Family Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Sunlight Giving · Second Harvest of Silicon Valley · Sutter Bay Hospitals · Destination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Atkinson Foundation · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stanford Health Care funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    31report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines