Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Community foundation

Love Thy Neighbor Too

Provide funding to charities in fulfillment of the exempt purposes of national christian charitable foundation, inc.

$6.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$5.2M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Religion$15MPhilanthropy$7.0MEducation$2.8MInternational$1.5MCommunity Improvement$526kHuman Services$375kEmployment$110kHealth$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k15 grants · $268k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $843k
  • $250k+2 grants · $5.6M
$30,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FDM FOUNDATION$5,163,000
VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$400,000
NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC$247,132
CROWN FINANCIAL MINISTRIES$150,000
ALPHA USA$100,000
INTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FOUNDATION TRUST$100,000
LAUSANNE MOVEMENT$75,000
CHARITYVEST INC$61,008
SINAPIS GROUP$60,000
INTERNATIONAL CARE MINISTRIES$50,000
CROSSWORLD$35,000
CITYTEAM MINISTRIES$31,414
FAITH AND WORK MOVEMENT GLOBAL$30,000
GENEROUS CHURCH$25,000
MAILBOX CLUB$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DONALDINA CAMERON HOUSE: $15k → 10%HELP ONE CHILD: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
DC
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$19M · 28 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

28 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
26

Total granted

$19M
$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+26%

Still filing today

89%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationInternationalPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FD
    FAITH DRIVEN MOVEMENTS NC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $12M · revenue +10% · 88% of their budget
  • HOPE INTERNATIONAL
    2× · 2020–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +56%
  • VC
    VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SYSTEM
    2× · 2023–2024 · $806k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • FF
    FDM FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $720k · revenue +100% · 27% of their budget
  • SC
    Simple Charity Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $185k · revenue -29% · 57% of their budget
  • PI
    Praxis Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $101k · revenue +123%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
2
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
3
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

—
4
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
5
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
6
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
7
InitiativeGlobal

To join in the completion of the Great Commission through Scripture Engagement in all languages and every people group.

Religion
8
Christar International Inc

Christar international serves as a catalyst to the network of christar ministries by facilitating and encouraging partnerships with churches who sen dout men and women who proclaim the gospel for life-giving transformation in communitiesw…

Religion
9
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
10
The River Network International

To strengthen church planters through discernment, training, coaching and continuing education.

Religion
11
Raise Up Global Ministries

Raise Up Global Ministries is committed to educating Christian leaders in communities around the world. The three programs of Raise Up equip the global church by 1 Developing biblically based interactive materials and 2 Training…

—
12
Ason International Inc

Assisting national Christian leaders around the world.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opportunity International Inc D/B/a Opportunity International-Us and the most unlike its peers is Anna C Macaskill Schwab and Dwight L Schwab. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Youth Development ServicesCommunity FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsChristian Missionary Organi…Community FoundationsPolicy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%24%5–10yr19%28%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%9%35–55yr16%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%68%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%2%35–55yr16%7%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/66
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,499

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
59/59
Grantees still filing
43/59
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FAITH DRIVEN MOVEMENTS NC — $12,153,500 · Community ImprovementFAITH DRIVEN MOVEMENTS NC+2 more — $71,000 · Community ImprovementIMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $3,071,939 · PhilanthropyIMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE FO…NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC — $1,808,925 · PhilanthropyNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN …IMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE TRUST — $1,264,817 · PhilanthropyIMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE TR…CHARITYVEST INC — $385,327 · PhilanthropyShopmonkey Foundation AKA Maintenance for Moms — $350,000 · Philanthropy+6 more — $702,500 · Philanthropy+6 moreVALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SYSTEM — $805,600 · EducationVALLEY CHRIS…VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS — $778,900 · EducationVALLEY CHRIS…FDM FOUNDATION — $720,000 · EducationFDM FOUNDATI…SINAPIS GROUP INC — $400,184 · EducationSINAPIS GROU…+6 more — $295,616 · Education+6 moreINTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FOUNDATION TRUST — $453,800 · ReligionINTERNATIO…MACLELLAN CENTER FOR GLOBAL CHRISTIAN ED — $450,000 · ReligionMACLELLAN …NEW GENERATIONS — $350,000 · ReligionNEW GENERA…Living on the Edge Ministries Inc — $200,000 · ReligionLiving on …CITYTEAM MINISTRIES — $186,414 · ReligionCITYTEAM M…LAUSANNE COMMITTEE FOR WORLD EVANGELIZATION — $175,000 · ReligionLAUSANNE C…CROWN FINANCIAL MINISTRIES INC — $172,500 · ReligionCROWN FINA…Alpha USA — $140,000 · ReligionPraxis Inc — $101,000 · ReligionRedeemer City To City — $100,000 · Religion+9 more — $340,990 · Religion+9 moreHOPE INTERNATIONAL — $1,110,000 · InternationalCONCENTRIC DEVELOPMENT INC — $75,000 · InternationalEdify — $62,500 · InternationalAgora Enterprises — $50,000 · International+4 more — $55,000 · InternationalFAITH AND WORK MOVEMENT GLOBAL — $245,000 · OtherCROSSWORLD — $180,000 · OtherTHE MAILBOX CLUB INC — $140,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL — $100,000 · OtherTRUSTBRIDGE GLOBAL FOUNDATION — $50,675 · Other+9 more — $120,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL CARE MINISTRIES — $119,609 · Food & Nutrition
Community Improvement$12,224,500Philanthropy$7,583,508Education$3,000,300Religion$2,669,704International$1,352,500Other$835,675Food & Nutrition$119,609

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFAITH DRIVEN MOVEMENTS NC — $12,153,500 over 3y, 88% of budgetIMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $3,071,939 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC — $1,808,925 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE TRUST — $1,264,817 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHOPE INTERNATIONAL — $1,110,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetVALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SYSTEM — $805,600 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetVALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS — $778,900 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFDM FOUNDATION — $720,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetINTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FOUNDATION TRUST — $453,800 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMACLELLAN CENTER FOR GLOBAL CHRISTIAN ED — $450,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetSINAPIS GROUP INC — $400,184 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetCHARITYVEST INC — $385,327 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetShopmonkey Foundation AKA Maintenance for Moms — $350,000 over 2y, 57% of budgetNEW GENERATIONS — $350,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetGivers Legacy Foundation Inc — $225,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLiving on the Edge Ministries Inc — $200,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCITYTEAM MINISTRIES — $186,414 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSimple Charity Inc — $185,000 over 1y, 57% of budgetLAUSANNE COMMITTEE FOR WORLD EVANGELIZATION — $175,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetCROWN FINANCIAL MINISTRIES INC — $172,500 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetTeneo Network Inc — $165,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetTHE MAILBOX CLUB INC — $140,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetAlpha USA — $140,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CARE MINISTRIES — $119,609 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPraxis Inc — $101,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetRedeemer City To City — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOAK ROSE FUND — $100,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetDURHAMCARES INC — $80,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetCONCENTRIC DEVELOPMENT INC — $75,000 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetSCHOLARS OF FINANCE — $75,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetChristianity Today International — $65,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetEdify — $62,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetOcean Accelerator Inc dba Ocean Programs — $61,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetSTRATEGIC RESOURCE GROUP INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGENEROUSCHURCH INC — $50,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetGlobal Trust Partners — $45,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetANNA C MACASKILL SCHWAB AND DWIGHT L SCHWAB — $37,500 over 1y, 29% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOak Grove Christian Ministries — $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetRISE UNIVERSITY PREPARATORY — $17,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSTRATUM — $15,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetDONALDINA CAMERON HOUSE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFellowship of Companies For Christ — $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSTRATEGIC INDIGENOUS MISSIONS — $12,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetTHE GATHERING — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVER OF LIFE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR CHRISTOFORMITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationThe Maclellan Foundat…Christian Community F…The Signatry Charitab…Christian Community F…International Generos…Chattanooga Christian…Gordon Christian TrustGiveClear FoundationThe Pilgrim FoundationPinetops FoundationDoll Family Foundation
Servant FoundationKS39.2× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · International Generosity Foundation Trust · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Gordon Christian Trust · GiveClear Foundation · The Pilgrim Foundation · Pinetops Foundation · Doll Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Love Thy Neighbor Too funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Love Thy Neighbor Too?

Find your warmest path to Love Thy Neighbor Too through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines