· Private foundation
Art and Eva Camunez Tucker Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k23 grants · $513k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $131k
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Howard College | $250,000 |
| Salvation Army | $75,000 |
| Whit Program | $55,500 |
| Wall Brethren Church | $42,845 |
| St Joseph's Catholic Church | $35,000 |
| Club Victoria Emergency Shelter | $35,000 |
| Angelo Civic Theater | $34,120 |
| Wesley Trinity First United Methodi | $30,000 |
| Operation Finally Home | $30,000 |
| Ballet of San Angelo | $28,406 |
| Christ The King Retreat Center | $25,624 |
| West Texas Counseling and Guidance | $25,000 |
| San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts | $25,000 |
| Concho Valley PAWS | $25,000 |
| House of Faith | $24,997 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
59 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $321k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BSBishop Street Bootcamp Ranch7× · 2018–2025 · $184k · revenue +132%
- HSHumane Society of Tom Green County Concho Valley PAWS4× · 2017–2025 · $160k · revenue +71%
- WVWall Volunteer Fire Department Inc2× · 2019–2022 · $110k · revenue +123% · 35% of their budget
Funded once
- BCBallinger Chamber of Commerceone grant, 2023 · $158k
- WTWest Texas Rehabilitaion Centerone grant, 2024 · $100k
- SCSaint Charles Catholic Churchone grant, 2022 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide safe affordable housing to the elderly and disabled.
To benefit, perform functions of, and carry out the purposes of johnson street church of christ, san angelo, texas a texas non-profit corporation with a special emphasis of its purposes related to the support of the elderly.
Hospice of san angelo, inc. (hospice or organization) provides an expert approach to care for those living with a limiting illness in the comfort of their own home and designated nursing homes throughout the twelve counties in the west…
Volunteer Fire Department, providing fire, rescue, and medical services to a population of approximately 22,000 residents, 24 hours per day, 365 days per year.
To enhance the ability of families to protect, nuture, and educate their children in the first five years of life and enable them to enter school ready to learn.
To serve as a clerainghouse for salvage and surplus food that otherwise might be wasted.
To alleviate hunger in the immediate service area through the distribution of food products donated by the usda, feeding america, area grocery stores, etc. which are distributed to the needy by way of area food banks and other qualified…
To protect the lives and property of the citizens of the city and county of San Saba, Texas.
The mission of the san antonio food bank is to fight hunger in southwest texas through food distribution, programs, education and advocacy.
Fire fighting for the community of salado, tx and surrounding area. maintains the fire equipment, provides education for fire firefighters and protect the community and surrounding area.
Mobilize volunteers or skilled professionals to meet needs that primarily serve the san marcos, texas area.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Concho Valley Home for Girls Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ballinger Cares Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAN ANGELO SYMPHONY SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Bishop Street Bootcamp Ranch ↗
- Who funds Humane Society of Tom Green County Concho Valley PAWS ↗
- Who funds SAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity of San Angelo Inc ↗
- Who funds Wall Volunteer Fire Department Inc ↗
- Who funds WEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE ↗
- Who funds San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts ↗
- Who funds VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF TEXAS ↗
- Who funds OPERATION FINALLY HOME ↗
- Who funds CHRISTOVAL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
- Who funds THE WHIT PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds CONCHO VALLEY BIBLICAL COUNSELING CENTER ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CONCHO VALLEY ↗
- Who funds MEALS FOR THE ELDERLY INC ↗
- Who funds CONCHO VALLEY TURNING POINT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: San Angelo Area Foundation · San Angelo Health Foundation · Mary Ellen Kent Bunyard Family Foundation · Kickapoo Springs Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · Pak Foundation · James B and Lois R Archer Charitable Foundation · Stribling Funding Corporation · United Way of the Concho Valley Inc · San Antonio Food Bank · F V Hall & Marylou Hall Childrens Crisis Fund · Wynne Family Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Art and Eva Camunez Tucker Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Art and Eva Camunez Tucker Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Art and Eva Camunez Tucker Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.