· Private foundation
Scott Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 58% of SCOTT FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k38 grants · $174k
- $10k–50k78 grants · $1.9M
- $50k–250k34 grants · $2.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL WESTMOELANDFAYETTE | $199,950 |
| QUEEN OF ANGELS CATHOLIC SCHOOL | $159,368 |
| POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE OF NORTH HUNTINGDON | $150,000 |
| FAYETTE CO COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC | $150,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE ALLEGHENIES | $125,000 |
| LIGONIER VOLUNTEER HOSE COMPANY #1 | $120,000 |
| CITY OF ERIE | $100,000 |
| DEER LAKES SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION | $100,000 |
| FAMILY HOUSE INC | $100,000 |
| WESTMORELAND HOMESTEAD VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT | $100,000 |
| JEFFERSON HILLS FIRE RESCUE | $89,181 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $86,750 |
| LOWER KISKI AMBULANCE SERVICE INC | $75,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $75,000 |
| ELFINWILD VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $482k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
152 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2025, 117 since wound down; 114 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.8M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LULEHIGH UNIVERSITY4× · 2020–2023 · $260k · revenue +66%
- GFGREENSBURG FIRE DEPT BOARD OF CONTROL7× · 2017–2025 · $222k · revenue +130%
- VSVALLEY SCHOOL OF LIGONIER3× · 2019–2024 · $180k · revenue +61%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $157k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $150k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $150k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide protection and emergency medical services to residents of north wales borough, lower gwynedd township, upper gwynedd township and surrounding communities.
To provide Fire Protection and Emergency Services to the Community
All volunteer fire department provides fire and rescue services to the surrounding communities.
The mission of the lancaster township fire department is to serve the community by protecting lives,property and the environment in a safe, efficient and professional manner. the fire department is responsible for extinguishing fires, fire…
Providing emergency, safety and fire services to lawrence park township pennsylvania.
To provide fire and ambulance (and other emergency support) for emergency calls for the City of Lower Burrell, PA which has approximately 14,000 residents.
Operation of a volunteer fire company for the local communities in pike county, pa.
Provides volunteer fire protection and rescue services to the seelyville, pa and surrounding area.
Volunteer fire company
Provide Fire Prevention & Protection Services
Provide emergency medical services and fire runs Training of volunteer EMS and fire personnel maintenance and repair of equipment.
Provide fire protection to community
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lakemont Volunteer Fire Company and the most unlike its peers is Mr Mesz Memorial. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
413 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 413 of the 787 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LEHIGH UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds GREENSBURG FIRE DEPT BOARD OF CONTROL ↗
- Who funds YOUNGWOOD VOLUNTEER HOSE CO #1 ↗
- Who funds Private Industry Council Inc ↗
- Who funds VALLEY SCHOOL OF LIGONIER ↗
- Who funds CARNEGIE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds GROVE CITY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds WARREN COUNTY FAIR INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds Police Athletic League of North Huntingdon ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER JOHNSTOWN ↗
- Who funds Yough Alliance for Academics Arts & Athletics Foundation ↗
- Who funds WESTMORELAND HOMESTEAD VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
- Who funds Penn Township Athletic Association ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL WESTMORELAND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOWER KISKI AMBULANCE SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds CLARIDGE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
- Who funds PITTSBURGH TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIATA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds GEISINGER HEALTH ↗
- Who funds FAMILY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Deer Lakes Softball Inc ↗
- Who funds PITCARE INC ↗
- Who funds TURKEYTOWN SOUTH HUNTINGTON TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Richard King Mellon Foundation · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Eqt Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Community Foundation of Greater Johnstown · Upmc Group · Aj and Sigismunda Palumbo Charitable Trust · Allegheny Foundation · McCune Foundation Pnc Bank Na · Robertshaw Charitable Foundation · Katherine Mabis McKenna Foundation · Firstenergy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Scott Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Blind Industries & Services of Maryland — 100% of income from government
- Hagerstown Goodwill Industries Inc — 31% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Mount Saint Mary's University Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.