Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Resnick Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60M
Granted FY2024still arriving
144
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$18M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Philanthropy$63MEducation$50MArts & Culture$23MScience & Tech$20MSocial Science$19MReligion$15MEnvironment$9.0MInternational$4.6MOther$0
02FY2024 · 144 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k43 grants · $176k
  • $10k–50k57 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k23 grants · $2.4M
  • $250k+21 grants · $56M
$20,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$17,798,101
Bard College$5,000,000
Jewish Federation of Southern New Jersey$5,000,000
Los Angeles County Museum of Art$4,000,000
National Philanthropic Trust$3,585,000
WONDERFUL COLLEGE PREP ACADEMY$3,000,000
Wilshire Boulevard Temple$2,600,000
Milken Institute$2,500,000
NLI USA INC$2,000,000
American Technion Society$2,000,000
UCLA Foundation$1,398,845
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center$1,300,000
FIJI Water Foundation$1,250,139
California State University Fresno Foundation$1,000,000
Keep Memory Alive$1,000,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $6.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%safe place for youth: $150k → 11%The People Concern: $271k → 14%NEWS: $25k → 9%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $256k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $250k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $9k → 14%BANCROFT: $42k → 12%Expressions of Hope: $20k → 9%LIVING ROOM CENTER INC: $10k → 9%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $250k → 14%On The Move: $17k → 9%Kings Community Action Organization Inc: $20k → 18%Kings Community Action Organization Inc: $16k → 18%HARVEST HOME INC: $100k → 14%Kings Community Action Organization Inc: $15k → 18%MOLLYS ANGELS: $15k → 9%LYNNE COHEN FOUNDATION FOR OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH: $25k → 14%EL CAMINO HOMELESS ORGANIZATION: $40k → 12%EL CAMINO HOMELESS ORGANIZATION: $39k → 12%YWCA Sonoma County: $8k → 9%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT INC: $10k → 17%Community Action Partnership of Kern: $1.6M → 18%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF KERN: $1.6M → 18%Community Action Partnership of Kern: $160k → 18%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $25k → 14%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF KERN: $75k → 18%HENRIETTA WEILL MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC: $10k → 18%HENRIETTA WEILL MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC: $10k → 18%HENRIETTA WEILL MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC: $10k → 18%Westside Family Preservation Services Network: $50k → 19%Westside Family Preservation Services Network: $50k → 19%OPEN DOOR NETWORK: $240k → 18%Alliance Against Family Violence & Sexual Assault: $71k → 18%Marjaree Mason Center INC: $50k → 19%Marjaree Mason Center Inc: $50k → 19%MARJAREE MASON CENTER INC: $25k → 19%Marjaree Mason Center INC: $25k → 19%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $30k → 14%United Friends of the Children: $30k → 14%safe place for youth: $150k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $30k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $30k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $25k → 14%United Friends of the Children: $30k → 14%Los Angeles Police Foundation: $120k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $120k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $120k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
KS
AR
NC
SC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$160M · 197 repeat orgs$15M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

197 repeat relationships — 83 still active in FY2024, 114 since wound down; 53 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

197
627

Total granted

$160M
$8.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+16%

Still filing today

56%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthEnvironmentInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BARD COLLEGE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15M · revenue +206%
  • AH
    ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $12M · revenue +22%
  • THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $11M · revenue +193%

Funded once

  • NL
    NATIONAL LIBRARY OF ISRAEL LTD
    one grant, 2021 · $2.0M
  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF SNJ
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M
  • CP
    CALY POLY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $500k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
2
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
3
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
4
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
5
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
6
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
7
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
8
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
9
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
10
League of California Community Foundations

The league of california community foundations promotes and strengthens community foundations in california. through collaboration and shared learning among member foundations and building partnerships with private and public entities, we…

Philanthropy
11
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
12
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Farrah Fawcett Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community FoundationsCommunity FoundationsAddiction Recovery ServicesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Youth Development CentersDance Arts OrganizationsElementary Literacy TutoringMilitary Veterans SupportDomestic Violence ServicesYouth Development ServicesLocal History MuseumsCancer Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsSchool Parent OrganizationsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community Food PantriesAnimal Rescue and ShelterAffordable Housing Construc…United Way AffiliatesSenior Support ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Health Access Advocacy and …Public Library OperationsAffordable Housing Developm…Immigrant Worker SupportOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Environmental Conservation …Christian Missionary Organi…Food Banks and PantriesLocal Food System Organizat…Policy Research and AdvocacyCommunity Arts CentersJewish Community Organizati…Community College Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%1%<5yr15%11%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr17%28%20–35yr11%19%35–55yr13%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%15%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr17%19%20–35yr11%7%35–55yr13%50%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.3%1/349
the rest of the field
14%
26,002/186,629

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

315 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 315 of the 895 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
50
Early backer (in before they grew)
309/315
Grantees still filing
195/315
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $30,685,254 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE — $13,000,000 · OtherWILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLETHE MILKEN INSTITUTE — $7,500,000 · OtherTHE MILKEN INSTITUTEFIJI WATER FOUNDATION — $6,763,509 · OtherFIJI WATER FOUNDATIONASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY — $3,182,592 · Other+111 more — $22,589,378 · Other+111 moreBARD COLLEGE — $15,000,000 · EducationBARD COLLEGEWONDERFUL COLLEGE PREP ACADEMY — $7,527,559 · EducationWONDERFUL COLLEGE PREP …NLI USA INC — $6,000,000 · EducationNLI USA INCCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO FOUNDATION — $5,012,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVER…UCLA FOUNDATION — $4,415,911 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $2,450,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF…+17 more — $4,257,948 · Education+17 moreNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $20,268,729 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILAN…JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY — $5,000,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATI…Central Valley Community Foundation A Corporation — $3,000,636 · PhilanthropyCentral Valley …+8 more — $892,329 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $18,000,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SO…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF REICHMAN UNIVERSITY INC — $2,500,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FR…+8 more — $1,709,000 · International+8 moreARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC — $12,000,000 · Arts & CultureARMAND HAMM…MUSEUM ASSOCIATES — $8,475,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM ASSO…+20 more — $1,083,720 · Arts & CultureTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $11,352,400 · Social ScienceCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF KERN — $3,535,200 · Human ServicesTHE PEOPLE CONCERN — $1,026,500 · Human ServicesLOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION — $375,000 · Human ServicesTHE OPEN DOOR NETWORK — $316,330 · Human ServicesSAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC — $300,000 · Human Services+12 more — $812,358 · Human Services
Other$83,720,733Education$44,663,418Philanthropy$29,161,694International$22,209,000Arts & Culture$21,558,720Social Science$11,352,400Human Services$6,365,388

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $20,268,729 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $18,000,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetBARD COLLEGE — $15,000,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC — $12,000,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $11,352,400 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetMUSEUM ASSOCIATES — $8,475,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetWONDERFUL COLLEGE PREP ACADEMY — $7,527,559 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE — $7,500,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetNLI USA INC — $6,000,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO FOUNDATION — $5,012,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY — $5,000,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $4,415,911 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF KERN — $3,535,200 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY — $3,182,592 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCentral Valley Community Foundation A Corporation — $3,000,636 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF REICHMAN UNIVERSITY INC — $2,500,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $2,450,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $2,000,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $1,375,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA CHARTER SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION — $1,050,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN — $1,026,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL LEADERSHIP FOUND — $1,000,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetAWAKENING RECOVERY INC — $600,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $500,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ — $500,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $431,579 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK — $396,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Fresno Inc — $380,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetLOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION — $375,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $356,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $350,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $345,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE — $335,248 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetTHE OPEN DOOR NETWORK — $316,330 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetSAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC — $300,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAELI NAVY SEALS INC — $300,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetACUMEN FUND INC — $275,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPS ARTS — $263,779 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $250,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY — $250,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMUST — $200,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetAG ONE — $150,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetBakersfield Symphony Orchestra Inc — $150,000 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetLAND TOGETHER DBA INSIGHT GARDEN PROGRAM — $150,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN — $150,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMARJAREE MASON CENTER INC — $150,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR JEWISH HISTORY INC — $144,800 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kern Community Founda…Sonoma County Communi…The Virginia and Alfr…Sonoma County Vintner…The Community Foundat…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Dignity HealthMcNabb FoundationSierra Health Foundat…Educational Employees…Bothin FoundationCentral California Fo…
Kern Community FoundationCA58.4× affinity30 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kern Community Foundation · Sonoma County Community Foundation · The Virginia and Alfred Harrell Foundation · Sonoma County Vintners Foundation · The Community Foundation San Luis Obispo · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Dignity Health · McNabb Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Educational Employees Credit Union · Bothin Foundation · Central California Food Bank

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Resnick Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
68report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Resnick Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Resnick Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 895 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home