· Private foundation
Philip and Daniele Barach Family Foundat
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k32 grants · $557k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $480k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JEWISH BUSINESS NETWORK | $150,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF IDC | $75,000 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GTR LA | $55,000 |
| HADASSAH THE WOMEN'S ZIONIST ORG | $50,000 |
| AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION | $50,000 |
| JEWISH NATIONAL FUND | $50,000 |
| JEWISH GRADUATE STUDENT INITIATIVE INC | $50,000 |
| JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION | $41,000 |
| UCLA FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF LOS ANGELES | $40,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES | $30,000 |
| FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC | $25,000 |
| CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES | $20,000 |
| LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $222k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
48 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $214k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF REICHMAN UNIVERSITY INC6× · 2019–2025 · $275k · revenue +0%
- JGJEWISH GRADUATE STUDENT INITIATIVE7× · 2019–2025 · $188k · revenue +87%
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES5× · 2021–2025 · $180k · revenue +113%
Funded once
- PCPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $300k · revenue -1%
- YFYud Foundation Incone grant, 2024 · $250k
- OCOAK CREST INSTITUTE OF SCIENCEgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +38%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…
Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.
The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…
To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.
The mission of lapf is to create partnerships to provide resources and programs that help the police perform at their highest level and to enhance lapd-community relations.(see schedule o)
The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…
The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…
To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Cureshank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA ↗
- Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF REICHMAN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
- Who funds Yud Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds JEWISH GRADUATE STUDENT INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
- Who funds 826LA ↗
- Who funds BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD ↗
- Who funds THE MIDNIGHT MISSION ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds THE MILKEN INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI National ↗
- Who funds WATER FOR PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds OAK CREST INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds First School Financial Aid Trust ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds Operation Second Chance Inc ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · California Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation · Resnick Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Philip and Daniele Barach Family Foundat funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.