· Public charity
Reverb Inc
Deeply rooted within the music and environmental communities, reverb educates and engages musicians and their fans to take action toward a more sustainable future.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 33 grants below total $678,491 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $955,734 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $277,243 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k19 grants · $139k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $210k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $329k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOUND FUTURE FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| CHARLOTTESVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FDN | $95,937 |
| MUSICARES FOUNDATION | $82,723 |
| DIG DEEP RIGHT TO WATER PROJECT | $50,000 |
| NATIVE RENEWABLES INC | $37,133 |
| ONE DROP | $29,000 |
| OCEANA | $29,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD FED | $28,000 |
| HEADCOUNT | $20,105 |
| URBAN TILTH | $19,000 |
| SUPPORT AND FEED | $15,000 |
| OXFAM | $12,742 |
| PLANET REIMAGINED INC | $10,471 |
| WATER MISSION | $10,000 |
| FRONT AND CENTERED | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
33 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $69k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HCHEAD COUNT INC4× · 2018–2024 · $684k · revenue +533%
- SFSOUND FUTURE FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $210k · revenue +1%
- MFMUSICARES FOUNDATION INC2× · 2023–2024 · $174k · revenue +89%
Funded once
- SSOULARDARITYone grant, 2022 · $312k · revenue +7%
The Ocean Foundationone grant, 2023 · $158k · revenue -30%- TATHE AFFORDABLE HOUSING OPPORTUNITY FUNDgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $143k · revenue +45%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.
Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.
Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…
Zero foodprint is mobilizing the food world around agricultural climate solutions. our work aims to create a circular economy that incentivizes practices that actively draw down carbon dioxide and offer our best hope of addressing the…
Earthenable works to solve the housing crisis in africa by revolutionizing the rural housing industry through innovative, affordable, and sustainable home-building solutions. its mission is to create healthier, safer, and climate-resilient…
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
Environment next supports individuals, nonprofits and businesses around the world on solutions to complex climate issues. we provide leadership, outreach and communication support, grants, and investments to empower leaders and their ideas…
To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.
To research and develop healthy climate solutions comprising global food security, ecosystem regeneration and carbon balance in seas and soils.
Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planet Reimagined Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Affordable Housing Opportunity Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
90 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 90 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHARLOTTESVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEAD COUNT INC ↗
- Who funds SOULARDARITY ↗
- Who funds SOUND FUTURE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MUSICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Urban Tilth ↗
- Who funds The Ocean Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING OPPORTUNITY FUND ↗
- Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds THE DIGDEEP RIGHT TO WATER PROJECT ↗
- Who funds NATIVE RENEWABLES INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds OCEANA INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
- Who funds WHYHUNGER INC ↗
- Who funds D'ADDARIO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Furthur Foundation ↗
- Who funds One Drop Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE OWSLEY STANLEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CONSCIOUS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds The Jerry Garcia Foundation ↗
- Who funds HAWAII ALLIANCE FOR PROGRESSIVE ACTION ↗
- Who funds REX FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Rainforest Action Network ↗
- Who funds LEAVING A POSITIVE LEGACY INC ↗
- Who funds MGVP INC Mountain Gorilla Veterinary Project ↗
- Who funds LAST PRISONER PROJECT ↗
- Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL FOR ADVANCED RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds Heart and Armor Foundation ↗
- Who funds The Forecastle Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds GIVEPOWER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Solutions Project Inc ↗
- Who funds YUCATAN ENVIRONMENTAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CALLING ALL CROWS INC ↗
- Who funds PARKS CALIFORNIA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Windward Fund · Activist Foundation Inc · Pledgeling Foundation · Family Promise Inc · Patagoniaorg · Impactassetsinc · Tides Foundation · Analog Devices Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Express Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Reverb Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Tulsa Day Center Inc — 9% of income from government
- Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation — 2% of income from government
- Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.