· Private foundation
The Coleman Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k33 grants · $105k
- $10k–50k54 grants · $1.2M
- $50k–250k96 grants · $7.3M
- $250k+2 grants · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Chicago Community Foundation | $250,000 |
| South Side Healthy Community Organization | $250,000 |
| The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois | $200,000 |
| Growing Season-Illinois Inc | $200,000 |
| Saint Anthony Hospital | $150,000 |
| University of Chicago | $130,000 |
| Chicago Urban League | $125,000 |
| West Side Forward | $125,000 |
| Little City Foundation | $125,000 |
| Matching Gifts - Details available upon request | $116,508 |
| Urban Juncture Foundation | $100,000 |
| Allies for Community Business | $100,000 |
| Equal Hope | $100,000 |
| Good Food Catalyst | $100,000 |
| Northwest Side Community Development Corporation | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $12.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
187 repeat relationships — 106 still active in FY2024, 81 since wound down; 48 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCLEARBROOK6× · 2019–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +74%
- UOUniversity of Chicago Medical Center5× · 2019–2023 · $1.8M · revenue +72%
Northwestern University3× · 2019–2021 · $1.4M · revenue +34%
Funded once
- UWUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INCone grant, 2020 · $500k · revenue -50%
- ASAccion Serving Illinois & Indianaone grant, 2020 · $225k
- WWWellness West Incgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $178k · revenue +77%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…
The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…
The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.
Chh honors every person's right to a home and health care, by bridging the housing and health care systems, to improve the lives of chicagoans experiencing homelessness.
The aids foundation of chicago mobilizes communities to create equity and justice for people living with and vulnerable to hiv and related chronic disease.
Provide community-based residential housing to adults with autism and/or severe developmental disabilities. also provide developmental training and other supports to this same population.
At legal aid chicago, we work together to provide high quality civil legal aid to people living in poverty and other vulnerable groups.through advocacy, education, collaboration, and litigation we empower individuals, protect fundamental…
The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.
Chicago family health center will promote health, work to prevent disease and provide treatment through the delivery of quality, accessible primary healtcare that is culturally sensitive, affordable, and responsive to community and…
The chicago children's advocacy center unites public, private, and community partners to ensure the safety, health, and well-being of abused children.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health and Medicine Policy Research Group and the most unlike its peers is Collegiate Entrepreneurs Organization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
265 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 265 of the 320 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CLEARBROOK ↗
- Who funds University of Chicago Medical Center ↗
- Who funds Northwestern University ↗
- Who funds Equal Hope ↗
- Who funds Envision Unlimited ↗
- Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
- Who funds SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds Center for Independence through Conductive Education Inc ↗
- Who funds The Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation) ↗
- Who funds ASPIRITECH NFP ↗
- Who funds Saint Anthony Hospital ↗
- Who funds PAWS CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds Keystone Alliance ↗
- Who funds PACTT Learning Center ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds SARAH'S INN ↗
- Who funds THE ARTS OF LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY SEGUIN OF GREATER CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO URBAN LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds DEVCORP NORTH DBA ROGERS PARK BUSINESS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds La Rabida Children's Hospital ↗
- Who funds MICHAEL REESE HEALTH TRUST ↗
- Who funds Almost Home Kids ↗
- Who funds JENNIFER S FALLICK CANCER SUPPORT CENTER ↗
- Who funds YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds L'ARCHE CHICAGO INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIES FOR COMMUNITY BUSINESS INC ↗
- Who funds Wellness House ↗
- Who funds FAR SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds ILLINOIS ARTS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC ↗
- Who funds ASPIRE OF ILLINOIS ↗
- Who funds GREATER ENGLEWOOD COMMUNITY DEV CORP ↗
- Who funds FUTURE FOUNDERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST COLETTA'S OF ILLINOIS ↗
- Who funds WEST SIDE FORWARD ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Circle of Service Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Fifth Third Chicagoland Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Forefront · The Chicago Community Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities · Chicago Foundation for Women · Lloyd a Fry Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Coleman Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Intersection of Change Inc — 20% of income from government
- The University of Tampa Incorporated — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Coleman Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Coleman Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.