Skip to content
Seventh Generation Fund for Indigenous Peoples Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Seventh Generation Fund for Indigenous Peoples Inc

Support of indigenous people's programs

$3.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$2.6MArts & Culture$2.3MEnvironment$2.0MCommunity Improvement$1.5MCivil Rights$1.3MHealth$747kYouth Development$700kFood & Nutrition$698kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $790,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,500,448 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,710,448 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $650k
$50,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$32M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUK DUK GOOSE INC$150,000
NORTHERN CHEYENNE FOOD PANTRY$100,000
BEAUCHAMP KITCHEN$50,000
CROW LANGUAGE CONSORTIUM$50,000
EUCHEE YUCHI LANGUAGE PROJECT$50,000
FORT BELKNAP ELDERS HELPING ELDERS$50,000
INSTITUTE OF NATIVE KNOWLEDGE$50,000
EKVN-YEFOLECV$50,000
IGIUGIG VILLAGE COUNCIL$50,000
OAYE LUTA OKOLAKICIYE$50,000
BLUE CREEK AH PAH VILLAGE$30,000
CIHUAPACTLI COLLECTIVE$30,000
WACIYANPI$30,000
YELLOWSTONE PEOPLES$20,000
CANTE WAUNSILIPI WI TA OMINICIYE$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SEEDS OF HARMONY INC: $35k → 28%THE NORTHEAST NATIVE NETWORK OF KINSHIP AND HEALING INC: $33k → 8%NEBRASKA INDIAN CHILD WELFARE COALITION INC: $20k → 16%DAKOTA WICOHAN - WIKOSKA & WICIYENA GIRLS LEADERSHIP PROGRAM: $50k → 11%SNQWEYIMISTN: $25k → 18%CENTER POLE: $20k → 23%AMERICAN INDIAN CHILD RESOURCE CENTER: $50k → 9%TARAHAT WOMEN'S CEREMONIAL SOCIETY: $25k → 14%THREE SISTERS COLLECTIVE: $50k → 12%EKVN-YEFOLECV: $50k → 18%MOWA BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS: $20k → 19%YAKUTAT TLINGIT TRIBE: $50k → 12%MANIILAQ FAMILY CRISIS CENTERWOMEN'S CENTER: $50k → 20%RAMAPOUGH CULTURE AND LAND FOUNDATION: $30k → 6%SACRED PIPE RESOURCE CENTER: $35k → 10%IAMLEGACY: $50k → 8%NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY BOARD INC: $40k → 22%CENTER POLE: $20k → 23%NATIVE DADS NETWORK: $50k → 12%KNO'QOTI NATIVE WELLNESS: $20k → 17%EKVN-YEFOLECV: $50k → 18%Maniilaq Association: $36k → 20%SACRED PIPE RESOURCE CENTER: $30k → 10%BRAVE HEART SOCIETY: $30k → 22%WILD HORSE BUTTE CDC: $30k → 31%NATIONAL INDIGENOUS WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $35k → 18%NATIVE DADS NETWORK: $30k → 12%SAAD K'IDILYE: $30k → 14%EKVN-YEFOLECV: $25k → 18%XKKF (XAADAS KIL KUYAAS FOUNDATION): $50k → 15%YUP'IK WOMEN'S COALITION: $50k → 30%wild horse butte community development: $20k → 31%KNIFE CHIEF BUFFALO NATION SOCIETY: $30k → 42%NATIVE DADS NETWORK: $30k → 12%UNITED NATIONS PERMANENT FORUM ON INDIGENOUS ISSUES: $39k → 17%EKVN-YEFOLECV: $22k → 18%CHUGACHMIUT: $50k → 10%Yup'ik Women's Coalition: $50k → 30%Chugachmiut: $25k → 10%OGLALA LAKOTA CHILDREN'S JUSTICE CENTER: $40k → 42%YUP'IK WOMEN'S COALITION (YWC): $50k → 30%HOPI-TEWA WOMEN'S COALITION TO END ABUSE: $30k → 26%YUPIK WOMEN'S COALITION: $50k → 30%OGLALA LAKOTA CHILDREN'S JUSTICE CENTER: $30k → 42%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $100k → 12%SOVEREIGN BODIES INSTITUTE: $30k → 18%TWO FEATHERS NATIVE AMERICAN SERVICES: $25k → 18%AFFILIATE WINGS - CENTRO DEL PUEBLO: $69k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
NE
VA
MD
AZ
NM
NC
DC
HI
OK
LA
AL
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $1.5M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$1.4M · 91% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: PROGRAM ASSISTANCE

South America$50k · 3% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PROGRAM ASSISTANCE

East Asia and the Pacific$50k · 3% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PROGRAM ASSISTANCE

South Asia$30k · 2% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PROGRAM ASSISTANCE

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.8M · 108 repeat orgs$5.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

108 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 101 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

108
184

Total granted

$8.8M
$4.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+21%

Still filing today

75%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $380k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SG
    SEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC
    3× · 2019–2024 · $313k · revenue +8%
  • NM
    NATIVE MOVEMENT
    4× · 2017–2022 · $223k · revenue ×12
  • YW
    YUPIK WOMEN'S COALITION
    4× · 2017–2023 · $200k · revenue +25% · 28% of their budget

Funded once

  • IS
    INQUIRING SYSTEMS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $241k · revenue +49%
  • CD
    CENTRO DEL PUEBLO MOVIMIENTO INDIGENA MIGRANTEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $89k · revenue +192% · 30% of their budget
  • GI
    GEDAKINA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $65k · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indigenous Women Rising Indigeous Women Rising
—
2
Native Healing Llc
Animals
3
American Indian Institute

The american indian institute's mission is to perpetuate the ancient wisdom and cultural heritage of north america's native people and to promote a greater understanding of that wisdom amoung all people.

Human Services
4
Ratiwennahawi Inc

Fund Indigenous Nations Languate, Culture and Restoration Plans

Education
5
International Indigenous Fund for Development and Solidarity Batani
International
6
Womanshare Legacy

Womanshare Legacy is an educational, financial and cultural resource for women who may be facing challenges because of discrimination, lack of opportunities or scarcity of personal support. Womanshare Legacy works locally with women,…

Human Services
7
The Foundation for Indigenous Education Leadership Development
Education
8
Naa Kaani Native Program

The naa kaani native program strives to educate and empower native communities in the pacific norhtwest, with a focus on the salish sea territory. we support cultural events, advocate for tribal rights, and aim to improve lives and…

Community Improvement
9
Native American Fiber Program
Environment
10
The Cultural ConservancySacred Land Foundation

We are a Native-led Indigenous rights organization. We are dedicated to our mission of protecting & revitalizing Indigenous cultures, empowering them in the direct application of their traditional knowledge & practices on their ancestral…

Arts & Culture
11
Tataviam Land Conservancy

To restore the unceded ancestral homelands of the FTBMI by implementing protective land management strategies, traditional ecological knowledge, and climate-resilient initiatives. By holding lands in perpetuity, TLC works to prevent the…

Environment
12
Native American Advocacy Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Native Conservancy; the most unlike its peers is Yoyot Spqni. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

219 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 219 of the 307 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

19
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
83
Early backer (in before they grew)
205/219
Grantees still filing
145/219
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DUK DUK GOOSE: $355,000 · OtherDUK DUK GOOSEEMMONAK WOMEN'S SHELTER: $200,000 · OtherUnited Tribes of Bristol Bay: $190,000 · Other+81 more: $4,281,023 · Other+81 moreSEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC: $313,208 · Human ServicesSEVENTH GENERATION FU…YUPIK WOMEN'S COALITION: $200,000 · Human ServicesYUPIK WOMEN'S COALITI…EKVNV YEFOLECVLKE: $169,000 · Human ServicesEKVNV YEFOLECVLKEALASKA WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $150,000 · Human ServicesALASKA WOMENS RESOURC…NATIVE DADS NETWORK INC: $135,000 · Human ServicesNATIVE DADS NETWORK I…TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $110,000 · Human ServicesCENTRO DEL PUEBLO MOVIMIENTO INDIGENA MIGRANTE: $88,760 · Human ServicesManiilaq Association: $86,000 · Human Services+26 more: $1,157,924 · Human Services+26 moreCihuapactli Collective: $180,000 · Arts & CultureCihuapactli Co…Jilkaat Kwaan Heritage Center: $150,000 · Arts & CultureJilkaat Kwaan …EUCHEE YUCHI LANGUAGE PROJECT INC: $136,200 · Arts & CultureEUCHEE YUCHI L…Blue Bird LifeWays: $125,000 · Arts & CultureBlue Bird Life…Native Peoples Action Community Fund: $100,000 · Arts & CultureNative Peoples…INDIGENOUS LIFEWAYS: $95,000 · Arts & CultureINDIGENOUS LIF…CALIFORNIA INDIAN BASKETWEAVERS ASSOCIATION: $85,000 · Arts & CultureFIRST PEOPLES FUND: $65,000 · Arts & CultureWHYHUNGER INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureMIWOK HERITAGE CENTER: $60,000 · Arts & Culture+16 more: $662,198 · Arts & Culture+16 moreINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC: $241,010 · Community ImprovementINQUIRING SY…NATIVE MOVEMENT: $223,000 · Community ImprovementNATIVE MOVEM…RURAL ALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $150,000 · Community ImprovementRURAL ALASKA…ALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLANDS ASSOCIATION INC: $140,000 · Community ImprovementALEUTIAN PRI…TEXAS TRIBAL BUFFALO PROJECT: $120,000 · Community ImprovementTEXAS TRIBAL…IMPACT INC: $105,000 · Community ImprovementIMPACT INCFIRST ALASKANS INSTITUTE: $70,000 · Community ImprovementGEDAKINA INC: $65,000 · Community ImprovementAJO CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE: $50,000 · Community ImprovementCOHARIE INTRA-TRIBAL COUNCIL INC: $50,000 · Community Improvement+6 more: $173,000 · Community Improvement+6 moreNEW VENTURE FUND: $175,000 · EnvironmentNEW VENTU…SITKA CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $150,000 · EnvironmentSITKA CON…SOGOREA TE LAND TRUST: $110,000 · EnvironmentSOGOREA T…Cultural Fire Management Council: $100,000 · EnvironmentCultural …NATIVE CONSERVANCY: $85,000 · EnvironmentNATIVE CO…KAHEA THE HAWAIIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ALLIANCE: $60,000 · EnvironmentKAHEA THE…WHITESWAN ENVIRONMENTAL WE: $55,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTALISM THROUGH INSPIRATION & NONVIOLENT ACTION: $50,000 · EnvironmentFIRST PEOPLE'S CONSERVATION COUNCIL: $50,000 · EnvironmentUNKITAWA: $45,000 · EnvironmentRios to Rivers: $40,000 · Environment+6 more: $167,000 · Environment+6 moreOAYE LUTA OKOLAKICIYE: $160,000 · HealthHEALING NATIVE HEARTS COALITION: $150,000 · HealthMESSENGERS FOR HEALTH: $136,000 · HealthURBAN INDIGENOUS COLLECTIVE INC: $90,000 · HealthCalifornia Indian Environmental Alliance: $87,000 · HealthHIPEEXNU KII U NUUN WISIIX: $54,000 · Health+4 more: $97,500 · HealthUNITING RESILIENCE: $75,000 · EducationSalish School of Spokane: $75,000 · EducationSPIRET FOUNDATION: $55,000 · EducationBLACKFEET COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $50,000 · EducationXKKF: $50,000 · EducationKumeyaay Community College Inc: $50,000 · EducationRESOURCES FOR INDIAN STUDENT EDUCATION: $50,000 · EducationABIINOOJI-AKI INC CULTURAL HEALING CENTER: $40,000 · EducationRogue Climate: $31,977 · EducationTONATIERRA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $30,144 · EducationIndigenous Peoples Power Project Inc: $30,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE AKWESASNE FREEDOM SCHOOL INC: $26,000 · EducationASSOCIATION OF INTERIOR NATIVE EDUCATORS: $24,000 · Education
Other$5,026,023Human Services$2,409,892Arts & Culture$1,718,398Community Improvement$1,387,010Environment$1,087,000Health$774,500Education$587,121

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC: $313,208 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC: $241,010 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetNATIVE MOVEMENT: $223,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetYUPIK WOMEN'S COALITION: $200,000 over 4y, 28% of budgetEMMONAK WOMEN'S SHELTER: $200,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetCihuapactli Collective: $180,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $175,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEKVNV YEFOLECVLKE: $169,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetOAYE LUTA OKOLAKICIYE: $160,000 over 4y, 9.8% of budgetData for Indigenous Justice: $155,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetRURAL ALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $150,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetALASKA WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $150,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetAWARE Inc: $150,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetSITKA CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $150,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetJilkaat Kwaan Heritage Center: $150,000 over 4y, 35% of budgetHEALING NATIVE HEARTS COALITION: $150,000 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLANDS ASSOCIATION INC: $140,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEUCHEE YUCHI LANGUAGE PROJECT INC: $136,200 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetMESSENGERS FOR HEALTH: $136,000 over 4y, 34% of budgetNATIVE DADS NETWORK INC: $135,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetBlue Bird LifeWays: $125,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetTEXAS TRIBAL BUFFALO PROJECT: $120,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetSOGOREA TE LAND TRUST: $110,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTEWA WOMEN UNITED: $110,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetIMPACT INC: $105,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetREMATRIATION INC: $100,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetNative Peoples Action Community Fund: $100,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetINDIGENOUS WORLD ORGANIZATION: $100,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetCultural Fire Management Council: $100,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetNORTHERN CHEYENNE FOOD PANTRY: $100,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetINDIGENOUS LIFEWAYS: $95,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetURBAN INDIGENOUS COLLECTIVE INC: $90,000 over 2y, 75% of budgetPIEGAN INSTITUTE: $90,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetCENTRO DEL PUEBLO MOVIMIENTO INDIGENA MIGRANTE: $88,760 over 1y, 30% of budgetHaudonosaunee Coalition for Womens Inc: $87,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetCalifornia Indian Environmental Alliance: $87,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetManiilaq Association: $86,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE CONSERVANCY: $85,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA INDIAN BASKETWEAVERS ASSOCIATION: $85,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN CHEYENNE NATION: $80,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUNITING RESILIENCE: $75,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetCHUGACHMIUT: $75,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSalish School of Spokane: $75,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetSOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT: $71,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetWILD HORSE BUTTE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $70,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetOglala Lakota Childrens Justice Center Inc: $70,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetFIRST ALASKANS INSTITUTE: $70,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ndn Collective IncFirst Nations Develop…Common Counsel Founda…Novo FoundationSanta Fe Natural Toba…Amalgamated Charitabl…The Schmidt Family Fo…Rsf Social Finance IncPotlatch FundHumboldt Area Foundat…Northwest Area Founda…Na'ah Illahee Fund
Ndn Collective IncSD141× affinity78 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ndn Collective Inc · First Nations Development Institute · Common Counsel Foundation · Novo Foundation · Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Potlatch Fund · Humboldt Area Foundation · Northwest Area Foundation · Na'ah Illahee Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Seventh Generation Fund for Indigenous Peoples Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Seventh Generation Fund for Indigenous Peoples Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 43%
  • Northeast Native Network of Kinship and: 44% of income from government
  • Maquam Bay of Missisquoi Inc: 43% of income from government
  • Impact Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Rogue Climate: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
38report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Seventh Generation Fund for Indigenous Peoples Inc?

Find your warmest path to Seventh Generation Fund for Indigenous Peoples Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 307 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Seventh Generation Fund for Indigenous Peoples’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home