Texas · Nonprofit
CULTIVATE MISSIONS
CULTIVATE MISSIONS (Texas) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $6,034 to it, the largest being JPMORGAN CHASE FOUNDATION ($3,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 50% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- Revenue FY2022
- $434k
- Funders on record
- 3
- Grants received
- $6k
- Net assets
- $2.6M
What Cultivate Missions does
Mission
Cultivate leadership seeks to make disciples of jesus christ and plant churches among asian young professionals throughout asia.
As stated on its FY2022 Form 990.
Program
Cultivate Missions' vision is to disciple and plant churches throughout asia. In 2022, 15 men and women were mentored through the 9-month living on a mission training. Additionally, a course on parenting with biblical principles was taught over 2 months to 14 mothers and fathers. Additionally, cultivate leadership provided two discussion groups totaling 19 people through a 36-week study on coping with difficulties and recognizing how god can bring benefit through our suffering. In august 2022, Cultivate Missions held its eighth annual church planters' retreat over 2 days, with 49 of our house church leaders for intensive training, team building and spiritual renewal. Additionally, the organization hosted an online, quarterly "leadership community" to provide further equipping, time for sharing about their ministries, and prayer together. Additionally, the organization provided one-to-one, online mentoring for the church planters to strengthen their personal spiritual growth and ministry leadership skills. In 2022, the organization provided vision and counsel for eight church plants called "grace city church." approximately 15 regular participants attended each group. These…
$468,677 spentof which $6,525 as grants100% of program spending
The program described on its FY2022 Form 990. Program spending in total: $468,677.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $3.0M to $2.6M (−14%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
107% of CULTIVATE MISSIONS’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $2k → $22.
2 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 50% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of CULTIVATE MISSIONS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
CULTIVATE MISSIONS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 50% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
50% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CULTIVATE MISSIONS.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
50% of CULTIVATE MISSIONS's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $3k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Texas, across 1 state.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $3k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
CULTIVATE MISSIONS is better cushioned than half of the 11,452 religion nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 11,452 religion nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2022
Organizations like CULTIVATE MISSIONS
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Texas
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
92% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
69%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CULTIVATE MISSIONS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds CULTIVATE MISSIONS?
- CULTIVATE MISSIONS (Texas) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $6,034 to it, the largest being JPMORGAN CHASE FOUNDATION ($3,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 50% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does CULTIVATE MISSIONS have?
- IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $6,034 in grants to CULTIVATE MISSIONS, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of CULTIVATE MISSIONS?
- JPMORGAN CHASE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $3,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like CULTIVATE MISSIONS find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Cultivate Missions →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2022 (financials across 2019–2022), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing