· Public charity
United Way of the Concho Valley Inc
See schedule o the united way of the concho valley's mission is to increase the organized capacity of people to care for one another by attracting and engaging human, financial and creative resources.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k8 grants · $279k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $341k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WEST TEXAS COUNSELING & GUIDANCE CENTER | $94,131 |
| CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF TGC INC | $77,238 |
| ALCOHOL AND DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL | $60,556 |
| YMCA OF SAN ANGELO TEXAS | $55,229 |
| CONCHO VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION | $53,774 |
| CONCHO VALLEY REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF TX | $49,467 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE CONCHO VALLEY | $46,469 |
| OZONA COMMUNITY CENTER | $40,669 |
| SAN ANGELO EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER | $35,641 |
| ICD FAMILY SHELTER | $31,299 |
| GALILEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | $30,559 |
| SAN ANGELO CLUBHOUSE | $25,523 |
| CONCHO VALLEY TURNING POINT | $19,568 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $944k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
20 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WTWEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE9× · 2017–2025 · $520k · revenue +203%
- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANGELO TEXAS9× · 2017–2025 · $483k · revenue +31%
- ADALCOHOL & DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL FOR THE CONCHO VALLEY9× · 2017–2025 · $450k · revenue +123%
Funded once
- ALADULT LITERACY COUNCILone grant, 2019 · $26k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…
Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.
The children's advocacy center of van zandt county is committed to ensuring quality services and support to those children impacted by abuse while also building a future where no child in van zandt county experiences abuse.
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those from disadvantaged circumstances, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.
Crisis pregnancy counseling.
To provide services for the protection of abused and neglected children that are in the custody of the State of Texas.
The center is fully operational treatment facility involving child victims of physical and sexual abuse. Children affected by abuse were provided with therapy and professional guidance through the legal and counseling system which the…
Child Advocacy
To provide services designed to meet the physical, social, and emotional needs of domestic violence and sexual assault victims by providing for immediate, short, and long-term needs.
To protect and enhance the quality of life for abused and neglected children in Medina, Real and Uvalde Counties of Texas.
The H.O.W. Center provides a safe and structured living environment for individuals recovering from alcoholism and addiction while they gain the skills they need to live independently and successfully.
To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all children and adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention services advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Concho Valley Home for Girls Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ozona Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER WEST TEXAS ↗
- Who funds WEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANGELO TEXAS ↗
- Who funds ALCOHOL & DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL FOR THE CONCHO VALLEY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CONCHO VALLEY ↗
- Who funds SAN ANGELO EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER ↗
- Who funds Concho Valley Regional Food Bank ↗
- Who funds CONCHO VALLEY HOME FOR GIRLS INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE OF COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds GALILEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds SONRISAS THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MENARD ↗
- Who funds TEXAS SOUTHWEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds OZONA COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds LA ESPERANZA CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds TOM GREEN COUNTY ADULT LITERACY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds CONCHO VALLEY TURNING POINT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: San Angelo Area Foundation · San Angelo Health Foundation · Mary Ellen Kent Bunyard Family Foundation · Art and Eva Camunez Tucker Foundation · Kickapoo Springs Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of the Concho Valley Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.