Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Malott Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
42
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Environment$11MEducation$6.8MPhilanthropy$5.7MPublic Safety & Disaster$4.1MArts & Culture$1.9MFood & Nutrition$1.6MScience & Tech$1.1MAnimals$1.0MOther$0
02FY2024 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $475k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $933k
  • $250k+8 grants · $5.7M
$30,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$93M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN RED CROSS$1,455,000
CHICAGO BOTANICAL GARDEN$1,300,000
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION$860,000
CHICAGO PUBLIC EDUCATIONAL FUND$500,000
KIZZIAH FAMILY DONOR ADVISED FUND$400,000
POHLE FAMILY FOUNDATION CHARITABLE GIVING FUND$400,000
MALOTT FAMILY DONOR ADVISED FUND CHARITABLE GIVING ACCT$400,000
FEEDING AMERICA$370,000
TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY$200,000
LIFEMOVES$150,000
TEACH FOR AMERICA$150,000
CHARLES ARMSTRONG SCHOOL$125,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$100,000
KENILWORTH UNION CHURCH$57,500
GOOD SHEPHERD FOOD BANK OF MAINE$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOOVER INSTITUTION: $200k → 8%TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $200k → 10%SCRIPPS COLLEGE: $400k → 14%NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $1.2M → 14%COLORADO COLLEGE: $200k → 9%LINCOLN PARK ZOO: $400k → 14%HOOVER INSTITUTION: $200k → 8%NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $860k → 14%COLORADO COLLEGE: $200k → 9%COLORADO COLLEGE: $200k → 9%CHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER: $200k → 9%LIFEMOVES: $350k → 7%LIFEMOVES: $275k → 7%AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $647k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1.5M → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1.5M → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $550k → 14%CHICAGO BOTANICAL GARDEN: $1.5M → 14%CHICAGO BOTANICAL GARDEN: $1.3M → 14%CHICAGO BOTANICAL GARDEN: $1.3M → 14%CHICAGO BOTANICAL GARDEN: $1.3M → 14%CHICAGO BOTANICAL GARDEN: $1.3M → 14%CHICAGO BOTANICAL GARDEN: $1.3M → 14%CHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER: $225k → 14%AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $500k → 14%CHICAGO PUBLIC EDUCATIONAL FUND: $500k → 14%CHICAGO PUBLIC EDUCATIONAL FUND: $400k → 14%CHICAGO PUBLIC EDUCATIONAL FUND: $300k → 14%CHICAGO PUBLIC EDUCATIONAL FUND: $300k → 14%CHICAGO PUBLIC EDUCATIONAL FUND: $300k → 14%CHICAGO PUBLIC EDUCATIONAL FUND: $300k → 14%CHICAGO PUBLIC EDUCATIONAL FUND: $300k → 14%CHICAGO PUBLIC EDUCATIONAL FUND: $300k → 14%MALOTT FAMILY FUND CHARITABLE GIVING ACCOUNT: $495k → 14%FEEDING AMERICA: $440k → 14%KIZZIAH FAMILY DONOR ADVISED FUND: $400k → 14%DEANE AND JILL MALOTT FAMILY FUND: $400k → 14%KIZZIAH FAMILY FUND: $400k → 14%MALOTT FAMILY DONOR ADVISED FUND CHARITABLE GIVING ACCT: $400k → 14%KIZZIAH FAMILY FUND: $400k → 14%POHLE FAMILY FOUNDATION CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $400k → 14%POHLE FAMILY FOUNDATION CHARITABLE GIVING: $400k → 14%POHLE FAMILY FOUNDATION CHARITABLE GIVING: $380k → 14%FEEDING AMERICA: $375k → 14%FEEDING AMERICA: $370k → 14%DEANE AND JILL MALOTT FAMILY FUND: $300k → 14%POHLE FAMILY FUND: $300k → 14%KIZZIAH FAMILY FUND: $300k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
KS
DC
HI
LA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$33M · 63 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

63 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

63
31

Total granted

$33M
$833k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+49%

Still filing today

59%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentHealthFood & NutritionAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $8.2M · revenue +37%
  • NP
    NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +244%
  • Feeding America
    4× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • MF
    MALOTT FAMILY FUND CHARITABLE GIVING ACCOUNT
    one grant, 2023 · $495k
  • SF
    SPRINGBOARD FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS
    one grant, 2022 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
8
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
9
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
10
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
11
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
12
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Aspen Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Food Banks and PantriesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Policy Research and AdvocacySchool District FoundationsCommunity FoundationsCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%2%<5yr13%2%5–10yr18%5%10–20yr15%23%20–35yr14%29%35–55yr22%40%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%1%10–20yr15%23%20–35yr14%19%35–55yr22%57%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/64
the rest of the field
12%
8,891/72,295

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
60/60
Grantees still filing
49/60
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN RED CROSS — $3,935,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $2,180,000 · OtherNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATIONKIZZIAH FAMILY FUND — $1,379,187 · OtherKIZZIAH FAMILY FUNDDEANE AND JILL MALOTT FAMILY FUND — $979,653 · OtherDEANE AND JILL MALOTT FAMILY FUNDPOHLE FAMILY FOUNDATION CHARITABLE GIVING — $880,000 · OtherLIFEMOVES — $775,000 · OtherCHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER — $625,000 · Other+61 more — $6,287,648 · Other+61 moreCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY — $8,200,000 · EnvironmentCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCI…ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES — $305,000 · Environment+3 more — $20,000 · EnvironmentCHICAGO PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND — $2,700,000 · EducationCHICAGO PUBLIC EDU…THE COLORADO COLLEGE — $1,140,000 · EducationTHE COLORADO COLLE…Teach for America Inc — $826,660 · EducationTeach for America …Scripps College — $590,000 · EducationScripps CollegeTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $560,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUST…+11 more — $287,500 · EducationKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry — $1,100,000 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER — $565,000 · Arts & CultureFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $152,500 · Arts & CultureRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $80,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $20,000 · Arts & CultureFeeding America — $1,260,000 · Food & NutritionTHE FOOD BANK OF LOWER FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC — $105,000 · Food & NutritionGood Shepherd Food Bank — $100,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 more — $50,500 · Food & NutritionLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $1,000,000 · Animals+1 more — $2,000 · AnimalsAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH — $666,902 · Social ScienceTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $40,000 · Social Science
Other$17,041,488Environment$8,525,000Education$6,104,160Arts & Culture$1,917,500Food & Nutrition$1,515,500Animals$1,002,000Social Science$706,902

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY — $8,200,000 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetCHICAGO PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND — $2,700,000 over 8y, 14% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $2,180,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetFeeding America — $1,260,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE — $1,140,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry — $1,100,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $1,000,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $826,660 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLIFEMOVES — $775,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH — $666,902 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetScripps College — $590,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER — $565,000 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $560,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES — $305,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY — $200,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Chicago Community Trust — $175,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $152,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNEW CANAAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $145,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetTHE CHARLES ARMSTRONG SCHOOL — $125,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Foundation for Education — $120,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF LOWER FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC — $105,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetGood Shepherd Food Bank — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACADEMY FOR URBAN SCHOOL LEADERSHIP — $100,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGOLDEN APPLE FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING — $80,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $80,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetINSPIRICA INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetILLINOIS POLICY INSTITUTE — $70,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHIGH JUMP — $60,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetSTART EARLY — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association — $48,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW CANAAN COMMUNITY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC — $40,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPIVOT MINISTRIES INC — $40,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $26,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNOURISHING HOPE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO — $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra — $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA — $13,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNUEVA SCHOOL — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOODIC INSTITUTE AT ACADIA NATIONAL PARK — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOSEMITE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOSHUA TREE NATIONAL PARK ASSOCIATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds THE COLORADO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Kenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIFEMOVES ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds Scripps College ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds The Chicago Community Trust ↗
  • Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds NEW CANAAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHARLES ARMSTRONG SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Foundation for Education ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD BANK OF LOWER FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Ayco Charitable F…The Chicago Community…Morgan Stanley Global…Lloyd a Fry FoundationNational Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Greater HorizonsSilicon Valley Commun…Vanguard Charitable E…Baird Foundation IncThe Bank of America C…
Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY19.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Greater Horizons · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Baird Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Malott Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Inspirica Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 104 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines