Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Minnesota · Nonprofit

BLACK LABEL MOVEMENT

BLACK LABEL MOVEMENT (Minnesota) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $281,089 to it, the largest being The McKnight Foundation ($185,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$217k
Revenue FY2025
5
Funders on record
$281k
Grants received
$100k
Net assets
3/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 42%

Against its field

BLACK LABEL MOVEMENT is better cushioned than half of the 10,664 arts & culture nonprofits its size.

Operating margin1% · below the median
Months of reserve5.6mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)8% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 10,664 arts & culture nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($120k) Expenses 100 ($105k) Net assets 100 ($78k)2018 Revenue 0 ($0) Net assets 0 ($0)2019 Revenue 147 ($177k) Expenses 164 ($172k) Net assets 74 ($58k)2020 Revenue 154 ($185k) Expenses 162 ($169k) Net assets 92 ($72k)2021 Revenue 49 ($58k) Expenses 76 ($80k) Net assets 65 ($51k)2022 Revenue 139 ($167k) Expenses 168 ($176k) Net assets 54 ($42k)2023 Revenue 178 ($214k) Expenses 163 ($171k) Net assets 109 ($86k)2024 Revenue 89 ($107k) Expenses 90 ($94k) Net assets 125 ($98k)2025 Revenue 180 ($217k) Expenses 205 ($214k) Net assets 128 ($100k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (180)Expenses (205)Net assets (128)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

49% of BLACK LABEL MOVEMENT’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (64% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 19,459 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$16k
17
18
$5k
19
$16k
20
$22k
21
$9k
22
$44k
23
$13k
24
$2k
25
5.6
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $12k → $65k.

Funder
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
The Map Fund Incunclassified
$30k
New Music USA Incunclassified
$6k
funders
1
2
3
2
2
3
1

2 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)21% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of BLACK LABEL MOVEMENT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

BLACK LABEL MOVEMENT leans on a few funders — its largest provides 66% of grant income and the top three 98%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

34% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund BLACK LABEL MOVEMENT.

66%
largest funder
98%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 71% · 2020 77% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 54%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

84% of BLACK LABEL MOVEMENT's grant income comes from Minnesota funders.

MN
NY

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

19
20
21
22
23
Minnesota out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $60k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 5 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like BLACK LABEL MOVEMENT

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Minnesota

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

77% of spending goes to programs.

Program 77%Management 19%Fundraising 4%

Governance

12
board members
92%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

94%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MN

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BLACK LABEL MOVEMENT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds BLACK LABEL MOVEMENT?
BLACK LABEL MOVEMENT (Minnesota) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $281,089 to it, the largest being The McKnight Foundation ($185,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does BLACK LABEL MOVEMENT have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $281,089 in grants to BLACK LABEL MOVEMENT, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of BLACK LABEL MOVEMENT?
The McKnight Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $185,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like BLACK LABEL MOVEMENT find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Minnesota. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing