· Community foundation
The Movement Foundation Inc
The movement foundation, inc.'s mission is to be a movement for positive change.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 17 grants below total $2,257,362 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,342,988 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,085,626 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k12 grants · $223k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $204k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YOURCAUSE LLC | $886,093 |
| MOVEMENT SCHOOLS SOUTH CAROLINA INC | $501,500 |
| MOVEMENT CHARTER SCHOOL | $442,980 |
| CHARITYVEST | $103,986 |
| CONVOY OF HOPE | $100,000 |
| SPORTS OUTREACH INSTITUTE | $45,000 |
| SPEAK UP | $25,000 |
| LEADERSHIP FOUNDATIONS | $25,000 |
| WILLOW'S WISH FOUNDATION INC | $20,000 |
| CITYSERVE INTERNATIONAL | $20,000 |
| CLEVELAND BAPTIST CHURCH | $15,803 |
| THE HOPE VENTURE | $15,000 |
| FRIENDS OF AGAPE | $15,000 |
| BIG SKY BRAVERY | $12,000 |
| GREATER LANSING AREA DEVELOPMENT | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $448k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
51 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 47 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $654k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MRMovement Resources6× · 2017–2022 · $34M · revenue ×16 · 92% of their budget
- MCMOVEMENT CHARTER SCHOOL5× · 2017–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +530%
- SOSports Outreach Institute Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $493k · revenue +125%
Funded once
- MSMOVEMENT SCHOOLS INCone grant, 2019 · $499k
- RARISE AFTER SCHOOL LLCone grant, 2022 · $150k
- ICIGFT Corporationone grant, 2022 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Orphan's Hands provides a safe home and education for orphaned youth at risk of being trafficked in high-risk countries while bringing the love and hope of Jesus.
We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.
Miracle hill ministries is committed to life transformation for children and adults experiencing homelessness. more information and program outcomes may be found at www.miraclehill.org.
Believing every individual has sacred value, we equip people to impact the world for good through the love of jesus christ.
Hope & home creates ways for amazing people to change the lives of children in foster care. as a nondenominational christian charity, hope & home trains, certifies, and actively supports foster families across the state of colorado.…
The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…
Inspired by Christ's love, Children's HopeChest releases the potential existing within vulnerable communities, starting with the children.
Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.
House of Hope Kansas City is unique, because we work with teens and their parents to find solutions and ultimately, restoration of healthy family relationships. We serve families in crisis with our program for residents to experience the…
Mission: homes for hope partners with the building industry to invest in underserved families around the world for their holistic flourishing unto the glory of god. method: building industry partners donate funds generated from domestic…
Covenant HomeCare provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.
Hope Solutions provides permanent affordable housing coupled with well-executed support services to people who are homeless or at risk to become homeless in Contra Costa County. Support services are individualized for each person or family…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope and the most unlike its peers is Movement Resources. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 21. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
168 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 168 of the 201 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Movement Resources ↗
- Who funds IMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
- Who funds MOVEMENT CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds NCF CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
- Who funds CHARITYVEST INC ↗
- Who funds THE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND ↗
- Who funds MOVEMENT SCHOOLS SOUTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds MOVEMENT SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds Sports Outreach Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds PHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION ↗
- Who funds The Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries ↗
- Who funds DISCOVERY PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds CHARLOTTE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds Denver Leadership Foundation ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds HELPING HANDS SUPPORT INC ↗
- Who funds IGFT Corporation ↗
- Who funds URBANPROMISE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds CHARLOTTE ADVENT MEDIA CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Friends of Agape ↗
- Who funds Global Impact Ministries Inc DBA LOVE LIFE ↗
- Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
- Who funds Samaritan's Feet International ↗
- Who funds ANGELS OF AMERICA'S FALLEN ↗
- Who funds KNOTHOLE FOUNDATION KNOTHOLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds COMFORT CASES INC ↗
- Who funds IDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEVADA PARTNERSHIP FOR HOMELESS YOUTH ↗
- Who funds BONHOEFFER HAUS ↗
- Who funds ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Km Foundation · Servant Foundation · True Homes Foundation Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · GiveClear Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Impact Investing Charitable Foundation Inc · International Generosity Foundation Trust · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · Love Thy Neighbor Too · Foundation for the Carolinas
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Movement Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Vietnam Veterans Workshop Inc Dba New England Center and Home for Veterans — 66% of income from government
- Thunderbolt Council Inc — 29% of income from government
- Harbor House of Central Florida Inc — 24% of income from government
- Eckerd Youth Alternatives Inc — 12% of income from government
- The Baltimore Station Inc — 11% of income from government
- Idignity Inc — 6% of income from government
- St Anns Center for Children Youth and Families — 6% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Lazarus House Inc — 1% of income from government
- Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
- Comfort Cases Inc — 0% of income from government
- K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.