· Public charity
Family Promise Inc
To prevent and end homelessness for families with children and help them achieve sustainable independence using a community-based response.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 108 grants below total $3,991,373 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,605,214 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $613,841 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k92 grants · $2.3M
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.2M
- $250k+1 grant · $456k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FAMILY PROMISE OF WEST MICHIGAN | $456,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY | $227,500 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF SPOKANE | $140,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF THE MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY | $140,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF LAS VEGAS | $140,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF LAWRENCE | $105,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ORLANDO | $86,775 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS | $75,893 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER PHOENIX | $75,009 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY | $75,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY | $70,898 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF BALDWIN COUNTY | $56,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF THE TRIANGLE | $56,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF GAINESVILLE | $49,275 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF MISSOULA | $48,275 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $5.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
137 repeat relationships — 96 still active in FY2025, 41 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $240k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FPFamily Promise of Spokane6× · 2020–2025 · $341k · revenue +669%
- FPFAMILY PROMISE OF LAWRENCE INC7× · 2019–2025 · $340k · revenue +267%
- FPFAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTHWEST NJ4× · 2021–2025 · $288k · revenue +157% · 28% of their budget
Funded once
FAMILY PROMISE INCgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $123k · revenue +39%- FPFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CHARLESTONone grant, 2022 · $64k
- FPFamily Promise of NorthCentral Palm Beach Countyone grant, 2021 · $53k · revenue -34%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Family promise of carteret county is a non-profit organization serving homeless families. assisting targeted families with daily hot meals and overnight accommodations, (with partnering communities in faith).
To assist homeless families regain independence.
Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…
Provide temporary shelter, food, clothing, medical aid, and other resources to victims of domestic violence
To assist homeless families in securing stable housing
The mission of Fostering Promise is to ensure that every young person who ages out of foster care has a safe place to call home, the support of a caring mentor and the hope for a promising future.
To equip and empower homeless families with children to achieve sustainable independence.
The mission of family promise of gaston county is to provide compassionate, loving support of meals, shelter and counseling services through a community-based network to homeless families of gaston county, as well as fostering and…
Family promise of warren county (fpwc) is an independent, self-supporting private non-profit 501(c)(3) agency that has served homeless and low-income families and individuals since july 2008. our mission is to help households achieve…
Family Promise of Yucaipa-Calimesa aims to end family homelessness. We are an interfaith organization that partners with and mobilizes volunteers from the faith-based community to end homelessness for Yucaipa-Calimesa's families and their…
Empower and elevate families facing homelessness by leveraging the strengths of our community. our vision is that every family has a home, a livelihood, and the chance to build a stronger future.
To gather the communities of clay & platte counties in missouri in order to provide low-cost temporary shelter, meals, and assistance to qualifying homeless families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Grand Rapids and the most unlike its peers is Allegheny Valley Association of Churches. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
174 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 174 of the 178 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GRAND RAPIDS ↗
- Who funds Family Promise of Spokane ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF LAWRENCE INC ↗
- Who funds SALEM INTERFAITH HOSPITALITY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTHWEST NJ ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF LAS VEGAS INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF MORRIS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Family Promise of Greater Indianapolis Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF BURLINGTON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF HAWAII ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF SUSSEX COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF BELL COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF SHENANDOAH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Family Promise of San Gabriel Valley ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTH SARASOTA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF ATHENS INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE - GREATER PHOENIX ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF WAKE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Family Promise of Davie County ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GAINESVILLE FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CONCORD INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF ESSEX COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE NORTH SHORE BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds FORT BEND FAMILY PROMISE ↗
- Who funds Family Reach Alliance ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF LAKE HOUSTON ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GREAT FALLS ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF BALDWIN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF JACKSONVILLEINC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF BREVARD INC ↗
- Who funds Family Promise of Southern New Hampshire ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE METROWEST INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF WHITE & HABERSHAM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: The Woodforest Charitable Foundation · Charity Cars Inc Aka 1-800-Charity Cars Free Charity Cars · United Community Bank Foundation · Church Mutual Insurance Company Foundation Inc · Ann Earle Talcott Fund · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Washington Federal Foundation · Investors Foundation Inc · Kiwanis Cal-Nev-Ha Foundation · The Provident Bank Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Family Promise Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Family Promise of Southern Delaware Inc — 100% of income from government
- Family Promise of Northern New Castle County — 73% of income from government
- Family Promise of Essex County Inc — 33% of income from government
- Family Promise of Sussex County Inc — 32% of income from government
- Salem Interfaith Hospitality Network — 25% of income from government
- Family Promise of Morris County Inc — 17% of income from government
- Family Promise of Gainesville Florida Inc — 6% of income from government
- Family Promise Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.