· Public charity
Km Foundation
To provide funding to charities in fulfillment of the exempt purposes of nccf.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 27 grants below total $284,158 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $344,158 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $60,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INTERNATIONAL COOPERATING MINISTRIES | $20,000 |
| NATIONAL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC | $14,158 |
| NOURISH NC | $10,000 |
| FORWARD HOPE INC | $10,000 |
| VINE MAPLE PLACE | $10,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC | $10,000 |
| ONE SIMPLE WISH | $10,000 |
| FOOD FOR DAYS | $10,000 |
| FOOTPRINTS OF FIGHT | $10,000 |
| STRONGER FAMILIES | $10,000 |
| MARBLE FALLS ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB | $10,000 |
| MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH HILLS | $10,000 |
| FOSTER VILLAGE CHARLOTTE | $10,000 |
| TEAM IMPACT | $10,000 |
| LATISHA'S HOUSE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $825k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $210k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ELEQUIP Leadership Inc4× · 2020–2023 · $1.5M · revenue +44%
- TRThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries5× · 2020–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +32%
- SOSports Outreach Institute Inc3× · 2020–2023 · $105k · revenue +147%
Funded once
- EEdifygraduatedone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +95%
- GBGOD BEHIND BARS INCone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue 0%
- ECEMERGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +13%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Samaritan House is committed to fostering personal safety, growth, and self-sufficiency in adults and their children through freedom from domestic violence, sexual assault, and human trafficking and removing their risks of homelessness.
Hope & home creates ways for amazing people to change the lives of children in foster care. as a nondenominational christian charity, hope & home trains, certifies, and actively supports foster families across the state of colorado.…
Safe Harbor provides a faith-based community for rebuilding, renewing, and recovery. We work together with volunteers and other nonprofit organizations to provide a wide range of services to those experiencing homelessness, single mothers,…
The Children's Home Society of North Carolina's mission is to promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.
Our mission is to offer hope and support, enabling children and their mothers to break the cycle of homelessness by empowering them to become part of mainstream society as active, productive citizens through programs and special events…
We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.
To operate residential and non-residential programs for victims of domestic violence.
A retreat program that enables families who are experiencing serious illness or crisis to regain strength, mend spirits and just be families and kids again.
Provide a caring, advocating, safe, and educationally based environment for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault.
We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.
Providing transitional housing and quality restorative services that move women and their children to lives of stability independence and new life.
Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Mary's Home for Children and the most unlike its peers is Kennedys Angel Gowns Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
235 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 235 of the 269 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EQUIP Leadership Inc ↗
- Who funds The Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries ↗
- Who funds HIINGA INC ↗
- Who funds Sports Outreach Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ↗
- Who funds Givers Legacy Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Edify ↗
- Who funds GOD BEHIND BARS INC ↗
- Who funds THE MOVEMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HELP 4 KIDS ↗
- Who funds EDMARC INC ↗
- Who funds Latishas House Foundation ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds EMERGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KEIZER ROTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SIMPSON HOUSING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds VINE MAPLE PLACE ↗
- Who funds Congregations for Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds KinderMourn Inc ↗
- Who funds Rainbow Express Ministries ↗
- Who funds CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds RAISING GIRLS ↗
- Who funds No Longer Fatherless Inc ↗
- Who funds CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF TIDEWATER INC ↗
- Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
- Who funds Women's and Children's Alliance ↗
- Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL AND WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds Denver Leadership Foundation ↗
- Who funds Samaritan's Feet International ↗
- Who funds AGAPE VILLAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN IN CRISIS INC ↗
- Who funds Food For Days ↗
- Who funds ONE SMALL STEP INC CLOTHES CABIN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Movement Foundation Inc · Impact Investing Charitable Foundation Inc · True Homes Foundation Inc · The Leon Levine Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Speedway Children's Charities · Hampton Roads Community Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · The Gap Foundation · Windermere Foundation · Philip L Van Every Foundation · Sentara Health
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Km Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Life Crisis Center Inc — 24% of income from government
- Care Dimensions Inc — 14% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- No Longer Fatherless Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
- K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Km Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Km Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.