Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lee and Luis Lainer Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1000k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

International$2.8MReligion$1.0MEducation$1.0MCrime & Legal$663kHuman Services$375kPhilanthropy$279kCivil Rights$240kHousing & Shelter$195kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $132k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $845k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$8.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BET TZEDEK$200,000
IKAR$170,000
NEW ISRAEL FUND$115,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$100,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$80,000
NEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INC$80,000
ACLU OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$50,000
HASHOMER HATZAIR INC-CAMPSHOMRIA$50,000
USA FOR UNHCR$35,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES$15,000
LA 1ST$15,000
CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
PLOUGHSHARES FUND$15,000
LIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION$12,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $65k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $15k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $15k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $15k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.6M · 22 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
6

Total granted

$4.6M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+120%

Still filing today

64%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsEnvironmentHealthSocial ScienceOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BT
    BET TZEDEK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $663k · revenue +123%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $510k · revenue +81%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $280k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • PA
    PRESSMAN ACADEMY
    one grant, 2024 · $1.0M
  • TV
    THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +120%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
4
United Israel Appeal Inc

The principal function of uia is to administer and supervise the funds allocated for philanthropic purposes related to immigration and absorption of humanitarian migrants to israel and jewish identity programs in israel and the former…

International
5
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
6
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
7
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
8
Global Communities

Global communities brings together local ingenuity and global insights to save lives and secure strong futures.

International
9
Human Rights Watch Inc

Human rights watch ("hrw") defends the rights of people worldwide. we scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. human rights watch is an independent,…

International
10
Nijc Nfp

The National Immigrant Justice Center (NIJC) is a leader in advancing immigrant rights through its unique strategy drawing on its legal services to promote legal reform through litigation, advocacy and strategic communications.

Crime & Legal
11
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
12
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hispanic Federation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr17%26%20–35yr11%48%35–55yr13%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr17%19%20–35yr11%61%35–55yr13%16%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,954

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PRESSMAN ACADEMY — $1,000,000 · OtherPRESSMAN ACADEMYIKAR — $840,000 · OtherIKARBET TZEDEK — $662,500 · OtherBET TZEDEKJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF LA — $235,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF LALA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION — $195,000 · OtherLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATIONACLU OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $150,000 · OtherTEMPLE BETH AM BUILDING FUND — $120,000 · Other+12 more — $253,500 · Other+12 moreNEW ISRAEL FUND — $837,000 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUNDNEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INC — $760,000 · InternationalNEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INCInternational Rescue Committee INC — $510,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $280,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCUnited States Association for UNHCR — $210,000 · InternationalUnited States Association for UNHCRPLOUGHSHARES FUND INC — $135,000 · International+1 more — $45,000 · InternationalJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES — $180,000 · PhilanthropyLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION — $54,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $5,000 · PhilanthropyCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS — $90,000 · Civil RightsTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER — $50,000 · Civil RightsJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES — $125,000 · Human ServicesNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $90,000 · EnvironmentPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $45,000 · Health
Other$3,456,000International$2,777,000Philanthropy$239,000Civil Rights$140,000Human Services$125,000Environment$90,000Health$45,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND — $837,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetNEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INC — $760,000 over 9y, 7.0% of budgetBET TZEDEK — $662,500 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $510,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $280,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR — $210,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION — $195,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES — $180,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPLOUGHSHARES FUND INC — $135,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES — $125,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS — $90,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION — $54,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVILLAGE HEALTH WORKS — $45,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTRICKLE UP PROGRAM INC — $22,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Supporters of Yedid Inc — $15,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetUnited for A Fair Economy Inc — $15,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND
  • Who funds NEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INC
  • Who funds BET TZEDEK
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR
  • Who funds LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES
  • Who funds PLOUGHSHARES FUND INC
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
  • Who funds LIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER
  • Who funds VILLAGE HEALTH WORKS
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
  • Who funds TRICKLE UP PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds American Supporters of Yedid Inc
  • Who funds United for A Fair Economy Inc
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO
  • Who funds HISPANIC FEDERATION INC
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY16× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lee and Luis Lainer Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lee and Luis Lainer Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lee and Luis Lainer Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph