· Community foundation
Sozo Supporting Organization Fund
Empower organizations to help communities and individuals to grow in the depth of their knowledge of jesus christ and in their ability to co-labor with him to build his kingdom.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 14 grants below total $753,250 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $815,609 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $62,359 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $169k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $273k
- $250k+1 grant · $299k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FDN TRUST | $298,500 |
| COVENANT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CHICAGO | $213,000 |
| TRANSFORMATIONAL LISTENING CENTER | $60,000 |
| JAPANESE EVANGELICAL MISSIONARY SOCIETY | $36,000 |
| TOGETHER CHICAGO INC | $24,369 |
| SUNSHINE GOSPEL MINISTRIES | $24,000 |
| NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION | $19,081 |
| SERGE GLOBAL INC (JAPAN) | $15,100 |
| CHICAGO BIBLE SOCIETY | $15,000 |
| HOPE INTERNATIONAL | $12,500 |
| SEEJESUSNET | $12,500 |
| THE FIELD SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| CHICAGO FELLOWSHIP | $7,200 |
| LIGHTBEARERS MINISTRIES INTL INC | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against -5% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SGSUNSHINE GOSPEL MINISTRIES6× · 2020–2025 · $189k · revenue +9%
- SGSERGE GLOBAL INC6× · 2020–2025 · $167k · revenue +49%
- TCTOGETHER CHICAGO INC5× · 2020–2025 · $130k · revenue ×11
Funded once
- CICREATION INVESTMENTS FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2024 · $400k · revenue -99% · 41% of their budget
- MTMISSION TO THE WORLD PCA INCone grant, 2022 · $26k
- RMREBORN MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2021 · $19k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
Raise Up Global Ministries is committed to educating Christian leaders in communities around the world. The three programs of Raise Up equip the global church by 1 Developing biblically based interactive materials and 2 Training…
Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…
Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.
With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.
To Identify, Affirm, Train, and Mobilize Ephesians 4 evangelists to equip the church for evangelism.
The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…
Ministry coaching and training--provided coaching and training in ministry, mission, and evangelism for churches,church leaders and christian non-profits christian video production--filmed and produced christian bible series for use by…
Leadership Revolution is a ministry founded to develop leaders globally who will spread the gospel and make disciples in their arena of influence.
Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.
Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.
Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opportunity International Inc D/B/a Opportunity International-Us and the most unlike its peers is Transformational Listening Center Nfp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ↗
- Who funds CREATION INVESTMENTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Redeemer City To City ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FOUNDATION TRUST ↗
- Who funds SUNSHINE GOSPEL MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds SERGE GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds TOGETHER CHICAGO INC ↗
- Who funds TRANSFORMATIONAL LISTENING CENTER NFP ↗
- Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds SEEJESUSNET INC ↗
- Who funds ENTRUST ↗
- Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO FELLOWSHIP ↗
- Who funds THE RELEVATE GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds THE FIELD SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LIGHTBEARERS MINISTRIES INT'L INC ↗
- Who funds REBORN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds RESTORE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds Renovare Inc ↗
- Who funds BIBLICALTRAININGORG ↗
- Who funds CANDID ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds UR Chicago Alliance ↗
- Who funds Dallas Willard Ministries ↗
- Who funds LIFE FOCUS MEDIA NFP ↗
- Who funds THE GATHERING PLACE A REFUGE FOR REBUILDING LIVES ↗
- Who funds Resourcing Christian Education International ↗
- Who funds NCF CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
- Who funds A3 ↗
- Who funds HOPE MEDIA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Tyndale House Ministries · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · The Peery Cauthen Foundation Colonial Trust Company · Wheaton College · Hugh and Charlotte Maclellan Charitable Charitable Trust · GiveClear Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sozo Supporting Organization Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Sozo Supporting Organization Fund?
Find your warmest path to Sozo Supporting Organization Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.