Skip to content
The Coleman Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

The Coleman Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$9.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
185
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$28MCommunity Improvement$8.5MHuman Services$5.7MPhilanthropy$4.2MEducation$2.8MEmployment$1.7MArts & Culture$1.5MFood & Nutrition$1.2MOther$0
02FY2024 · 185 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k33 grants · $105k
  • $10k–50k54 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k96 grants · $7.3M
  • $250k+2 grants · $500k
$50,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$182M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Chicago Community Foundation$250,000
South Side Healthy Community Organization$250,000
The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois$200,000
Growing Season-Illinois Inc$200,000
Saint Anthony Hospital$150,000
University of Chicago$130,000
Little City Foundation$125,000
West Side Forward$125,000
Chicago Urban League$125,000
Matching Gifts - Details available upon request$116,508
Growing Season-Illinois Inc$100,000
Foundation of Little Village$100,000
Puerto Rican Cultural Center$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
Greater Southwest Development Corporation$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $12.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Easterseals Joliet Region Inc: $100k → 7%Illinois Association of Rehabilitation Facilities Inc: $100k → 11%Trinity Services Inc: $73k → 7%Aspiritech NFP: $500k → 8%YWCA Metropolitan Chicago: $100k → 14%YWCA Metropolitan Chicago: $100k → 14%YWCA Metropolitan Chicago: $100k → 14%YWCA Metropolitan Chicago: $100k → 14%YWCA Metropolitan Chicago: $75k → 14%Almost Home Kids: $150k → 7%Almost Home Kids: $150k → 7%Almost Home Kids: $125k → 7%Aspiritech NFP: $100k → 14%Aspire: $233k → 14%Aspire: $78k → 14%Gateway to Learning: $100k → 14%UCP Seguin of Greater Chicago: $150k → 14%United Cerebral Palsy Seguin of Greater Chicago: $75k → 14%UCP Seguin of Greater Chicago: $73k → 14%South Chicago Parents and Friends: $100k → 14%Clearbrook: $489k → 14%Clearbrook: $472k → 14%Clearbrook: $352k → 14%Clearbrook: $300k → 14%Clearbrook: $117k → 14%Clearbrook: $100k → 14%Clearbrook: $73k → 14%Park Lawn Association: $133k → 14%Devices 4 the Disabled: $100k → 14%Envision Unlimited: $400k → 14%Envision Unlimited: $375k → 14%Envision Unlimited: $78k → 14%Sarah's Inn: $100k → 14%Cancer Support Center: $156k → 14%Cancer Support Center: $100k → 14%Cancer Support Center: $100k → 14%Cancer Support Center: $75k → 14%Helping Hand Center: $83k → 14%Ada S McKinley Community Services Inc: $120k → 14%Ada S McKinley Community Services Inc: $85k → 14%Sarah's Inn: $400k → 14%Shore Community Services Inc: $125k → 14%Shore Community Services Inc: $88k → 14%Orchard Village: $86k → 14%Growing Season-Illinois Inc: $200k → 14%Growing Season-Illinois Inc: $100k → 14%Little City Foundation: $125k → 14%Little City Foundation: $71k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$53M · 187 repeat orgs$5.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

187 repeat relationships: 106 still active in FY2024, 81 since wound down; 48 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

187
81

Total granted

$53M
$3.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+12%

Still filing today

88%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • C
    CLEARBROOK
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +74%
  • UO
    University of Chicago Medical Center
    5× · 2019–2023 · $1.8M · revenue +72%
  • Northwestern University
    3× · 2019–2021 · $1.4M · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC
    one grant, 2020 · $500k · revenue -50%
  • AS
    Accion Serving Illinois & Indiana
    one grant, 2020 · $225k
  • WW
    Wellness West Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $178k · revenue +77%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
2
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
3
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
4
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
5
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
6
Center for Housing and Health

Chh honors every person's right to a home and health care, by bridging the housing and health care systems, to improve the lives of chicagoans experiencing homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
7
Aids Foundation of Chicago

The aids foundation of chicago mobilizes communities to create equity and justice for people living with and vulnerable to hiv and related chronic disease.

Health
8
Rimland Services Nfp

Provide community-based residential housing to adults with autism and/or severe developmental disabilities. also provide developmental training and other supports to this same population.

Human Services
9
Legal Aid Chicago

At legal aid chicago, we work together to provide high quality civil legal aid to people living in poverty and other vulnerable groups.through advocacy, education, collaboration, and litigation we empower individuals, protect fundamental…

Crime & Legal
10
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
11
Chicago Family Health Center Inc

Chicago family health center will promote health, work to prevent disease and provide treatment through the delivery of quality, accessible primary healtcare that is culturally sensitive, affordable, and responsive to community and…

—
12
Chicago Children's Advocacy Center

The chicago children's advocacy center unites public, private, and community partners to ensure the safety, health, and well-being of abused children.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health and Medicine Policy Research Group; the most unlike its peers is Collegiate Entrepreneurs Organization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

265 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 265 of the 320 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
51
Early backer (in before they grew)
259/265
Grantees still filing
192/265
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,943,000 · OtherCHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $756,000 · OtherPACTT Learning Center: $745,000 · OtherPAWS CHICAGO: $777,500 · OtherThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation): $834,750 · Other+83 more: $16,254,653 · Other+83 moreUniversity of Chicago Medical Center: $1,751,000 · HealthUniversity of Chicago Medi…Equal Hope: $1,145,000 · HealthEqual HopeRush University Medical Center: $1,010,100 · HealthRush University Medical Ce…SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $930,000 · HealthSINAI HEALTH SYSTEMSaint Anthony Hospital: $797,000 · HealthSaint Anthony HospitalKeystone Alliance: $745,500 · HealthKeystone AllianceMICHAEL REESE HEALTH TRUST: $600,000 · HealthLa Rabida Children's Hospital: $600,000 · HealthL'ARCHE CHICAGO INC: $570,000 · HealthWellness House: $525,600 · Health+31 more: $4,496,252 · Health+31 moreCLEARBROOK: $2,082,558 · Human ServicesCLEARBROOKEnvision Unlimited: $1,015,000 · Human ServicesEnvision UnlimitedASPIRITECH NFP: $804,150 · Human ServicesASPIRITECH NFPSARAH'S INN: $634,625 · Human ServicesUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY SEGUIN OF GREATER CHICAGO: $615,805 · Human ServicesAlmost Home Kids: $587,025 · Human ServicesJENNIFER S FALLICK CANCER SUPPORT CENTER: $582,950 · Human ServicesYWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $575,000 · Human ServicesASPIRE OF ILLINOIS: $481,853 · Human Services+32 more: $5,128,344 · Human Services+32 moreCenter for Independence through Conductive Education Inc: $927,275 · EducationFUTURE FOUNDERS FOUNDATION: $457,100 · EducationNorth Central College: $212,000 · EducationPARK LAWN SCHOOL AND ACTIVITY CENTER IN C: $142,500 · EducationCAL'S ALL-STAR ANGEL FOUNDATION INC: $139,275 · EducationDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $132,500 · EducationUniversity of Chicago: $130,000 · EducationELIM CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $115,000 · EducationNATIONAL DISABILITY INSTITUTE INC: $100,000 · Education+4 more: $290,000 · EducationALLIES FOR COMMUNITY BUSINESS INC: $527,500 · Community ImprovementFAR SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $525,200 · Community ImprovementGREATER SOUTHWEST DEVELOPMENT CORP: $408,750 · Community ImprovementURBAN JUNCTURE FOUNDATION: $350,000 · Community ImprovementSMALL BUSINESS MAJORITY FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 · Community ImprovementQUAD COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION NFP: $168,675 · Community ImprovementCHICAGO CARES INC: $100,000 · Community ImprovementNEW COVENANT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $100,000 · Community ImprovementCHICAGO URBAN LEAGUE: $612,500 · EmploymentWEST SIDE FORWARD: $423,600 · EmploymentAVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE: $295,000 · EmploymentHAVE DREAMS: $256,000 · EmploymentLITTLE VILLAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250,000 · EmploymentSERTOMA STAR SERVICES INC: $170,000 · EmploymentThe Cara Program: $83,925 · EmploymentNorthwestern University: $1,380,800 · Recreation & SportsWESTERN DUPAGE SRA FOUNDATION: $82,125 · Recreation & Sports
Other$22,310,903Health$13,170,452Human Services$12,507,310Education$2,645,650Community Improvement$2,480,125Employment$2,091,025Recreation & Sports$1,462,925

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLEARBROOK: $2,082,558 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago Medical Center: $1,751,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $1,380,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEqual Hope: $1,145,000 over 6y, 24% of budgetEnvision Unlimited: $1,015,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $1,010,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $930,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCenter for Independence through Conductive Education Inc: $927,275 over 6y, 12% of budgetThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation): $834,750 over 6y, 28% of budgetASPIRITECH NFP: $804,150 over 5y, 6.8% of budgetSaint Anthony Hospital: $797,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO: $777,500 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetKeystone Alliance: $745,500 over 4y, 8.1% of budgetPACTT Learning Center: $745,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetWOMEN'S BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $720,000 over 6y, 5.6% of budgetSARAH'S INN: $634,625 over 5y, 11% of budgetTHE ARTS OF LIFE INC: $620,000 over 6y, 21% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY SEGUIN OF GREATER CHICAGO: $615,805 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCHICAGO URBAN LEAGUE: $612,500 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetDEVCORP NORTH DBA ROGERS PARK BUSINESS ALLIANCE: $611,500 over 6y, 18% of budgetMICHAEL REESE HEALTH TRUST: $600,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLa Rabida Children's Hospital: $600,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAlmost Home Kids: $587,025 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetJENNIFER S FALLICK CANCER SUPPORT CENTER: $582,950 over 6y, 11% of budgetYWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $575,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetL'ARCHE CHICAGO INC: $570,000 over 6y, 21% of budgetALLIES FOR COMMUNITY BUSINESS INC: $527,500 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetWellness House: $525,600 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetFAR SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $525,200 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $500,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetILLINOIS ARTS ALLIANCE: $500,000 over 3y, 67% of budgetASPIRE OF ILLINOIS: $481,853 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetGREATER ENGLEWOOD COMMUNITY DEV CORP: $475,000 over 5y, 28% of budgetFUTURE FOUNDERS FOUNDATION: $457,100 over 6y, 20% of budgetST COLETTA'S OF ILLINOIS: $440,400 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetWEST SIDE FORWARD: $423,600 over 5y, 13% of budgetGATEWAY TO LEARNING: $414,044 over 6y, 8.7% of budgetGREATER SOUTHWEST DEVELOPMENT CORP: $408,750 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetADA S MCKINLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $405,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSERTOMA CENTRE INC: $375,575 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $365,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCTF ILLINOIS: $354,287 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetURBAN JUNCTURE FOUNDATION: $350,000 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetLITTLE CITY FOUNDATION: $343,875 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetDESIGNS FOR DIGNITY: $332,575 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetEL VALOR CORPORATION: $330,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetRAY GRAHAM ASSOCIATION FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $317,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSMALL BUSINESS MAJORITY FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLEARBROOK ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds Equal Hope ↗
  • Who funds Envision Unlimited ↗
  • Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds Center for Independence through Conductive Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation) ↗
  • Who funds ASPIRITECH NFP ↗
  • Who funds Saint Anthony Hospital ↗
  • Who funds PAWS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Keystone Alliance ↗
  • Who funds PACTT Learning Center ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SARAH'S INN ↗
  • Who funds THE ARTS OF LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY SEGUIN OF GREATER CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO URBAN LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds DEVCORP NORTH DBA ROGERS PARK BUSINESS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds MICHAEL REESE HEALTH TRUST ↗
  • Who funds La Rabida Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds Almost Home Kids ↗
  • Who funds JENNIFER S FALLICK CANCER SUPPORT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds L'ARCHE CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIES FOR COMMUNITY BUSINESS INC ↗
  • Who funds Wellness House ↗
  • Who funds FAR SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS ARTS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds ASPIRE OF ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds GREATER ENGLEWOOD COMMUNITY DEV CORP ↗
  • Who funds FUTURE FOUNDERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST COLETTA'S OF ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds WEST SIDE FORWARD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Metropo…Circle of Service Fou…Polk Bros Foundation …Fifth Third Chicagola…Robert R McCormick Fo…ForefrontThe Chicago Community…John D and Catherine …Arie and Ida Crown Me…George M Eisenberg Fo…Chicago Foundation fo…Lloyd a Fry Foundation
United Way of Metropolitan Chicago IncIL89.5× affinity54 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Circle of Service Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Fifth Third Chicagoland Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Forefront · The Chicago Community Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities · Chicago Foundation for Women · Lloyd a Fry Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Coleman Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Coleman Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Intersection of Change Inc: 20% of income from government
  • The University of Tampa Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
78report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Coleman Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Coleman Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 320 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Coleman’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home