Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Union Pacific Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$8.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
441
Grants FY2025still arriving
26
States reached
$600k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Education$12MArts & Culture$11MHealth$6.4MCommunity Improvement$5.0MHuman Services$4.2MRecreation & Sports$3.9MPhilanthropy$3.6MYouth Development$3.6MOther$0
02FY2025 · 441 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k192 grants · $1.0M
  • $10k–50k238 grants · $3.0M
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
  • $250k+9 grants · $4.0M
$10,000
Median grant
26
States reached
$75k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST (DBA KIEWIT LUMINARIUM)$600,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION$500,000
COMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST$500,000
MENTAL HEALTH INNOVATION FOUNDATION$500,000
DOWNTOWN RIVERFRONT TRUST$500,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION$400,000
OMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION$335,000
UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS$325,000
JOSLYN ART MUSEUM$300,000
FOODBANK FOR THE HEARTLAND$100,000
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS - OMAHA$50,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY$35,000
THE HOUSTON FOOD BANK$30,000
EUGENE PARKS FOUNDATION$30,000
PORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $3.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PAJARO VALLEY SHELTER SERVICES: $20k → 13%SISKIYOU COMMUNITY RESOURCE COLLABORATIVE: $20k → 16%EUGENE FAMILY YMCA: $21k → 15%UPEC FRIEND TO FRIEND NETWORK: $25k → 15%CHARLES E LAKIN HUMAN SERVICES CAMPUS FOUNDATION: $50k → 12%TUCSON CENTER FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $20k → 15%REDEMPTION PROJECT: $20k → 11%CITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $25k → 16%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $40k → 9%HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $20k → 13%CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WEST ERN WASHINGTON: $25k → 9%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHICAGOLAND AND NORTHWEST INDIANA: $20k → 7%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHICAGOLAND AND NORTHWEST INDIANA: $20k → 7%COMMUNITY ACTION SOCIAL SERVICES & EDUCATION INC: $20k → 22%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $20k → 12%SENIORS FIRST INC: $20k → 6%BERKELEY FOOD AND HOUSING PROJECT: $20k → 10%SAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $20k → 12%CENTRO HISPANO: $20k → 8%DENVER INDIAN CENTER INC: $20k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND: $25k → 12%YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $25k → 14%YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $25k → 14%HELMET PEAK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT: $20k → 15%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 12%YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $20k → 14%COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEVADA: $20k → 13%WARREN VILLAGE INC: $20k → 12%CIRCLE THE CITY: $20k → 11%CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $35k → 16%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $20k → 14%URBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA INC: $25k → 12%SAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $20k → 12%BREAD OF LIFE: $50k → 16%BREAD OF LIFE: $20k → 16%DESERT MISSION INC: $20k → 11%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $50k → 12%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $25k → 12%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $25k → 12%MEET THE STREETS OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC: $20k → 16%BAKERRIPLEY: $20k → 16%URBAN INTIATIVES INC: $25k → 14%URBAN INTIATIVES INC: $20k → 14%INSTITUTE FOR LATINO PROGRESS: $20k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $250k → 14%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 12%SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $25k → 14%SPARK CAPITAL: $29k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
IN
OH
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$46M · 763 repeat orgs$14M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

763 repeat relationships — 229 still active in FY2025, 534 since wound down; 188 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

763
1023

Total granted

$46M
$12M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+10%

Still filing today

90%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $7.5M · revenue +31%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +60%
  • JA
    JOSLYN ART MUSEUM
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • VT
    VETERANS TRUST
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue -100%
  • OS
    OMAHA SHELTER FOR HOMELESS TRUST
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue -100%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue -13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
2
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
3
United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

Philanthropy
4
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
5
Lincoln Children's Museum

The lincoln children's museum invites children to create, discover and learn through the power of play.

Arts & Culture
6
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
7
Goodwill Industries of the Valley Works

Goodwill's mission is to empower individuals, strengthen families, and inspire communities through job skills training and work placement opportunities with a multi-generational approach focused on removing barriers.

Human Services
8
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
9
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
10
Cultivate Kansas City Inc

Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.

Food & Nutrition
11
United Way of Comal County

To engage the community and focus resources for those in need in comal county

Philanthropy
12
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opportunity Center for the Homeless and the most unlike its peers is Colfax Railroad Days Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAddiction Recovery ServicesCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Local History MuseumsCommunity Arts CentersChristian Missionary Organi…Developmental Disabilities …Independent K-12 SchoolsYouth Development CentersYouth Mentoring ProgramsSchool Parent OrganizationsChristian Youth CampsPregnancy Support ServicesFaith-Based Social ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Equine Therapy ProgramsJewish Community Organizati…Animal Rescue and ShelterElementary Literacy TutoringCommunity Food PantriesPolicy Research and AdvocacyMilitary Veterans SupportFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Cancer Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Affordable Housing Construc…School District FoundationsLgbtq+ Community SupportUnited Way AffiliatesDomestic Violence ServicesYmca Youth DevelopmentAffordable Housing Developm…Local Food System Organizat…Senior Support ServicesPublic Library OperationsYouth Development ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Food Banks and PantriesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Health Access Advocacy and …Community College Foundatio…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%3%<5yr14%24%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%21%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.7%15/2,044
the rest of the field
13%
240,381/1,817,521

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

1722 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1722 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

19
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
385
Early backer (in before they grew)
1681/1722
Grantees still filing
1019/1722
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $7,532,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATIONOMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST — $2,400,000 · EducationOMAHA DISCOVERY TRUSTUS Chamber of Commerce Foundation — $2,200,000 · EducationUS Chamber of Commerce FoundationCOMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST — $1,000,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST+18 more — $1,093,500 · Education+18 moreMENTAL HEALTH INNOVATION FOUNDATION — $2,000,000 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH …CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $1,510,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOS…SOUTHWEST IOWA NONPROFIT FOR COLLECTIVE IMPACT — $600,000 · HealthSOUTHWEST IOWA…+10 more — $522,000 · Health+10 moreOMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST (DBA KIEWIT LUMINARIUM) — $600,000 · OtherOMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST …OMAHA SHELTER FOR HOMELESS TRUST — $250,000 · OtherOMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION — $670,000 · OtherOMAHA ZOO FOUNDATIONSave The Children Federation Inc — $250,000 · Other+101 more — $5,433,484 · Other+101 moreDOWNTOWN RIVERFRONT TRUST — $3,000,000 · Community ImprovementDOWNTOWN R…+5 more — $225,000 · Community Improvement+5 moreJOSLYN ART MUSEUM — $1,545,000 · Arts & CultureOPAS FOUNDATION — $250,000 · Arts & Culture+19 more — $1,019,500 · Arts & CultureUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS — $1,985,000 · PhilanthropyVETERANS TRUST — $250,000 · PhilanthropyCOFFEYVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $112,000 · Philanthropy+8 more — $379,100 · PhilanthropyAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $435,000 · Human ServicesCLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING — $73,500 · Human ServicesBREAD OF LIFE INC — $70,000 · Human ServicesYWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $70,000 · Human ServicesURBAN INITIATIVES INC — $70,000 · Human ServicesKIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER — $60,000 · Human ServicesSAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE — $50,000 · Human ServicesCHARLES E LAKIN HUMAN SERVICES CAMPUS FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Human ServicesYWCA OF CLINTON IOWA — $50,000 · Human ServicesRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHICAGOLAND & NW INDIANA — $50,000 · Human ServicesBakerRipley — $49,000 · Human Services+11 more — $432,000 · Human Services
Education$14,225,500Health$4,632,000Other$7,203,484Community Improvement$3,225,000Arts & Culture$2,814,500Philanthropy$2,726,100Human Services$1,459,500

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $7,532,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetDOWNTOWN RIVERFRONT TRUST — $3,000,000 over 6y, 56% of budgetOMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST — $2,400,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetUS Chamber of Commerce Foundation — $2,200,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH INNOVATION FOUNDATION — $2,000,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS — $1,985,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetJOSLYN ART MUSEUM — $1,545,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $1,510,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST — $1,000,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetOMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION — $670,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetSOUTHWEST IOWA NONPROFIT FOR COLLECTIVE IMPACT — $600,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $435,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS TRUST — $250,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetOPAS FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetOMAHA SHELTER FOR HOMELESS TRUST — $250,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMABAS FOUNDATION — $185,500 over 4y, 18% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND — $144,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GEORGE AND BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION — $130,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCOFFEYVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $112,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetMID-PLAINS UNITED WAY INC — $105,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetCOLUMBIA BASIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $92,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetMaywood Fine Arts Association — $90,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetSER-JOBS FOR PROGRESS OF THE TEXAS GULF COAST INC — $90,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetSanta Teresa Charitable Foundation — $90,000 over 5y, 22% of budgetDowntown Streets Inc — $90,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSt Luke's Health Foundation Ltd — $87,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetKOHL CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF GREATER CHICAGO INC — $85,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetPOTTAWATTAMIE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetLOOKING FOR LINCOLN HERITAGE COALITION — $78,500 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetLINCOLN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS INC — $75,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetCOLUMBUS AREA CHILDRENS MUSEUM INC — $75,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetTHE LIVING PLANET INC — $73,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING — $73,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCHICAGO CARES INC — $73,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetIOWA JOBS FOR AMERICA'S GRADUATES INC — $72,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetOREGON MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY — $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBREAD OF LIFE INC — $70,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetYWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN INITIATIVES INC — $70,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBig Shoulders Fund — $70,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSEVENTY-FIVE NORTH REVITALIZATION CORPORATION — $69,433 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHISTORIC PULLMAN FOUNDATION DBA FRIENDS OF PULLMAN — $68,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetPaz De Cristo Community Center — $67,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetColorado Association of Black Professional Engineers & Scientists — $65,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES — $65,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJANE ADDAMS RESOURCE CORPORATION — $65,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Peter Kiewit Foundati…Robert B Daugherty Fo…Mutual of Omaha Found…The Lozier FoundationWeitz Family Foundati…The Sherwood Foundati…The Hawks FoundationThe Charles and Mary …Gilbert M and Martha …United Way of the Mid…The Holland FoundationSuzanne & Walter Scot…
Peter Kiewit FoundationNE85.1× affinity72 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Peter Kiewit Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Gilbert M and Martha H Hitchcock Foundation · United Way of the Midlands · The Holland Foundation · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Union Pacific Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 27%
  • Willamette Riverkeeper — 42% of income from government
  • Urban League of Portland Inc — 33% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Neighbors Building Neighborhoods Inc — 27% of income from government
  • The Arts Council of Pendleton Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Portland Community College Foundation Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Oregon Museum of Science and Industry — 4% of income from government
  • Portland Baroque Orchestra — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
87report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines