· Public charity
The Map Fund Inc
To support innovation and cross-cultural exploration in new works of live performance.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 58 grants below total $1,765,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,908,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,143,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k57 grants · $1.7M
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Brooklyn Arts Exchange | $60,000 |
| Craigardan Inc | $30,000 |
| Theater Latt Da | $30,000 |
| TALILOMARFILMUSIC LLC | $30,000 |
| Ensemble Robot Inc | $30,000 |
| Heidi Duckler Dance Theatre Northwest | $30,000 |
| ANIKAYAAkhra Inc | $30,000 |
| Theatre Novi Most | $30,000 |
| AXIS Dance Company | $30,000 |
| VisionIntoArt Presents Inc | $30,000 |
| Bodhi Tree Concerts | $30,000 |
| American Academy of Arts and Letters | $30,000 |
| Experimental Sound Studio | $30,000 |
| CARNE VIVA DANCE THEATRE | $30,000 |
| Oye Group Inc | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
49 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 37 since wound down; 46 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
FRACTURED ATLAS INC6× · 2017–2023 · $615k · revenue +71%- TPTHE PERFORMANCE ZONE INC4× · 2017–2021 · $176k · revenue +154%
- IFIntersection for the Arts5× · 2017–2024 · $139k · revenue +48%
Funded once
- TTTHE TANK LTDone grant, 2023 · $90k · revenue -3%
- TYTHE YES LAB INCone grant, 2019 · $45k · revenue -69%
- TVTEATRO VISIONone grant, 2019 · $45k · revenue +19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Cultural and educational performances
Lively productions presents new work for the stage by emerging artists, and seeks to create innovative theatrical opportunities in a world increasingly defined by real time interactions and new technologies
On the Boards' mission is to invest in leading contemporary performing artists near and far and connect them to a diverse range of communities interested in forward-thinking art and ideas.
Develop recognition of international theater
The Ghost Road Company develops original performance pieces employing Ensemble-Devising and collaborative creation techniques creating experimental theatrical works that are highly physical visceral and visual The companys work emphasizes…
As creative producers, we are devoted to the production and presentation of groundbreaking experiences in contemporary performance that use innovative approaches to collaboration, technology, and social engagement. As a service…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Theater Et Al Inc Dba the Chocolate Factory Theater and the most unlike its peers is Fathomers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
238 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 238 of the 282 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds THE PERFORMANCE ZONE INC ↗
- Who funds Intersection for the Arts ↗
- Who funds DANCERS GROUP ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN ARTS EXCHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Theater Labrador Inc dba New Georges ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK LIVE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds ENSEMBLE ROBOT INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds THE TANK LTD ↗
- Who funds Earshot Jazz Society of Seattle ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT ARTISTS INC ↗
- Who funds YERBA BUENA CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds ARTHUR AVILES TYPICAL THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds TEADA PRODUCTIONS ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE THEATER COMPANY ↗
- Who funds JESS CURTISGRAVITY INC ↗
- Who funds ZACCHO SF ↗
- Who funds CONTRA-TIEMPO ↗
- Who funds PUERTO RICAN FOLKLORIC DANCE INC ↗
- Who funds RAGAMALA DANCE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PERFORMANCE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds DETROIT PUPPET COMPANY ↗
- Who funds ROSY SIMAS DANSE INC ↗
- Who funds ALLISON ORR DANCE INC ↗
- Who funds LOOKINGGLASS THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR PROVIDENCE PARKS ↗
- Who funds Home for Contemporary Theatre and Art Ltd dba HERE Art Center ↗
- Who funds AXIS Dance Company ↗
- Who funds SPRINGBOARD FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds THEATER MITU INC ↗
- Who funds Everett ↗
- Who funds El Teatro Campesino ↗
- Who funds THE YES LAB INC ↗
- Who funds TEATRO VISION ↗
- Who funds TAIKOARTS MIDWEST ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Destiny Arts Center ↗
- Who funds FIRST VOICE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New England Foundation for the Arts Incorporated · Mid Atlantic Arts Inc · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · New Music USA Inc · The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc · The Shubert Foundation Inc · Kenneth Rainin Foundation · Phyllis C Wattis Foundation · The Zellerbach Family Foundation · National Performance Network Inc · Doris Duke Charitable Foundation Inc · Jerome Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Map Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Ensemble Robot Incorporated — 20% of income from government
- Anikaya Akhra Inc — 18% of income from government
- Tulsa Community Foundation — 11% of income from government
- Passage Theatre Company Inc — 10% of income from government
- Guerilla Opera Inc — 7% of income from government
- Silk Road Project Inc — 4% of income from government
- Boston Dance Theater — 4% of income from government
- Third Angle New Music Ensemble — 3% of income from government
- The Theater Offensive Inc — 2% of income from government
- Merrimack Repertory Theatre Inc — 2% of income from government
- Jean Appolon Expressions Inc — 1% of income from government
- Emerson College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Map Fund Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Map Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.