· Community foundation
Kern Community Foundation
KERN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION's mission is growing community and growing philanthropy.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $404k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $1.8M
- $250k+1 grant · $2.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AERA ENERGY FUND | $2,918,446 |
| YOUTH FOR CHRIST KERN COUNTY FUND | $243,000 |
| LINKED FUND | $229,000 |
| CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY BAKERSFIELD | $219,066 |
| UPPER KERN FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT FUND | $204,886 |
| AERA ENERGY FUND FOR CONSERVATION AND THE ENVIRONMENT | $150,000 |
| HAY FAMILY FOUNDATION FUND | $129,041 |
| ROD STIEFVATER FOUNDATION FUND | $124,560 |
| BAKERSFIELD MUSEUM OF ART FUND | $100,561 |
| SOUTHERN SIERRA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - CAMP KERN FUND | $89,611 |
| MCCARTHY FAMILY FUND | $82,600 |
| KERN AND DANCE ALLIANCE | $81,000 |
| BATEY CHARITABLE FUND | $78,500 |
| BOREL FIRE RELIEF FUND | $64,575 |
| CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY SAN LUIS OBISPO | $41,375 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $958k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
121 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 105 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CSCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY BAKERSFIELD FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +18%
- TBTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KERN COUNTY5× · 2017–2022 · $512k · revenue +147%
- BSBakersfield Symphony Orchestra Inc6× · 2017–2022 · $326k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- TATHE AGRICULTURAL FOUNDATION OF CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNOone grant, 2022 · $326k · revenue +4%
- BSBAKERSFIELD SOUTHWEST BASEBALL INCone grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue 0% · 42% of their budget
- MVMOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY CHURCHone grant, 2017 · $218k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Established in 1962, the foundation is the central foundation for the california state university (csu) system and serves the office of the chancellor. the foundation exists to support excellence in teaching and learning, and to serve the…
Kern medical center foundation is dedicated to promote education and programs that support the mission of kern medical center
Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…
To further the scientific, literary, educational and charitable purposes of california state university, monterey bay, including fundraising, development, endowment management, financial assistance, public relations and other support.
To actively promote, pursue and steward private support for the advancement of california state university, fullerton.
To represent, protect and advance the social, economic and educational interest of the farmers in kern county, california.
To create, promote and enhance business opportunities for our membership, and provide business, cultural and resource linkages, with special emphasis on the Hispanic community.
Raise private resources to advance the mission and priorities of the university and serve as ambassadors in the community. provide stewardship in the prudent investment of resources and ensure the integrity of the foundation through…
As your financial institution, we pledge to serve you and our community faithfully. we will be friendly, helpful, and professional, and we will provide great products and competitive rates.
Csu east bay foundation is an auxiliary organization of california state university east bay and the california state university system. the organization's mission is to provide services that aid, supplement, and advance the educational…
The foundation's mission is to benefit, support, and enhance the missions of the california community college system.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dolores C Huerta Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Rod Stiefvater Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
303 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 303 of the 414 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY BAKERSFIELD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KERN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds Bakersfield Symphony Orchestra Inc ↗
- Who funds THE AGRICULTURAL FOUNDATION OF CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA TROUT INC ↗
- Who funds KERN COUNTY YOUTH FOR CHRIST ↗
- Who funds BAKERSFIELD SOUTHWEST BASEBALL INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN SIERRA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds Bakersfield Art Foundation Inc DBA Bakersfield Museum of Art ↗
- Who funds BAKERSFIELD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Garden Pathways Inc ↗
- Who funds PLUMAS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds 911 AT EASE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KERN COUNTY MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BAKERSFIELD COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE HENRIETTA WEILL MEMORIAL CHILD GUIDANCE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds BAKERSFIELD RESCUE MISSION DBA THE MISSION AT KERN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds ALL ABOUT CARE ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ROD STIEFVATER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Hoffmann Hospice of The Valley ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE HATCHERY ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Virginia and Alfred Harrell Foundation · Resnick Foundation · Valley Strong Cu Fka Kern Schools Federal Credit Union · Diane S Lake Charitable Trust Lake Diane S Ttee · Bakersfield Memorial Hospital · Dignity Health · Seedcore Foundation · William & Florence Wheeler Foundation · Robert Grimm Family Foundation · San Joaquin Community Hospital dba Adventist Health Bakersfield · The Cynthia Lake Charitable Trust · Bakersfield West Rotary-Stroope Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kern Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.