Skip to content
San Angelo Area Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

San Angelo Area Foundation

The mission of the SAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION is to build a legacy of philanthropy by attracting and prudently managing endowed gifts in order to match donor interest with community needs of the area.

$19M
Granted FY2025still arriving
181
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$14MEducation$11MArts & Culture$10MHealth$8.9MYouth Development$7.5MCrime & Legal$3.8MFood & Nutrition$3.1MHuman Services$2.9MOther$0
02FY2025 · 181 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 181 grants below total $9,290,151, the rows itemized in this filing. The $19,240,787 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $9,950,636 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k36 grants · $256k
  • $10k–50k94 grants · $2.2M
  • $50k–250k45 grants · $4.3M
  • $250k+6 grants · $2.6M
$25,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$335M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUTHERAN HOUR MINISTRIES$1,000,000
MARY ELLEN KENT BUNYARD FAMILY FOUNDATION$455,000
FAMILY MATTERS$296,250
SCOUTING AMERICA-TEXAS SOUTHWEST COUNCIL$289,490
HOUSE OF FAITH-SAN ANGELO$271,237
LILLIAN M HUDSPETH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL RANCH$265,278
WORLD VIDEO BIBLE SCHOOL$209,400
APOLOGETICS PRESS$205,300
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$203,965
GOSPEL BROADCASTING NETWORK$203,600
PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF THE CONCHO VALLEY$186,131
WEST TEXAS BOYS RANCH$162,283
WEST TEXAS COUNSELING & GUIDANCE$161,311
SAN ANGELO PERFORMING ARTS CENTER$158,995
MEALS FOR THE ELDERLY$158,004
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $4.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ARMS OF HOPE: $100k → 12%NEW MEXICO CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $60k → 18%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $123k → 6%ARMS OF HOPE: $100k → 12%LAKE IVIE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $25k → 20%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $100k → 6%ARMS OF HOPE: $100k → 12%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $50k → 6%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $19k → 17%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $19k → 17%THE GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO TEXAS: $40k → 16%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $18k → 17%THE GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO TEXAS: $39k → 16%THE GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO TEXAS: $28k → 16%LA GRAN FAMILIA MINISTRIES INC: $40k → 13%CURA BRASIL: $32k → 13%CURA BRASIL: $24k → 13%POSSIBILITIES OF THE CONCHO VALLEY: $19k → 13%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANGELO: $605k → 13%SAN ANGELO EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $163k → 13%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANGELO: $144k → 13%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANGELO: $107k → 13%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANGELO: $73k → 13%CHRISTIANS IN ACTION INC: $55k → 13%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANGELO: $47k → 13%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANGELO: $46k → 13%CHRISTIANS IN ACTION INC: $45k → 13%CHRISTIANS IN ACTION INC: $43k → 13%SAN ANGELO EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $42k → 13%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANGELO: $34k → 13%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANGELO: $33k → 13%SAN ANGELO EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $27k → 13%YMCA: $25k → 13%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANGELO: $19k → 13%PROJECT DIGNIDAD: $19k → 13%SAN ANGELO EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $18k → 13%LA ESPERANZA CLINIC INC: $601k → 13%PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF THE CONCHO VALLEY: $209k → 13%PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF THE CONCHO VALLEY: $186k → 13%PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF THE CONCHO VALLEY: $169k → 13%PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF THE CONCHO VALLEY: $160k → 13%PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF THE CONCHO VALLEY: $153k → 13%PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF THE CONCHO VALLEY: $111k → 13%LA ESPERANZA CLINIC INC: $106k → 13%PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF THE CONCHO VALLEY: $97k → 13%PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF THE CONCHO VALLEY: $92k → 13%LA ESPERANZA CLINIC INC: $67k → 13%PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF THE CONCHO VALLEY: $34k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
WY
IA
IN
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$72M · 222 repeat orgs$5.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

222 repeat relationships: 141 still active in FY2025, 81 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

222
102

Total granted

$72M
$4.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+14%

Still filing today

58%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $863k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthReligionArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.1M · revenue +62% · 63% of their budget
  • WT
    WEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +203%
  • AS
    ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +156%

Funded once

  • CI
    CHRISTOVAL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2020 · $3.0M
  • AC
    AMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +42%
  • MS
    MCCARTY STUDENT CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
2
San Antonio Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
—
3
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
4
Christian Home of Pecos

Christain Home

Crime & Legal
5
South Texas Youth for Christ

San antonio youth for christ is a religious youth organization that seeks to engage young people wherever they are found as lifelong followers of jesus christ.

—
6
Center for 20TH Century Texas Studies
—
7
San Antonio Christian School

Partner with families to provide students a christ-centered education while fostering a life of faith and service. the school desires to associate with like-minded teachers, administrators, staff, parents, and students to communicate the…

—
8
San Antonio Foster Care and Adoption and Services

San antonio foster care and adoption services inc. is a licensed child placement agency in the state of texas. the organization cares for children placed in foster care by the state of texas.

Human Services
9
Crime Stoppers of South Texas Inc
—
10
Hendrick Home for Children
—
11
Texas Girls and Boys Ranch

Sharing jesus, healing hearts, transforming lives.

Human Services
12
San Antonio Christian Dental Clinic

Sa christian dental clinic's mission is to extend christ's healing by providing charitable dental care to underserved bexar county adults. the vision of the clinic is a commitment to creating a community in which dental care and optimal…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Institute of Cognitive Development Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mary Ellen Kent Bunyard Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

206 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 206 of the 355 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

38
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
54
Early backer (in before they grew)
194/206
Grantees still filing
121/206
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FORT CONCHO FOUNDATION: $4,168,104 · OtherFORT CONCHO FOUNDATIONCHRISTOVAL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $2,995,000 · OtherCHRISTOVAL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTFAMILY MATTERS INC: $2,811,250 · OtherFAMILY MATTERS INCINTERNATIONAL LUTHERAN LAYMENS LEAGUE: $2,100,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF SAN ANGELO TEXAS: $1,959,965 · OtherHOUSE OF FAITH - SAN ANGELO: $1,739,917 · Other+133 more: $29,141,533 · Other+133 moreWEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE: $2,586,919 · HealthWEST TEXAS…The West Texas Rehabilitation Center: $2,195,392 · HealthThe West T…CONCHO VALLEY TURNING POINT: $654,849 · HealthCONCHO VAL…CONCHO VALLEY CENTER FOR HUMAN ADVANCEMENT: $653,225 · HealthCONCHO VAL…+8 more: $646,512 · Health+8 moreSan Angelo Museum of Fine Arts: $3,137,093 · Arts & CultureSan Angel…SAN ANGELO PERFORMING ARTS COALITION INC: $1,472,936 · Arts & CultureSAN ANGEL…APOLOGETICS PRESS INC: $732,300 · Arts & CultureAPOLOGETI…ART IN UNCOMMON PLACES: $298,253 · Arts & CultureFORT CHADBOURNE FOUNDATION: $226,056 · Arts & Culture+7 more: $450,889 · Arts & Culture+7 morePREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY INC: $1,210,583 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANGELO TEXAS: $1,135,006 · Human ServicesLA ESPERANZA CLINIC INC: $807,784 · Human ServicesARMS OF HOPE: $300,000 · Human ServicesSAN ANGELO EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $289,860 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES: $272,500 · Human Services+12 more: $957,830 · Human ServicesANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,514,963 · EducationCORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $1,445,911 · EducationSAN ANGELO CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $383,965 · Education+9 more: $597,175 · EducationCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER WEST TEXAS: $4,508,252 · Civil RightsUNITED WAY OF THE CONCHO VALLEY INC: $1,397,924 · PhilanthropySAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION: $992,751 · PhilanthropyMary Ellen Kent Bunyard Family Foundation: $740,000 · PhilanthropySUTTON COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $322,751 · PhilanthropyBamberger Ranch Preserve: $226,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $80,000 · Philanthropy
Other$44,915,769Health$6,736,897Arts & Culture$6,317,527Human Services$4,973,563Education$4,942,014Civil Rights$4,508,252Philanthropy$3,759,426

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER WEST TEXAS: $4,508,252 over 9y, 32% of budgetFORT CONCHO FOUNDATION: $4,168,104 over 9y, 58% of budgetSan Angelo Museum of Fine Arts: $3,137,093 over 9y, 63% of budgetFAMILY MATTERS INC: $2,811,250 over 9y, 31% of budgetWEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE: $2,586,919 over 9y, 15% of budgetANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,514,963 over 8y, 15% of budgetThe West Texas Rehabilitation Center: $2,195,392 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetHOUSE OF FAITH - SAN ANGELO: $1,739,917 over 9y, 27% of budgetTEXAS SOUTHWEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $1,479,074 over 9y, 56% of budgetSAN ANGELO PERFORMING ARTS COALITION INC: $1,472,936 over 9y, 17% of budgetCORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $1,445,911 over 5y, 33% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE CONCHO VALLEY INC: $1,397,924 over 9y, 30% of budgetWEST TEXAS BOYS RANCH: $1,302,590 over 9y, 14% of budgetMEALS FOR THE ELDERLY INC: $1,262,287 over 9y, 13% of budgetPREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY INC: $1,210,583 over 9y, 30% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANGELO TEXAS: $1,135,006 over 9y, 20% of budgetConcho Valley Regional Food Bank: $1,081,765 over 9y, 32% of budgetSAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION: $992,751 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetLA ESPERANZA CLINIC INC: $807,784 over 6y, 5.8% of budgetMary Ellen Kent Bunyard Family Foundation: $740,000 over 2y, 55% of budgetRUST STREET MINISTRIES: $738,081 over 9y, 33% of budgetAPOLOGETICS PRESS INC: $732,300 over 9y, 17% of budgetCONCHO VALLEY TURNING POINT: $654,849 over 9y, 76% of budgetCONCHO VALLEY CENTER FOR HUMAN ADVANCEMENT: $653,225 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetCONCHO VALLEY HOME FOR GIRLS INC: $646,546 over 9y, 23% of budgetHumane Society of Tom Green County Concho Valley PAWS: $587,766 over 9y, 13% of budgetALCOHOL & DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL FOR THE CONCHO VALLEY: $569,477 over 9y, 6.1% of budgetCRITTER SHACK HUMANE SOC OF MENARD: $516,493 over 9y, 37% of budgetGALILEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $508,430 over 8y, 9.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CONCHO VALLEY: $496,800 over 9y, 15% of budgetWORLD VIDEO BIBLE SCHOOL: $454,400 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetSAN ANGELO CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $383,965 over 5y, 19% of budgetSUTTON COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $322,751 over 9y, 59% of budgetCASSIES PLACE: $317,015 over 9y, 13% of budgetINSTITUTE OF COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT INC: $315,117 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetF V HALL & MARYLOU HALL CHILDRENS CRISIS FUND: $314,586 over 4y, 21% of budgetSAN ANGELO CIVIC BALLET: $309,295 over 9y, 13% of budgetARMS OF HOPE: $300,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetART IN UNCOMMON PLACES: $298,253 over 9y, 36% of budgetSAN ANGELO EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $289,860 over 7y, 16% of budgetBishop Street Bootcamp Ranch: $284,673 over 5y, 35% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES: $272,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSAN ANGELO SYMPHONY SOCIETY: $262,048 over 9y, 6.8% of budgetSONRISAS THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $260,133 over 9y, 20% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of San Angelo Inc: $247,384 over 9y, 15% of budgetFORT CHADBOURNE FOUNDATION: $226,056 over 9y, 30% of budgetBamberger Ranch Preserve: $226,000 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetBAPTIST MEMORIALS MINISTRIES: $204,892 over 9y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER WEST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds FORT CONCHO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY MATTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE ↗
  • Who funds ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The West Texas Rehabilitation Center ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF FAITH - SAN ANGELO ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS SOUTHWEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANGELO PERFORMING ARTS COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE CONCHO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS BOYS RANCH ↗
  • Who funds MEALS FOR THE ELDERLY INC ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY HELP CENTER OF CONCHO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANGELO TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Concho Valley Regional Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LA ESPERANZA CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds Mary Ellen Kent Bunyard Family Foundation ↗
  • Who funds RUST STREET MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds APOLOGETICS PRESS INC ↗
  • Who funds CONCHO VALLEY TURNING POINT ↗
  • Who funds CONCHO VALLEY CENTER FOR HUMAN ADVANCEMENT ↗
  • Who funds CONCHO VALLEY HOME FOR GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of Tom Green County Concho Valley PAWS ↗
  • Who funds ALCOHOL & DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL FOR THE CONCHO VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds CRITTER SHACK HUMANE SOC OF MENARD ↗
  • Who funds GALILEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CONCHO VALLEY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Angelo Health Fou…Art and Eva Camunez T…Mary Ellen Kent Bunya…Stribling Funding Cor…United Way of the Con…San Antonio Food BankKickapoo Springs Foun…James B and Lois R Ar…Methodist Healthcare …Foundation for TruthF V Hall & Marylou Ha…Permian Basin Area Fo…
San Angelo Health FoundationTX84.4× affinity39 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Angelo Health Foundation · Art and Eva Camunez Tucker Foundation · Mary Ellen Kent Bunyard Family Foundation · Stribling Funding Corporation · United Way of the Concho Valley Inc · San Antonio Food Bank · Kickapoo Springs Foundation · James B and Lois R Archer Charitable Foundation · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc · Foundation for Truth · F V Hall & Marylou Hall Childrens Crisis Fund · Permian Basin Area Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization San Angelo Area Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from San Angelo Area Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    36report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 355 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on San Angelo Area’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home