Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY (California) receives grants from 27 organizations whose IRS filings report $6,469,756 to it, the largest being NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION ($1,001,117). 16 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$7.2M
Funders on record
27
Grants received
$6.5M
Net assets
$38M
16/27 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 52%
01What it does

What The Land Conservancy of San Luis Obispo County does

Mission

We conserve and care for the diverse wildlands, farms, and ranches of the central coast. We connect people to the land and to each other.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. The land conservation program establishes voluntary land protection agreements (conservation easements) with family farmers, ranchers, and landowners. The land conservancy also buys properties in fee title and receives gifts/donations of land. The program focuses on identifying and protecting san luis obispo county lands with important scenic, agricultural, habitat and cultural values. The land conservancy staff prepare grant applications and proposals, draft agreements, identify land management goals and objectives, and conduct monitoring of each property on an annual basis. The conservancy has protected 67,582 acres to-date.

    $3,288,010 spent$76,836 earned by the program
    51% of program spending
  2. The outreach and volunteer support program focuses on engaging community members in the mission of the organization and educating the public about land resources in san luis obispo county. The program works to build support for the organization through collaborative partnerships, volunteer activities, educational events, and outreach opportunities throughout the county. Currently the organization has 1,354 individual/household members (non-voting) and 137 business members (non-voting). The organization e-newsletter reaches 6,471, and the annual report goes out to approximately 1,700 people.

    $1,124,885 spent$177,554 earned by the program
    18% of program spending
  3. The stewardship and restoration program implements projects that focus on supporting healthy wildlife habitat, improving water quality, sustaining our local water supply, and protecting man-made infrastructure and farm fields. The program focuses on streams, wetlands, coastal dunes, and historic landmarks. Restoration and stewardship care program staff develop grant proposals, prepare permit applications and restoration plans, implement restoration activities, and monitor project results.

    $1,677,074 spent
    26% of program spending
  4. The youth education program focuses on providing opportunities for school-aged children to learn about nature through innovative programming using oak woodlands and other natural lands for hands-on experiential learning. Through partnerships with local public schools, the program trains and empowers childeren as future conservationists, instilling leadership and science skills. Thousands of students benefit from the program each year.

    $302,971 spent$6,770 earned by the program
    5% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $6,392,940.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.4M) Expenses 100 ($1.6M) Net assets 100 ($21M)2018 Revenue 319 ($7.6M) Expenses 454 ($7.1M) Net assets 103 ($21M)2019 Revenue 239 ($5.7M) Expenses 247 ($3.8M) Net assets 112 ($23M)2020 Revenue 644 ($15M) Expenses 326 ($5.1M) Net assets 161 ($33M)2021 Revenue 446 ($11M) Expenses 353 ($5.5M) Net assets 187 ($39M)2022 Revenue 420 ($10M) Expenses 682 ($11M) Net assets 182 ($38M)2023 Revenue 722 ($17M) Expenses 1116 ($17M) Net assets 182 ($38M)2024 Revenue 1153 ($28M) Expenses 1704 ($26M) Net assets 188 ($39M)2025 Revenue 301 ($7.2M) Expenses 492 ($7.6M) Net assets 186 ($38M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (301)Expenses (492)Net assets (186)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $25M to $36M (+41%).

$22M
$22M
$25M
$36M
$40M
$39M
$40M
$41M
$41M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 49% · 2018 60% · 2019 67% · 2020 4% · 2021 75% · 2022 68% · 2023 25% · 2024 82% · 2025 56%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

94% of THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,303 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$846k
’17
$585k
’18
$1.9M
’19
$10M
’20
$5.2M
’21
−$519k
’22
−$6k
’23
$1.2M
’24
−$416k
’25
1.9
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Kaila Adriane Dettman Hooker

Secretary/exec. Director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed101313131317191818
Joined·+3+3+3+2+5+2+1+3
No longer listed·03321023
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 5 funders to 12 funders, grant income fell $1.2M → $558k.

12 of 27 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 39% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $50k from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Inland Empire Community Foundation). These are real filings, and they are not money THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY raised.

From the IRS filings of THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 15% of grant income, and it takes 5 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 5 funders to its left

57% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY.

15%
largest funder
39%
top three
~10
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 56% · 2018 56% · 2019 84% · 2020 69% · 2021 63% · 2022 50% · 2023 47% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

42% of THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 59% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

70% of THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY's grant income comes from California funders.

MN
NY
PA
CT
CA
UT
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $2.5M arriving through sponsors registered in 9 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY has grown faster than half of the 1,209 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−6% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve1.9mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)15% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,209 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Government funding THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $1.8M on record.

Federal$1.8M
grants $1.8Mcontracts $50k
17
19
21
22
23
24
25
26
Top agencies
  • Department of the Interior$1.0M
  • Department of Defense$805k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

84% of spending goes to programs.

Program 84%Management 15%Fundraising 1%

Governance

14
board members
93%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

87%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY?
THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY (California) receives grants from 27 organizations whose IRS filings report $6,469,756 to it, the largest being NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION ($1,001,117). 16 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY have?
IRS filings report 27 organizations giving $6,469,756 in grants to THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, 16 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY?
NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $1,001,117 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Land Conservancy of San Luis Obispo County →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 27 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing