Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$439k
Granted FY2024still arriving
39
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Arts & Culture$897kEducation$674kFood & Nutrition$443kEnvironment$291kCommunity Improvement$234kHuman Services$204kCivil Rights$185kYouth Development$132kOther$0
02FY2024 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k30 grants · $398k
$10,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAKOTA WALDORF SCHOOL AKA WOLAKOTA WALDORF SOCIETY$20,653
PINE RIDGE GIRLS SCHOOL INC$20,000
FOUR BRIDGES TRAVELING PERMACULTURE INSTITUTE$20,000
FUNDAMENTAL NEEDS INC$20,000
WINONA-DAKOTA UNITY ALLIANCE$20,000
ALL RELATIONS UNITED$20,000
GALLINA RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR INDIGENOUS TECHNOLOGY$18,500
SOUTHERN COLORADO COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY - YOUTH SERVICES$15,000
FAST BLACKFEET$15,000
OCETI WAKAN - SACRED FIREPLACE$15,000
AKIING 8TH FIRE$15,000
IMPACT (FISCAL AGENT FOR TURTLE MOUNTAIN IMPACT EMPOWERMENT SELF DEFENSE)$15,000
CODE GIRLS UNITED$13,000
A STUDIO IN THE WOODS$10,500
GRID ALTERNATIVES SAN DIEGO$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $263k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOPI TUTSKWA PERMACULTURE INSTITUTE INC: $20k → 26%MENDOTA MDEWAKANTON DAKOTA TRIBAL COMMUNITY: $10k → 6%DAKOTA WICOHAN: $10k → 11%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $10k → 14%COVENANT PATHWAYS: $10k → 32%EKUNV YEFOLECULKE: $20k → 18%AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES: $5k → 8%DENVER INDIAN FAMILY RESOUCE CENTER: $15k → 12%AMERICAN INDIAN COMMUNITY CENTER ASSOC: $4k → 12%RUNNING STRONG FOR AMERICAN INDIAN YOUTH: $17k → 6%HOPI TUTSKWA PERMACULTURE INSTITUTE: $16k → 26%DAKOTA WICOHAN: $7k → 11%TIDES CENTER: $10k → 10%COVENANT PATHWAYS: $10k → 32%EKVN-YEFOLECV: $20k → 18%RUNNING STRONG FOR AMERICAN INDIAN YOUTH: $10k → 6%FREEDOM LODGE: $5k → 14%BRAVE HEART SOCIETY: $10k → 22%Hopi Tutskwa Permaculture Institute: $10k → 26%COVENANT PATHWAYS: $5k → 32%EKVNV YEFOLECVLKE: $10k → 18%FOUR WINDS AMERICAN INDIAN COUNCIL: $5k → 12%HOPI TUTSKAWA PERMACULTURE INSTITUTE: $10k → 26%Covenant Pathways: $10k → 32%DIVISION OF INDIAN WORK: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
WA
ID
MT
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
SD
IN
CA
UT
CO
NE
VA
MD
AZ
NM
NC
HI
OK
LA
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.2M · 55 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

55 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 41 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
75

Total granted

$2.2M
$902k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+13%

Still filing today

78%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $244k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND
    5× · 2017–2021 · $270k · revenue +198%
  • FB
    FOUR BRIDGES TRAVELING PERMACULTURE INSTITUTE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $112k · revenue +87% · 35% of their budget
  • WW
    WOLAKOTA WALDORF SOCIETY
    4× · 2017–2023 · $92k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • HC
    HUICHOL CENTER FOR CULTURAL SURVIVAL AND TRADITIONAL ARTS
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue -62%
  • PY
    PASCUA YAQUI TRIBE
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • SC
    SOUTHERN COLORADO COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY (SOCOCAA)
    one grant, 2022 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Indian Institute

The american indian institute's mission is to perpetuate the ancient wisdom and cultural heritage of north america's native people and to promote a greater understanding of that wisdom amoung all people.

Human Services
2
Indigenous Women Rising Indigeous Women Rising
—
3
The Foundation for Indigenous Education Leadership Development
Education
4
International Indigenous Fund for Development and Solidarity Batani
International
5
Native American Agriculture Fund
Food & Nutrition
6
The Indigenous Knowledge Collective

The Indigenous Knowledge Collective is a 501c3 nonprofit organization that serves people in New Mexico and Arizona in a Native lead environment to sustain the revitalization of traditional existence of Native People through Art Lessons,…

—
7
Ratiwennahawi Inc

Fund Indigenous Nations Languate, Culture and Restoration Plans

Education
8
Native American Fiber Program
Environment
9
Painted Sky Inc
Arts & Culture
10
The Tiwahe Foundation

Our mission is to strengthen indigenous leadership and cultural identity.

Human Services
11
Alnobaiwi
Arts & Culture
12
Native Healing Llc
Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indian Country Grassroots Support and the most unlike its peers is All Relations United. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts CentersLocal History MuseumsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Youth Mentoring ProgramsSchool District FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Community College Foundatio…Local Food System Organizat…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%11%<5yr14%21%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%6%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%7%<5yr14%18%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%3%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%3/119
the rest of the field
13%
240,393/1,819,446

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

107 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 107 of the 156 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
36
Early backer (in before they grew)
100/107
Grantees still filing
66/107
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WOLAKOTA WALDORF SOCIETY — $92,000 · OtherWOLAKOTA WALDORF SOCIETYONABEN — $77,500 · OtherONABENLAKOTA WALDORF SCHOOL (Walakota Waldorf Society) — $65,700 · OtherOCETI WAKAN (SACRED FIREPLACE) — $65,000 · OtherOWEAKU INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE PROJECT — $57,000 · OtherCHEYENNE RIVER YOUTH PROJECT INC — $57,000 · Other+73 more — $994,093 · Other+73 moreALL RELATIONS UNITED — $95,000 · Arts & CultureALL RELATIONS UNITEDKOAHNIC BROADCAST CORPORATION — $83,500 · Arts & CultureKOAHNIC BROADCAST CORPOR…THE LANGUAGE CONSERVANCY INC — $52,120 · Arts & CultureTHE LANGUAGE CONSERVANCY…MANIDOO OGITIGAAN — $47,000 · Arts & CultureMANIDOO OGITIGAANLAKOTA LANGUAGE CONSORTIUM INC — $32,500 · Arts & CultureHUICHOL CENTER FOR CULTURAL SURVIVAL AND TRADITIONAL ARTS — $30,000 · Arts & CultureNew Mexico Film Foundation — $27,000 · Arts & CultureBlue Bird LifeWays — $25,000 · Arts & Culture+26 more — $328,290 · Arts & Culture+26 moreAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND — $270,000 · EducationAMERICAN INDIAN C…PINE RIDGE GIRLS SCHOOL INC — $60,000 · EducationPINE RIDGE GIRLS …AKIING 8TH FIRE — $45,000 · EducationAKIING 8TH FIREWINONA-DAKOTA UNITY ALLIANCE — $35,000 · EducationWINONA-DAKOTA UNI…BEMIDJI STATE UNIVERSITY ALUMNI AND FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Education+7 more — $78,000 · Education+7 moreHOPI TUTSKWA PERMACULTURE INSTITUTE — $55,500 · Human ServicesHOPI TUTS…EKVNV YEFOLECVLKE — $50,000 · Human ServicesEKVNV YEF…AMERICAN INDIAN YOUTH RUNNING STRONG INC — $37,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN …COVENANT PATHWAYS — $35,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT …DAKOTA WICOHAN — $17,000 · Human ServicesDAKOTA WI…DENVER INDIAN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER — $15,000 · Human ServicesDENVER IN…TIDES CENTER — $10,000 · Human ServicesPartnership With Native Americans — $10,000 · Human ServicesSEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesMENDOTA MDEWAKANTON DAKOTA TRIBAL COUNCIL — $10,000 · Human Services+6 more — $28,500 · Human Services+6 moreNative American food sovereignty alliance dba NAFSA — $45,000 · Community ImprovementTaos County Economic Development Corp — $35,000 · Community ImprovementTOLANI LAKE ENTERPRISES INC — $27,000 · Community ImprovementTEXAS TRIBAL BUFFALO PROJECT — $25,000 · Community ImprovementGEDAKINA INC — $20,000 · Community ImprovementNORTHWEST NATIVE CHAMBER — $15,000 · Community ImprovementWESTERN ORGANIZATION OF RESOURCE COUNCILS EDUCATION PROJECT — $10,000 · Community ImprovementIMPACT INC — $10,000 · Community ImprovementINDIAN COUNTRY GRASSROOTS SUPPORT — $7,000 · Community Improvement+1 more — $5,000 · Community ImprovementFundamental Needs Inc — $67,500 · Food & NutritionANISHINAABE AGRICULTURE INSTITUTE — $54,000 · Food & NutritionFAST BLACKFEET — $15,000 · Food & NutritionWHITE EARTH LAND RECOVERY PROJECT — $15,000 · Food & NutritionFOUR BRIDGES TRAVELING PERMACULTURE INSTITUTE — $112,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,408,293Arts & Culture$720,410Education$508,000Human Services$278,000Community Improvement$199,000Food & Nutrition$151,500Philanthropy$112,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND — $270,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFOUR BRIDGES TRAVELING PERMACULTURE INSTITUTE — $112,000 over 8y, 35% of budgetWOLAKOTA WALDORF SOCIETY — $92,000 over 4y, 8.9% of budgetKOAHNIC BROADCAST CORPORATION — $83,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetONABEN — $77,500 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetFundamental Needs Inc — $67,500 over 3y, 19% of budgetOCETI WAKAN (SACRED FIREPLACE) — $65,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetPINE RIDGE GIRLS SCHOOL INC — $60,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetCHEYENNE RIVER YOUTH PROJECT INC — $57,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetHOPI TUTSKWA PERMACULTURE INSTITUTE — $55,500 over 4y, 9.0% of budgetANISHINAABE AGRICULTURE INSTITUTE — $54,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetTHE LANGUAGE CONSERVANCY INC — $52,120 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetEKVNV YEFOLECVLKE — $50,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMANIDOO OGITIGAAN — $47,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetAKIING 8TH FIRE — $45,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetNative American food sovereignty alliance dba NAFSA — $45,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN YOUTH RUNNING STRONG INC — $37,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetDream of Wild Health — $37,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetTaos County Economic Development Corp — $35,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetCOVENANT PATHWAYS — $35,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetWINONA-DAKOTA UNITY ALLIANCE — $35,000 over 3y, 10.0% of budgetLAKOTA LANGUAGE CONSORTIUM INC — $32,500 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetHUICHOL CENTER FOR CULTURAL SURVIVAL AND TRADITIONAL ARTS — $30,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetTOLANI LAKE ENTERPRISES INC — $27,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetNew Mexico Film Foundation — $27,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetBlue Bird LifeWays — $25,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetTEXAS TRIBAL BUFFALO PROJECT — $25,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetCENTER OF SOUTHWEST CULTURE INC — $24,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetHAMPTONS COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC — $23,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCONSERVATION LEGACY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALBUQUERQUE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING SOCIETY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBEMIDJI STATE UNIVERSITY ALUMNI AND FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGLOBAL PEACE TRAIN — $20,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetWAUB AJIJAAK PRESS & FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetInternational Indian Treaty Council Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetGEDAKINA INC — $20,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCROW LANGUAGE CONSORTIUM INC — $19,500 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetTREES WATER AND PEOPLE — $19,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetKAYENTA ARTS FOUNDATION — $17,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetDAKOTA WICOHAN — $17,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetSTOKES COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL INC — $15,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetFAST BLACKFEET — $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDENVER INDIAN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER — $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNORTHWEST NATIVE CHAMBER — $15,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTraverse Area Historical Society — $15,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetINDIGENOUS PERFORMANCE PRODUCTIONS — $15,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetLOWER BRULE COMMUNITY COLLEGE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Nations Develop…Common Counsel Founda…Seventh Generation Fu…Ndn Collective IncNovo FoundationMarshall L and Perrin…Amalgamated Charitabl…Santa Fe Community Fo…The Annenberg Foundat…Rsf Social Finance IncThe Minneapolis Found…Northwest Area Founda…
First Nations Development InstituteCO55.9× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Nations Development Institute · Common Counsel Foundation · Seventh Generation Fund for Indigenous Peoples Inc · Ndn Collective Inc · Novo Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Santa Fe Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · The Minneapolis Foundation · Northwest Area Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 25%
  • Impact Inc — 25% of income from government
  • Holistic Life Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 156 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home