Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

San Angelo Area Foundation

The mission of the SAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION is to build a legacy of philanthropy by attracting and prudently managing endowed gifts in order to match donor interest with community needs of the area.

$18M
Granted FY2024still arriving
158
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Religion$14MEducation$11MArts & Culture$10MHealth$8.9MYouth Development$7.5MCrime & Legal$3.8MFood & Nutrition$3.1MHuman Services$2.9MOther$0
02FY2024 · 158 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 158 grants below total $10,046,675 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $18,485,426 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $8,438,751 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k29 grants · $208k
  • $10k–50k80 grants · $1.7M
  • $50k–250k41 grants · $4.3M
  • $250k+8 grants · $3.9M
$23,954
Median grant
10
States reached
$273M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN ANGELO MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS$1,484,739
LA ESPERANZA CLINIC INC$600,675
FAMILY MATTERS$350,000
SCOUTING AMERICA-TEXAS SOUTHWEST COUNCIL$321,479
THE SALVATION ARMY$318,735
MARY ELLEN KENT BUNYARD FAMILY FOUNDATION$285,000
HOUSE OF FAITH-SAN ANGELO$260,135
GOSPEL BROADCASTING NETWORK$250,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$213,000
APOLOGETICS PRESS$210,000
MEALS FOR THE ELDERLY$202,024
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER WEST TEXAS INC$190,964
WEST TEXAS COUNSELING & GUIDANCE$180,411
SAN ANGELO EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER$163,000
PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF THE CONCHO VALLEY$159,873
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $4.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $100k → 6%ARMS OF HOPE: $100k → 12%MCCULLOCH COUNTY HELPING HANDS: $17k → 19%NEW MEXICO CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $60k → 18%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $50k → 6%ARMS OF HOPE: $100k → 12%LAKE IVIE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $25k → 20%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $19k → 17%THE GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO TEXAS: $40k → 16%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $19k → 17%THE GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO TEXAS: $39k → 16%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $18k → 17%THE GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO TEXAS: $28k → 16%CURA BRASIL: $32k → 13%CURA BRASIL: $24k → 13%POSSIBILITIES OF THE CONCHO VALLEY: $19k → 13%KEEPERS OF HOPE: $17k → 13%POSSIBILITIES OF THE CONCHO VALLEY: $15k → 13%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANGELO: $605k → 13%SAN ANGELO EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $163k → 13%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANGELO: $144k → 13%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANGELO: $107k → 13%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANGELO: $73k → 13%CHRISTIANS IN ACTION INC: $55k → 13%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANGELO: $46k → 13%CHRISTIANS IN ACTION INC: $45k → 13%CHRISTIANS IN ACTION INC: $43k → 13%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANGELO: $34k → 13%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANGELO: $33k → 13%SAN ANGELO EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $27k → 13%YMCA: $25k → 13%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANGELO: $19k → 13%PROJECT DIGNIDAD: $19k → 13%SAN ANGELO EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $18k → 13%PROJECT DIGNIDAD: $15k → 13%SAN ANGELO EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $14k → 13%LA ESPERANZA CLINIC INC: $601k → 13%PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF THE CONCHO VALLEY: $209k → 13%PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF THE CONCHO VALLEY: $169k → 13%PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF THE CONCHO VALLEY: $160k → 13%PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF THE CONCHO VALLEY: $153k → 13%PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF THE CONCHO VALLEY: $111k → 13%LA ESPERANZA CLINIC INC: $106k → 13%PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF THE CONCHO VALLEY: $97k → 13%PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF THE CONCHO VALLEY: $92k → 13%PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF THE CONCHO VALLEY: $34k → 13%LA ESPERANZA CLINIC INC: $16k → 13%CURA BRASIL: $15k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
WY
IA
IN
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$63M · 206 repeat orgs$5.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

206 repeat relationships — 129 still active in FY2024, 77 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

206
98

Total granted

$63M
$4.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+14%

Still filing today

58%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $627k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthReligionArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.1M · revenue +62% · 63% of their budget
  • AS
    ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +156%
  • WT
    WEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +203%

Funded once

  • CI
    CHRISTOVAL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2020 · $3.0M
  • AC
    AMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +42%
  • MS
    MCCARTY STUDENT CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
2
San Antonio Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
—
3
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
4
Christian Home of Pecos

Christain Home

Crime & Legal
5
San Antonio Christian School

Partner with families to provide students a christ-centered education while fostering a life of faith and service. the school desires to associate with like-minded teachers, administrators, staff, parents, and students to communicate the…

—
6
South Texas Youth for Christ

San antonio youth for christ is a religious youth organization that seeks to engage young people wherever they are found as lifelong followers of jesus christ.

—
7
San Antonio Foster Care and Adoption and Services

San antonio foster care and adoption services inc. is a licensed child placement agency in the state of texas. the organization cares for children placed in foster care by the state of texas.

Human Services
8
Hospice of San Angelo Inc

Hospice of san angelo, inc. (hospice or organization) provides an expert approach to care for those living with a limiting illness in the comfort of their own home and designated nursing homes throughout the twelve counties in the west…

—
9
San Antonio Christian Dental Clinic

Sa christian dental clinic's mission is to extend christ's healing by providing charitable dental care to underserved bexar county adults. the vision of the clinic is a commitment to creating a community in which dental care and optimal…

—
10
Texas Girls and Boys Ranch

Sharing jesus, healing hearts, transforming lives.

Human Services
11
Foster Angels of South Texas Foundation

The foundation's sole purpose is to enrich the lives of children in foster care in south texas.

Human Services
12
Center for 20TH Century Texas Studies
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Institute of Cognitive Development Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mary Ellen Kent Bunyard Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyParks & Gardens StewardshipCommunity Grantmaking Found…Regional Business ChambersPerforming Arts Organizatio…Family Philanthropic Founda…International Christian Eva…Youth Sports LeaguesAnimal Rescue & Shelter Ser…K-12 Charter and Private Sc…Labor Union LocalsProfessional Trade Associat…First Responder Support Org…Crisis Shelter and Resident…School District Education F…K-12 Education & Youth Deve…Construction Industry Assoc…University Support Foundati…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%2%<5yr16%14%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr17%23%20–35yr10%22%35–55yr11%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%0%<5yr16%3%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr17%22%20–35yr10%41%35–55yr11%23%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%4/327
the rest of the field
16%
8,170/50,821

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

194 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 194 of the 327 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

37
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
51
Early backer (in before they grew)
183/194
Grantees still filing
117/194
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FORT CONCHO FOUNDATION — $4,107,219 · OtherFORT CONCHO FOUNDATIONCHRISTOVAL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT — $2,995,000 · OtherCHRISTOVAL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTFAMILY MATTERS INC — $2,515,000 · OtherFAMILY MATTERS INCFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF SAN ANGELO TEXAS — $1,756,000 · OtherHOUSE OF FAITH - SAN ANGELO — $1,468,680 · Other+135 more — $26,183,339 · Other+135 moreWEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE — $2,425,608 · HealthWEST TEXAS…The West Texas Rehabilitation Center — $2,009,906 · HealthThe West T…CONCHO VALLEY CENTER FOR HUMAN ADVANCEMENT — $627,309 · HealthCONCHO VAL…CONCHO VALLEY TURNING POINT — $529,390 · HealthCONCHO VAL…+8 more — $579,959 · Health+8 moreSan Angelo Museum of Fine Arts — $3,074,264 · Arts & CultureSan Angel…SAN ANGELO PERFORMING ARTS COALITION INC — $1,304,493 · Arts & CultureSAN ANGEL…APOLOGETICS PRESS INC — $527,000 · Arts & CultureAPOLOGETI…ART IN UNCOMMON PLACES — $267,532 · Arts & CultureFORT CHADBOURNE FOUNDATION — $221,006 · Arts & Culture+6 more — $380,699 · Arts & Culture+6 moreANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $2,476,599 · EducationCORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $1,409,178 · EducationSAN ANGELO CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $362,915 · Education+10 more — $600,553 · EducationCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER WEST TEXAS — $4,444,530 · Civil RightsYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANGELO TEXAS — $1,088,189 · Human ServicesPREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY INC — $1,024,452 · Human ServicesLA ESPERANZA CLINIC INC — $740,534 · Human ServicesSAN ANGELO EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER — $247,760 · Human ServicesARMS OF HOPE — $200,000 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES — $150,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTIANS IN ACTION — $149,618 · Human Services+10 more — $680,462 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF THE CONCHO VALLEY INC — $1,345,921 · PhilanthropySAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION — $775,465 · PhilanthropySUTTON COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $302,222 · PhilanthropyMary Ellen Kent Bunyard Family Foundation — $285,000 · PhilanthropyBamberger Ranch Preserve — $212,500 · Philanthropy+1 more — $31,000 · Philanthropy
Other$39,025,238Health$6,172,172Arts & Culture$5,774,994Education$4,849,245Civil Rights$4,444,530Human Services$4,281,015Philanthropy$2,952,108

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER WEST TEXAS — $4,444,530 over 8y, 32% of budgetFORT CONCHO FOUNDATION — $4,107,219 over 8y, 58% of budgetSan Angelo Museum of Fine Arts — $3,074,264 over 8y, 63% of budgetFAMILY MATTERS INC — $2,515,000 over 8y, 31% of budgetANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $2,476,599 over 7y, 15% of budgetWEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE — $2,425,608 over 8y, 15% of budgetThe West Texas Rehabilitation Center — $2,009,906 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetHOUSE OF FAITH - SAN ANGELO — $1,468,680 over 8y, 27% of budgetCORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $1,409,178 over 4y, 33% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE CONCHO VALLEY INC — $1,345,921 over 8y, 30% of budgetSAN ANGELO PERFORMING ARTS COALITION INC — $1,304,493 over 8y, 17% of budgetTEXAS SOUTHWEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $1,189,584 over 8y, 56% of budgetWEST TEXAS BOYS RANCH — $1,140,307 over 8y, 14% of budgetMEALS FOR THE ELDERLY INC — $1,104,283 over 8y, 13% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANGELO TEXAS — $1,088,189 over 8y, 20% of budgetPREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY INC — $1,024,452 over 8y, 30% of budgetConcho Valley Regional Food Bank — $973,346 over 8y, 32% of budgetSAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION — $775,465 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetLA ESPERANZA CLINIC INC — $740,534 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetRUST STREET MINISTRIES — $670,904 over 8y, 33% of budgetCONCHO VALLEY CENTER FOR HUMAN ADVANCEMENT — $627,309 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetCONCHO VALLEY HOME FOR GIRLS INC — $600,770 over 8y, 23% of budgetHumane Society of Tom Green County Concho Valley PAWS — $542,871 over 8y, 13% of budgetALCOHOL & DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL FOR THE CONCHO VALLEY — $535,935 over 8y, 6.1% of budgetCONCHO VALLEY TURNING POINT — $529,390 over 8y, 76% of budgetAPOLOGETICS PRESS INC — $527,000 over 8y, 17% of budgetGALILEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $492,228 over 7y, 9.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CONCHO VALLEY — $435,714 over 8y, 15% of budgetCRITTER SHACK HUMANE SOC OF MENARD — $435,652 over 8y, 37% of budgetSAN ANGELO CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $362,915 over 4y, 19% of budgetSUTTON COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $302,222 over 8y, 59% of budgetMary Ellen Kent Bunyard Family Foundation — $285,000 over 1y, 55% of budgetCASSIES PLACE — $268,295 over 8y, 13% of budgetART IN UNCOMMON PLACES — $267,532 over 8y, 36% of budgetINSTITUTE OF COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT INC — $263,233 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetBishop Street Bootcamp Ranch — $251,903 over 4y, 35% of budgetSAN ANGELO EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER — $247,760 over 6y, 16% of budgetWORLD VIDEO BIBLE SCHOOL — $245,000 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetSAN ANGELO CIVIC BALLET — $239,898 over 8y, 13% of budgetF V HALL & MARYLOU HALL CHILDRENS CRISIS FUND — $239,586 over 3y, 21% of budgetSONRISAS THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC — $233,005 over 8y, 20% of budgetSAN ANGELO SYMPHONY SOCIETY — $222,864 over 8y, 5.6% of budgetFORT CHADBOURNE FOUNDATION — $221,006 over 8y, 30% of budgetBamberger Ranch Preserve — $212,500 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetARMS OF HOPE — $200,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetBAPTIST MEMORIALS MINISTRIES — $196,906 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetPLAYLAND COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION — $193,469 over 2y, 96% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of San Angelo Inc — $192,341 over 8y, 12% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER WEST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds FORT CONCHO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY MATTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE ↗
  • Who funds The West Texas Rehabilitation Center ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF FAITH - SAN ANGELO ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE CONCHO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANGELO PERFORMING ARTS COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS SOUTHWEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS BOYS RANCH ↗
  • Who funds MEALS FOR THE ELDERLY INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANGELO TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds Concho Valley Regional Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LA ESPERANZA CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds RUST STREET MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds CONCHO VALLEY CENTER FOR HUMAN ADVANCEMENT ↗
  • Who funds CONCHO VALLEY HOME FOR GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of Tom Green County Concho Valley PAWS ↗
  • Who funds ALCOHOL & DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL FOR THE CONCHO VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds CONCHO VALLEY TURNING POINT ↗
  • Who funds APOLOGETICS PRESS INC ↗
  • Who funds GALILEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CONCHO VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds CRITTER SHACK HUMANE SOC OF MENARD ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Angelo Health Fou…Art and Eva Camunez T…Mary Ellen Kent Bunya…Stribling Funding Cor…United Way of the Con…San Antonio Food BankKickapoo Springs Foun…James B and Lois R Ar…Methodist Healthcare …Foundation for TruthF V Hall & Marylou Ha…Permian Basin Area Fo…
San Angelo Health FoundationTX84.4× affinity39 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Angelo Health Foundation · Art and Eva Camunez Tucker Foundation · Mary Ellen Kent Bunyard Family Foundation · Stribling Funding Corporation · United Way of the Concho Valley Inc · San Antonio Food Bank · Kickapoo Springs Foundation · James B and Lois R Archer Charitable Foundation · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc · Foundation for Truth · F V Hall & Marylou Hall Childrens Crisis Fund · Permian Basin Area Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization San Angelo Area Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    36report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 327 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines