Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Change A Life Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2023.

Human Services$1.1MHealth$655kHousing & Shelter$603kEducation$336kYouth Development$200kCrime & Legal$131kArts & Culture$90kFood & Nutrition$86kOther$0
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$260k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$15,000
RAD CAMP$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $749k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDEN'S SERVICE: $54k → 10%MONTEBELLO-COMMERCE YMCA: $10k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $9k → 11%NEW BEGINNINGS COUNSELING CENTER: $72k → 14%DAVID & MARGARET HOME: $70k → 14%LAURA'S HOUSE: $10k → 10%CASA TERESA: $10k → 10%HUMAN OPTIONS: $25k → 10%ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION: $75k → 10%PARA LOS NINOS: $25k → 14%COMMUNITY SENIOR SERVICES: $36k → 14%PROGRAM FOR TORTURE VICTIMS: $176k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELE: $127k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
WA
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
MO
VA
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

8%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$292k · 3 repeat orgs$3.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +182% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
108

Total granted

$292k
$3.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+182%
+32%

Still filing today

67%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’21’22’23
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER LOS ANGELES
    2× · 2018–2022 · $153k · revenue +182%
  • CO
    CITY OF HOPE
    2× · 2018–2022 · $112k
  • FA
    FRIENDSHIP ADULT DAY CARE CENTER INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $27k · revenue +117%

Funded once

  • PF
    Program for Torture Victims
    one grant, 2018 · $176k · revenue +22%
  • PF
    PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $160k · revenue +58%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELESgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $127k · revenue +78%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
3
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
4
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
5
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
6
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
7
Mary's Shelter

Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
Pediatric and Family Medical Center Dba Eisner Health

Eisner health is a quality-focused, federally qualified nonprofit community health center dedicated to improving the physical, social, and emotional well-being of people in the communities we serve, regardless of income.

Health
10
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
11
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
12
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Families Forward and the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Developm…Developmental Disabilities …University and School Found…Union Health & Welfare PlansMedical Research FundingSenior Residential HousingPerforming Arts Organizatio…Jewish Philanthropic Organi…Homeless Services & HousingCommunity Health CentersChild & Family Mental Healt…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr17%26%20–35yr11%35%35–55yr13%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr17%22%20–35yr11%40%35–55yr13%23%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/71
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,907

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
68/69
Grantees still filing
61/69
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION — $160,081 · OtherPROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $120,136 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITY OF HOPE — $112,069 · OtherCITY OF HOPEHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - OC — $100,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - OCFive Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County — $95,000 · Other+78 more — $1,242,143 · Other+78 moreProgram for Torture Victims — $175,960 · Human ServicesProgram for Torture Vict…JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES — $127,069 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF…Illumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation — $75,000 · Human ServicesIllumination Health Home…NBCC — $72,353 · Human ServicesNBCCDavid and Margaret Home Inc — $69,776 · Human ServicesDavid and Margaret Home …JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES — $54,084 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDR…FULFILLMENT FUND — $50,000 · Human ServicesFULFILLMENT FUNDAGINGNEXT INC — $36,213 · Human ServicesFRIENDSHIP ADULT DAY CARE CENTER INC — $27,000 · Human Services+6 more — $88,913 · Human Services+6 moreHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER LOS ANGELES — $153,100 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR …Orange County Rescue Mission Inc — $86,154 · Housing & ShelterOrange Count…PEOPLE'S SELF HELP HOUSING CORP — $47,127 · Housing & ShelterPEOPLE'S SEL…LIFE SKILLS TRAINING & EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS INC — $32,887 · Housing & ShelterLIFE SKILLS …HABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY — $31,200 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR …CASA YOUTH SHELTER — $20,000 · Housing & Shelter+2 more — $11,542 · Housing & ShelterVENICE FAMILY CLINIC — $75,000 · HealthVIP COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $50,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION — $49,531 · HealthALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION — $49,338 · HealthSANSUM CLINIC — $16,741 · HealthDeaf Community Services of San Diego Inc — $13,191 · Health+1 more — $5,500 · HealthPABLOVE FOUNDATION INC — $70,000 · PhilanthropyAva's Heart — $59,700 · PhilanthropyBurn Institute — $27,267 · PhilanthropyJUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH — $50,137 · Youth DevelopmentFILM2FUTURE — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITY SENIORSERV INC — $76,964 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,829,429Human Services$776,368Housing & Shelter$382,010Health$259,301Philanthropy$156,967Youth Development$100,137Food & Nutrition$76,964

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION — $160,081 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER LOS ANGELES — $153,100 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES — $127,069 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFive Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County — $95,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOrange County Rescue Mission Inc — $86,154 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY SENIORSERV INC — $76,964 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetIllumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation — $75,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPABLOVE FOUNDATION INC — $70,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetDavid and Margaret Home Inc — $69,776 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAva's Heart — $59,700 over 1y, 23% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES — $54,084 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH — $50,137 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFILM2FUTURE — $50,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetTHE UNDERGROUND MUSEUM INC — $50,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetVIP COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFULFILLMENT FUND — $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION — $49,531 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION — $49,338 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK — $39,035 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetAGINGNEXT INC — $36,213 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetLIFE SKILLS TRAINING & EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS INC — $32,887 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY — $31,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBurn Institute — $27,267 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetFRIENDSHIP ADULT DAY CARE CENTER INC — $27,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetFAMILIES FORWARD — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHuman Options Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPARA LOS NINOS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPenny Lane Centers — $20,185 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA YOUTH SHELTER — $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBEYOND BLINDNESS — $17,782 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSANSUM CLINIC — $16,741 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProject Hope Alliance — $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDeaf Community Services of San Diego Inc — $13,191 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetProject Access Inc — $11,649 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRAD CAMP INC — $10,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetSHELTER PROVIDERS OF ORANGE COUNTY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOCEANA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAURA'S HOUSE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCASA TERESA INC — $9,600 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTH COUNTY OUTREACH — $9,459 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO — $9,313 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Communi…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Sisters of St Joseph …California Community …O L Halsell FoundationThe Devto Support Fou…Edwards Lifesciences …Weingart FoundationOneocFarmers & Merchants B…Mufg Union Bank Found…Sempra Foundation
Orange County Community FoundationCA39.9× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · California Community Foundation · O L Halsell Foundation · The Devto Support Foundation · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Oneoc · Farmers & Merchants Bank Foundation · Mufg Union Bank Foundation Ag · Sempra Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Change A Life Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Change A Life Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Change A Life Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 119 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines