· Private foundation
The Campos Epc Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k36 grants · $74k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $110k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $278k
- $250k+2 grants · $838k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION | $537,500 |
| SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY | $300,000 |
| BOARD OF EDUCATION CITY OF ATLANTA | $177,538 |
| STADIUM MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC | $100,000 |
| COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $45,435 |
| CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI | $20,739 |
| TEAM PIKES PEAK LLC | $14,130 |
| OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE | $10,158 |
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF BLACKS IN ENERGY MINNESOTA CHAPTER | $10,000 |
| MIDWEST ENERGY ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| ENERGY COORDINATING AGENCY OF PHILADELPHIA INC | $8,000 |
| PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK | $7,628 |
| DENVER ACADEMY | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA MERCED FOUNDATION | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
27 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 36 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $399k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CSCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $724k · revenue +54%
- DADENVER ACADEMY INC4× · 2019–2024 · $600k · revenue +38%
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY2× · 2023–2024 · $375k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- DPDENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLSone grant, 2017 · $261k
- SDSan Diego Unified School Districtone grant, 2021 · $140k
- CSCOLORADO SCHOOL OF MINESone grant, 2017 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.
We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.
The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
The university of denver (du) is a higher educational institution, providing both undergraduate and graduate degrees - the mission of the university of denver is to promote learning by engaging with students (continued on schedule o)in…
We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.
To provide essential value to our members, their careers, our partners, and the public, asce will: facilitate the advancement of technology; encourage and provide the tools for lifelong learning; promote professionalism and the profession;…
The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.
The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is East High School Rugby Football Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 118 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DENVER ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds MIDWEST ENERGY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE COLORADO EDUCATION INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds EAST HIGH SCHOOL RUGBY FOOTBALL CLUB ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds Soroptimist International of Rio Vista ↗
- Who funds ENERGY COORDINATING AGENCY OF PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
- Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds The Resurrection Project ↗
- Who funds THE GABBY KRAUSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds College is Real Inc ↗
- Who funds UTAH STEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MIRACLES FOR KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds REALITY CHANGERS ↗
- Who funds MAX S LOVE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Future Construction Leaders Foundation ↗
- Who funds White Memorial Med Cntr Charitable Fdtn Adventist Health White Memorial Ch Fdtn ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Xcel Energy Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · Mile High United Way Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · California Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Campos Epc Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Campos Epc Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Campos Epc Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.