Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Family Promise Inc

To prevent and end homelessness for families with children and help them achieve sustainable independence using a community-based response.

$4.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
108
Grants FY2025still arriving
34
States reached
$456k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Housing & Shelter$12MHuman Services$563kReligion$146kPublic Safety & Disaster$47kAnimals$45k
02FY2025 · 108 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 108 grants below total $3,991,373 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,605,214 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $613,841 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k92 grants · $2.3M
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+1 grant · $456k
$21,000
Median grant
34
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY PROMISE OF WEST MICHIGAN$456,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY$227,500
FAMILY PROMISE OF SPOKANE$140,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF THE MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY$140,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF LAS VEGAS$140,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF LAWRENCE$105,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ORLANDO$86,775
FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS$75,893
FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER PHOENIX$75,009
FAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY$75,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY$70,898
FAMILY PROMISE OF BALDWIN COUNTY$56,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF THE TRIANGLE$56,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF GAINESVILLE$49,275
FAMILY PROMISE OF MISSOULA$48,275
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $5.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILY PROMISE OF NORTHERN NEW CASTLE CO: $50k → 10%FAMILY PROMISE OF NORTH SHORE BOSTON: $63k → 10%FAMILY PROMISE OF PALOUSE: $31k → 16%FAMILY PROMISE IN ANOKA COUNTY: $30k → 7%FAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY: $75k → 10%FAMILY PROMISE OF MONTCO PA: $30k → 7%FAMILY PROMISE OF HARRISBURG CAPITAL REGION: $21k → 8%FAMILY PROMISE OF THE SOUTH BAY: $53k → 14%FAMILY PROMISE OF HAWAII: $50k → 9%FAMILY PROMISE OF BEAUFORT COUNTY: $21k → 10%FAMILY PROMISE OF THE MIDLANDS: $41k → 16%FAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTH SARASOTA COUNTY: $54k → 9%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ORLANDO: $87k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF BALDWIN COUNTY: $56k → 12%FAMILY PROMISE OF COASTAL ALABAMA: $21k → 19%FAMILY PROMISE OF LAWRENCE: $115k → 15%FAMILY PROMISE OF ROANE COUNTY: $21k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF FORSYTH COUNTY: $41k → 4%FAMILY PROMISE OF LARIMER COUNTY: $26k → 11%FAMILY PROMISE OF HENDRICKS COUNTY: $25k → 5%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY: $228k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUSSEX COUNTY: $75k → 6%FAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTHWEST NEW JERSEY: $40k → 8%FAMILY PROMISE OF THE JERSEY SHORE: $36k → 11%FAMILY PROMISE OF HUDSON: $32k → 14%FAMILY PROMISE OF ST TAMMANY: $62k → 11%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CONCORD: $53k → 7%FAMILY PROMISE OF NORTHERN NEW CASTLE COUNTY: $21k → 10%FAMILY PROMISE OF HAWAII: $46k → 9%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ORLANDO: $54k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF LAWRENCE: $105k → 15%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUSSEX COUNTY: $35k → 6%FAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTHWEST JERSEY: $32k → 8%FAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTHERN OCEAN COUNTY: $30k → 11%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CONCORD: $24k → 7%FAMILY PROMISE OF HAWAII: $33k → 9%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ORLANDO: $35k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF LAWRENCE: $55k → 15%FAMILY PROMISE OF SUSSEX COUNTY: $25k → 6%FAMILY PROMISE OF THE JERSEY SHORE: $30k → 11%FAMILY PROMISE OF HAWAII: $25k → 9%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ORLANDO: $26k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF LAWRENCE: $30k → 15%FAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTHWEST NEW JERSEY: $197k → 8%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ORLANDO: $22k → 13%FAMILY PROMISE OF OGDEN: $30k → 9%FAMILY PROMISE OF SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $71k → 14%FAMILY PROMISE OF SAN GABRIELLE VALLEY: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
DE
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 137 repeat orgs$763k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

137 repeat relationships — 96 still active in FY2025, 41 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

137
29

Total granted

$12M
$523k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
0%

Still filing today

97%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $240k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterReligionHealthPublic BenefitEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FP
    Family Promise of Spokane
    6× · 2020–2025 · $341k · revenue +669%
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF LAWRENCE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $340k · revenue +267%
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTHWEST NJ
    4× · 2021–2025 · $288k · revenue +157% · 28% of their budget

Funded once

  • FAMILY PROMISE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $123k · revenue +39%
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CHARLESTON
    one grant, 2022 · $64k
  • FP
    Family Promise of NorthCentral Palm Beach County
    one grant, 2021 · $53k · revenue -34%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Promise of Carteret County

Family promise of carteret county is a non-profit organization serving homeless families. assisting targeted families with daily hot meals and overnight accommodations, (with partnering communities in faith).

Employment
2
Family Promise of Pinellas County

To assist homeless families regain independence.

Human Services
3
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
4
Family Peace Project Inc

Provide temporary shelter, food, clothing, medical aid, and other resources to victims of domestic violence

Community Improvement
5
Family Promise of Bryan-College Station

To assist homeless families in securing stable housing

Housing & Shelter
6
Fostering Promise

The mission of Fostering Promise is to ensure that every young person who ages out of foster care has a safe place to call home, the support of a caring mentor and the hope for a promising future.

Human Services
7
Family Promise of Lawton Incorporated

To equip and empower homeless families with children to achieve sustainable independence.

Human Services
8
Family Promise of Gaston County

The mission of family promise of gaston county is to provide compassionate, loving support of meals, shelter and counseling services through a community-based network to homeless families of gaston county, as well as fostering and…

9
Family Promise of Warren County Inc

Family promise of warren county (fpwc) is an independent, self-supporting private non-profit 501(c)(3) agency that has served homeless and low-income families and individuals since july 2008. our mission is to help households achieve…

Housing & Shelter
10
Family Promise of Yucaipa-Calimesa

Family Promise of Yucaipa-Calimesa aims to end family homelessness. We are an interfaith organization that partners with and mobilizes volunteers from the faith-based community to end homelessness for Yucaipa-Calimesa's families and their…

Arts & Culture
11
Family Promise of Gwinnett County Inc

Empower and elevate families facing homelessness by leveraging the strengths of our community. our vision is that every family has a home, a livelihood, and the chance to build a stronger future.

12
Family Promise of the Northland Inc

To gather the communities of clay & platte counties in missouri in order to provide low-cost temporary shelter, meals, and assistance to qualifying homeless families.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Grand Rapids and the most unlike its peers is Allegheny Valley Association of Churches. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%13%5–10yr19%50%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%6%35–55yr16%1%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%43%10–20yr16%42%20–35yr13%6%35–55yr16%0%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%3/178
the rest of the field
13%
240,393/1,819,387

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

174 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 174 of the 178 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
58
Early backer (in before they grew)
168/174
Grantees still filing
103/174
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FAMILY PROMISE OF LAWRENCE INC — $340,400 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF LAWRENCE INCFAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTHWEST NJ — $288,488 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC — $260,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC — $229,825 · Human Services+89 more — $5,248,800 · Human Services+89 moreFAMILY PROMISE OF GRAND RAPIDS — $512,265 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE OF GRAND RAPIDSSALEM INTERFAITH HOSPITALITY NETWORK — $290,000 · Housing & ShelterSALEM INTERFAITH HOSPITALITY NETWORKFAMILY PROMISE OF LAS VEGAS INC — $273,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE OF LAS VEGAS INCFamily Promise of Greater Indianapolis Inc — $207,250 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE OF BURLINGTON COUNTY INC — $192,422 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE OF BELL COUNTY INC — $153,841 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE OF SHENANDOAH COUNTY INC — $152,550 · Housing & Shelter+47 more — $2,749,090 · Housing & Shelter+47 moreFAMILY PROMISE OF MORRIS COUNTY INC — $218,553 · OtherFORT BEND FAMILY PROMISE — $115,750 · OtherFAMILY PROMISE OF MISSOULA — $108,525 · OtherFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CLEVELAND — $94,700 · OtherFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CHARLESTON — $63,500 · OtherFAMILY PROMISE OF MONMOUTH COUNTY INC — $55,741 · OtherFAMILY PROMISE OF PORTER COUNTY INC — $45,000 · OtherFamily Promise of Linn County — $40,400 · Other+13 more — $212,175 · OtherFamily Promise of Spokane — $340,528 · ReligionFAMILY PROMISE - GREATER PHOENIX — $134,939 · ReligionFAMILY PROMISE OF GREAT FALLS — $110,000 · ReligionFAMILY PROMISE OF THE LOWER CAPE FEAR — $85,925 · ReligionUNITED MINISTRIES — $42,000 · ReligionFamily Promise of Southeast Florida Inc — $35,000 · ReligionFAMILY PROMISE OF YELLOWSTONE VALLEY — $94,525 · HealthInterfaith Coalition of Whatcom County — $25,000 · HealthFAMILY PROMISE OF OZAUKEE COUNTY — $67,500 · Public BenefitFamily Promise of Sacramento — $45,000 · Education
Human Services$6,367,513Housing & Shelter$4,530,418Other$954,344Religion$748,392Health$119,525Public Benefit$67,500Education$45,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GRAND RAPIDS — $512,265 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetFamily Promise of Spokane — $340,528 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF LAWRENCE INC — $340,400 over 7y, 6.1% of budgetSALEM INTERFAITH HOSPITALITY NETWORK — $290,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTHWEST NJ — $288,488 over 4y, 28% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF LAS VEGAS INC — $273,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC — $260,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC — $229,825 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF MORRIS COUNTY INC — $218,553 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetFamily Promise of Greater Indianapolis Inc — $207,250 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF BURLINGTON COUNTY INC — $192,422 over 2y, 52% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF HAWAII — $168,500 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF SUSSEX COUNTY INC — $162,053 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF BELL COUNTY INC — $153,841 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF SHENANDOAH COUNTY INC — $152,550 over 6y, 13% of budgetFamily Promise of San Gabriel Valley — $143,898 over 4y, 16% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTH SARASOTA COUNTY INC — $143,300 over 6y, 7.2% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF ATHENS INC — $142,950 over 6y, 13% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY INC — $142,655 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF LOS ANGELES — $139,000 over 6y, 9.2% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE - GREATER PHOENIX — $134,939 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF WAKE COUNTY INC — $134,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetFamily Promise of Davie County — $132,900 over 7y, 7.2% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GAINESVILLE FLORIDA INC — $127,675 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CONCORD INC — $126,997 over 5y, 9.2% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC — $125,741 over 5y, 6.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE INC — $123,093 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF ESSEX COUNTY INC — $121,303 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE NORTH SHORE BOSTON INC — $119,718 over 4y, 11% of budgetFORT BEND FAMILY PROMISE — $115,750 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetFamily Reach Alliance — $112,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF LAKE HOUSTON — $111,000 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREAT FALLS — $110,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF BALDWIN COUNTY — $106,408 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF JACKSONVILLEINC — $105,800 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF BREVARD INC — $102,550 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetFamily Promise of Southern New Hampshire — $98,497 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE METROWEST INC — $97,218 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF WHITE & HABERSHAM — $97,050 over 6y, 11% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF THE PALOUSE INC — $96,746 over 5y, 8.9% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER HELENA INC — $95,500 over 5y, 14% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CLEVELAND — $94,700 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF YELLOWSTONE VALLEY — $94,525 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER DENVER INC — $93,764 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF THE COASTAL EMPIRE INC — $93,108 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF BRADLEY COUNTY — $92,050 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $92,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF OGDEN — $89,354 over 5y, 11% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

The Woodforest Charitable FoundationTX59.4× affinity27 shared granteesties to 3 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Woodforest Charitable Foundation · Charity Cars Inc Aka 1-800-Charity Cars Free Charity Cars · United Community Bank Foundation · Church Mutual Insurance Company Foundation Inc · Ann Earle Talcott Fund · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Washington Federal Foundation · Investors Foundation Inc · Kiwanis Cal-Nev-Ha Foundation · The Provident Bank Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Family Promise Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 110%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 32%
  • Family Promise of Southern Delaware Inc100% of income from government
  • Family Promise of Northern New Castle County73% of income from government
  • Family Promise of Essex County Inc33% of income from government
  • Family Promise of Sussex County Inc32% of income from government
  • Salem Interfaith Hospitality Network25% of income from government
  • Family Promise of Morris County Inc17% of income from government
  • Family Promise of Gainesville Florida Inc6% of income from government
  • Family Promise Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
86report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 178 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph