Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Campos Epc Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
46
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$538k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$3.9MRecreation & Sports$171kScience & Tech$130kAnimals$50kHealth$38kEnvironment$31kYouth Development$26kHuman Services$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k36 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $278k
  • $250k+2 grants · $838k
$2,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$235k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION$537,500
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY$300,000
BOARD OF EDUCATION CITY OF ATLANTA$177,538
STADIUM MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC$100,000
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$45,435
CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI$20,739
TEAM PIKES PEAK LLC$14,130
OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE$10,158
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF BLACKS IN ENERGY MINNESOTA CHAPTER$10,000
MIDWEST ENERGY ASSOCIATION$10,000
ENERGY COORDINATING AGENCY OF PHILADELPHIA INC$8,000
PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK$7,628
DENVER ACADEMY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA MERCED FOUNDATION$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%A KID'S PLACE OF TAMPA BAY INC: $2k → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%Together Friends Organization Inc: $1k → 15%SWEET DREAM IN A BAG: $2k → 3%PUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC: $100 → 8%NEW HAMPSHIRE CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $3k → 7%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS & ITS CONSTITUENT CHAPTERS & BRANCHES: $2k → 14%SOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY: $2k → 8%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $1k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 27 repeat orgs$961k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 36 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
55

Total granted

$3.5M
$562k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+39%

Still filing today

70%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $399k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterAnimalsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $724k · revenue +54%
  • DA
    DENVER ACADEMY INC
    4× · 2019–2024 · $600k · revenue +38%
  • SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $375k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • DP
    DENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2017 · $261k
  • SD
    San Diego Unified School District
    one grant, 2021 · $140k
  • CS
    COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Stem Advantage

Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…

Youth Development
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
5
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
6
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
7
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
8
University of Denver

The university of denver (du) is a higher educational institution, providing both undergraduate and graduate degrees - the mission of the university of denver is to promote learning by engaging with students (continued on schedule o)in…

Education
9
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
10
American Society of Civil Engineers Inc

To provide essential value to our members, their careers, our partners, and the public, asce will: facilitate the advancement of technology; encourage and provide the tools for lifelong learning; promote professionalism and the profession;…

Science & Tech
11
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
12
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is East High School Rugby Football Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 118 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
61/62
Grantees still filing
40/62
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $1,200,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATIONCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $723,685 · EducationCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONDENVER ACADEMY INC: $599,803 · EducationDENVER ACADEMY INCSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $375,000 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY+9 more: $41,129 · EducationDENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $261,000 · OtherDENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLSATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $177,538 · OtherATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLSST JOSEPH CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $163,269 · OtherST JOSEPH CATHOLIC SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $156,548 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF COLORADOSan Diego Unified School District: $140,387 · OtherSan Diego Unified School DistrictCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY: $113,689 · OtherCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITYSTADIUM MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC: $100,000 · OtherSTADIUM MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC+69 more: $263,538 · Other+69 moreDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Animals+2 more: $300 · AnimalsBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $9,000 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $7,628 · HealthTHE GABBY KRAUSE FOUNDATION: $7,000 · HealthMAX S LOVE PROJECT INC: $5,000 · HealthWhite Memorial Med Cntr Charitable Fdtn Adventist Health White Memorial Ch Fdtn: $5,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,150 · Health+4 more: $2,200 · HealthENERGY COORDINATING AGENCY OF PHILADELPHIA INC: $8,000 · Housing & ShelterThe Resurrection Project: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY: $3,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $400 · Housing & ShelterEAST HIGH SCHOOL RUGBY FOOTBALL CLUB: $9,687 · Recreation & SportsMIRACLES FOR KIDS INC: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsFort Lowell Soccer Club Inc: $3,000 · Recreation & SportsNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $2,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,100 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesA KID'S PLACE OF TAMPA BAY INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesSWEET DREAM IN A BAG INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesTHE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $1,500 · Human ServicesTOGETHER FRIENDS ORGANIZATION INC: $1,000 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human Services
Education$2,939,617Other$1,375,969Animals$50,300Health$37,978Housing & Shelter$18,900Recreation & Sports$18,687Human Services$14,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $1,200,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $723,685 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDENVER ACADEMY INC: $599,803 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $375,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $10,158 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLORADO EDUCATION INITIATIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIDWEST ENERGY ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEAST HIGH SCHOOL RUGBY FOOTBALL CLUB: $9,687 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSoroptimist International of Rio Vista: $8,700 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetENERGY COORDINATING AGENCY OF PHILADELPHIA INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $7,628 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Resurrection Project: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GABBY KRAUSE FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCollege is Real Inc: $6,900 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetUTAH STEM FOUNDATION INC: $6,569 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMIRACLES FOR KIDS INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREALITY CHANGERS: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMAX S LOVE PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFuture Construction Leaders Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetWhite Memorial Med Cntr Charitable Fdtn Adventist Health White Memorial Ch Fdtn: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF DENVER INC: $4,650 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMathPath: $4,550 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUniversity of California Merced Foundation: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION: $3,742 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFort Lowell Soccer Club Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ORANGE COAST: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPIPE LINERS CLUB OF TULSA: $2,750 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS DREAM CODE: $2,060 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAY AREA CRISIS NURSERY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetA KID'S PLACE OF TAMPA BAY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER NASHUA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1,890 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $1,715 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $1,515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIND LIKE JOEY FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetSWEET DREAM IN A BAG INC: $1,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMIT ACADEMY OIC: $1,092 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Society of Black Engineers Boston Professionals: $1,066 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE COLORADO EDUCATION INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST ENERGY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds EAST HIGH SCHOOL RUGBY FOOTBALL CLUB ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Soroptimist International of Rio Vista ↗
  • Who funds ENERGY COORDINATING AGENCY OF PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds The Resurrection Project ↗
  • Who funds THE GABBY KRAUSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds College is Real Inc ↗
  • Who funds UTAH STEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLES FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds REALITY CHANGERS ↗
  • Who funds MAX S LOVE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Future Construction Leaders Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Xcel Energy FoundationMN15.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Xcel Energy Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · Mile High United Way Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · California Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Campos Epc Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Campos Epc Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Campos Epc Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Campos Epc Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 118 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Campos Epc’s filings →

More from the funding graph