· Public charity
New Music USA Inc
To nurture a vibrant and inclusive community for artists and listeners by supporting the creation, performance, and appreciation of new music throughout the united states.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 88 grants below total $657,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,131,050 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $474,050 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k73 grants · $507k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE CHURCH OF OUR SAVIOUR | $10,000 |
| BRIDGE TO EVERYWHERE | $10,000 |
| FOUND SOUND NATION INC | $10,000 |
| NON-OP INC | $10,000 |
| MONDAY EVENING CONCERTS | $10,000 |
| FREER RECORDS INC | $10,000 |
| ZACHARY MOWITZ | $10,000 |
| LIBERARTE INC | $10,000 |
| PIANO SPHERES | $10,000 |
| BRIGHTWORK NEWMUSIC | $10,000 |
| STREET SYMPHONY PROJECT INC | $10,000 |
| RESONANCE COLLECTIVE | $10,000 |
| SOUTH SIDE SYMPHONY LLC | $10,000 |
| ANGEL CITY ARTS | $10,000 |
| DC6 SINGERS COLLECTIVE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
105 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2025, 60 since wound down; 42 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $322k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TSThe Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra Society2× · 2019–2023 · $110k · revenue +58%
- CHCOPLAND HOUSE INC6× · 2019–2025 · $42k · revenue +139%
- ACAMERICAN COMPOSERS ORCHESTRA INC4× · 2021–2025 · $35k · revenue +149%
Funded once
- SDSOUTH DAKOTA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAone grant, 2019 · $108k · revenue +14%
- CSCHAMPAIGN-URBANA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAone grant, 2019 · $86k · revenue 0%
- PSPITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INCone grant, 2024 · $29k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To present and promote contemporary classical music through innovative, interdisciplinary performances; to support living composers; and to engage diverse audiences through education, collaboration, and community-based programming.…
The American Chamber Ensemble is a consortium of distinguished musicians whose concerts explore the music for piano with strings, woodwinds and/or voice, presenting both great standard repertoire and living American composers.
Cantata Profana, Inc. (www.cantataprofana.com) is a vocal and instrumental chamber ensemble that presents concerts of classical and chamber music ranging from the Baroque to modern eras with a unique narrative style. Our purpose is to…
Constella Arts produces performances, educational presentations and digital content, along the way changing how people perceive classical music and the performing arts.
Constellation is a performing arts presenter with an emphasis on forward- thinking practices, particularly in the areas of jazz, improvised, experimental, and contemporary classical music.
ARTRONIKA is a collective of Los Angeles based artists that produce immersive arts programming showcasing an array of South Asian talent and culture. Through innovative and inclusive events, we reimagine traditional music, art, and…
MUSE is an inclusive and feminist choral community advocating for peace and social justice. We unite our voices to raise awareness and inspire change in ourselves, our audiences, and our world through partnerships that honor the humanity…
The purpose of CUT CIRCLE is to bring late-medieval and Renaissance music to life. Reimagining early music as a site of gritty, intense experiences, Cut Circle's performances are distinguished by their energy and emotional sensitivity.…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Third Coast Percussion Nfp and the most unlike its peers is Girls Rock Des Moines. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
291 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 291 of the 349 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra Society ↗
- Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CHAMPAIGN-URBANA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds COPLAND HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT ARTISTS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COMPOSERS ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds ROULETTE INTERMEDIUM INC ↗
- Who funds PITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Shaleigh Dance Works ↗
- Who funds PRISM QUARTET INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds New Music Chicago ↗
- Who funds IMANI WINDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BETH MORRISON PROJECTS INC ↗
- Who funds RAGAMALA DANCE ↗
- Who funds RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds LUNA COMPOSITION LAB INC ↗
- Who funds FLYAWAY PRODUCTIONS ↗
- Who funds HEIDI DUCKLER DANCE ↗
- Who funds M3 MUSICIANS INC ↗
- Who funds THE LOS ANGELES CHAMBER ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE JAZZ GALLERY ↗
- Who funds ALONZO KING LINES BALLET ↗
- Who funds DALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds HARLEM STAGE INC ↗
- Who funds COMPOSERS NOW INC ↗
- Who funds MONDAY EVENING CONCERTS ↗
- Who funds ARS NOVA WORKSHOP INC ↗
- Who funds THE INDUSTRY PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Creative Music Foundation ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CONTEMPORARY ENSEMBLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Audium Incorporated ↗
- Who funds Earshot Jazz Society of Seattle ↗
- Who funds ORPHEUS CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds FREER RECORDS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Aaron Copland Fund for Music Inc Co Alter Kendrick & Baron LLP · The Amphion Foundation Inc Co Alter Kendrick & Baron LLP · Mid Atlantic Arts Inc · The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc · Chamber Music America Inc · The Map Fund Inc · New England Foundation for the Arts Incorporated · The Fan Fox and Leslie R Samuels Foundation Inc · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · Ann & Gordon Getty Foundation · The Harkness Foundation for Dance Inc · The Gladys Krieble Delmas Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization New Music USA Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Trilogy an Opera Company — 34% of income from government
- Nimbus Dance Works Inc — 22% of income from government
- Anikaya Akhra Inc — 18% of income from government
- Cambridge Community Center Inc — 8% of income from government
- Guerilla Opera Inc — 7% of income from government
- Axelrod Performing Arts Center Inc — 6% of income from government
- Boston Modern Orchestra Project Inc — 4% of income from government
- The Celebrity Series of Boston Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.