· Community foundation
The Palo Alto Community Fund
THE PALO ALTO COMMUNITY FUND focuses on the unique needs of our community and channels charitable giving of local donors to effective organizations that improve the quality of life for everyone in palo alto, east palo alto and menlo park.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 69 grants below total $1,785,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,825,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $40,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k66 grants · $1.5M
- $50k–250k3 grants · $300k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EL CONCILIO OF SAN MATEO COUN | $100,000 |
| COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES EPA | $100,000 |
| NUESTRA CASA DE EAST PALO ALT | $100,000 |
| EPACENTER | $40,000 |
| DREAMCATCHERS | $40,000 |
| UPWARD SCHOLARS | $40,000 |
| ELIZABETH F GAMBLE GARDEN | $40,000 |
| LIFEMOVES | $40,000 |
| EAST PALO ALTO SENIOR CENTER | $40,000 |
| EAST PALO ALTO ACADEMY FDN | $40,000 |
| FRESH APPROACH | $40,000 |
| ADAS CAFE | $40,000 |
| CHILDRENS HEALTH COUNCIL | $40,000 |
| EAST PALO ALTO TENNIS & TUTOR | $40,000 |
| FRIENDS OF PALO ALTO JR M&Z | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
118 repeat relationships — 53 still active in FY2025, 65 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $365k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LLIFEMOVES6× · 2017–2025 · $510k · revenue +186%
- RERAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2025 · $285k · revenue +212%
- DCDream Catchers Inc7× · 2017–2025 · $195k · revenue +152%
Funded once
- MDMy Digital TAT2 Incone grant, 2024 · $115k · revenue -41%
- SCSOUTH COUNTY COMM HEALTH CENone grant, 2024 · $40k
- SHSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEYgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $35k · revenue +45%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
PPS-SF's mission is to promote the fundamental value of public education and pursue the success of every public school by sharing knowledge, bridging communities, and informing policy.
The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…
For more than 70 years, East Bay Agency for Children continues to improve the well-being of children, youth and families by reducing the impact of trauma and social inequalities.
Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.
Who we are - silicon valley education foundation (svef) focuses on raising student performance in the critical areas of math and science across all 33 santa clara county school districts, and also adjoining san mateo and alameda counties.…
San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…
By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…
Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Institute for Applied Tinkering IAT develops, practices and shares educational methods that challenge and support all children to engage deeply in their learning via real interests and real tools.
Foodwise grows thriving communities through the power and joy of local food. We envision a world that nourishes all people, local economies, and the living earth.
Support and inspire children's natural curiosity and independence through free play during their out-of-school time.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Live in Peace and the most unlike its peers is Parca House 4 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
162 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 162 of the 176 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LIFEMOVES ↗
- Who funds Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto Inc ↗
- Who funds RAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Nuestra Casa de East Palo Alto ↗
- Who funds LIVE IN PEACE ↗
- Who funds Dream Catchers Inc ↗
- Who funds JOBTRAIN INC ↗
- Who funds WEHOPE ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds LOAVES & FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds Upward Scholars ↗
- Who funds South County Community Health Center Inc dba Ravenswood Family Health Center ↗
- Who funds PALO ALTO COMMUNITY CHILD CARE ↗
- Who funds Climate Resilient Communities ↗
- Who funds PENINSULA HEALTHCARE CONNECTION INC ↗
- Who funds ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds Ada's Cafe ↗
- Who funds KARA ↗
- Who funds CORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds COUNSELING AND SUPPORT SERVICES FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds ABILITYPATH ↗
- Who funds EAST PALO ALTO TENNIS & TUTORING ↗
- Who funds PALO ALTO UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds EAST PALO ALTO ACADEMY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds My Digital TAT2 Inc ↗
- Who funds EAST PALO ALTO KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EPACENTER ↗
- Who funds AVENIDAS ↗
- Who funds RAVENSWOOD CLASSROOM PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds KAFENIA PEACE COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds EL CONCILIO OF SAN MATEO COUNTY ↗
- Who funds PALO ALTO ART CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ADOLESCENT COUNSELING SERVICES ↗
- Who funds FRESH LIFELINES FOR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR A COLLEGE EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County ↗
- Who funds EAST PALO ALTO SENIOR CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Atkinson Foundation · Philanthropic Ventures Foundation · Embarcadero Media Foundation · Sand Hill Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · Bothin Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Palo Alto Community Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.